User talk:Rvbcave

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Rvbcave, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 10:41, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Rvbcave, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Draft:Capt. John Zumrick, M.D. have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Simplexity22 (talk) 02:50, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Capt. John Zumrick, M.D. (April 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:41, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Rvbcave! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 10:41, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Capt. John Zumrick, M.D. has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Capt. John Zumrick, M.D.. Thanks! --Cameron11598 (Talk) 18:17, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article is not about Capt. John or you, unsourced and overly biased anecdotes about you and your friendship are not appropriate or encyclopedic. Please do not restore this again, and also please read WP:COI, as you clearly have one here--Jac16888 Talk 13:06, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like Bill’s phone number or email address to confirm any of this information? Zumrick was integral to Bill beginning work on the Hogarthian Configuration. I’m the only instructor teaching his methods purely. Rvbcave (talk) 14:22, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For instance, this statement is wholly incorrect: “Described as "a perfectionist," Main and his dive partner Sheck Exley adopted the long hose devised by Exley and began to look at other ways to improve the minimalism, efficiency, and safety of every component of his dive gear“

Zumrick is the person who invented the long hose, not Exley. Rvbcave (talk) 14:29, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In that case I have removed that sentence altogether. A phone number is not a reliable source, we have no way to verify it's truly the person in question and even if we could "He told me himself" is not verifiable. Please find some real sources, and stop trying to add content about yourself, it's not appropriate--Jac16888 Talk 09:53, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 11:04, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]