User talk:Rwiggum/Archive 2
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
We are not spammers...
Regarding our previous discussion, you still did not answer my question... what constitutes a notable, credible source? Have you looked at KevinNottingham.com, let alone read one of our reviews?
1) We are award winners. SOHH Online Hip-Hop Award winners http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOHH. Thus, we have been certified, by a "credible website" that we, ourselves, are credible and represent music better than some of the other websites out there.
2) If a website like RapReviews.com, which not only get less hits than us, but has blatantly pathetic reviews, is on Wikipedia, why can't we be?
3) We have interviews from highly credible artists including Akon and Talib Kweli; artist who will vouch for the website as a "credible source," specifically acknowledging our content, our interviews, and our album reviews.
4) We have no interest in promoting our website, in fact, we've made it where we are with zero promotion. We are concerned with educating people HONESTLY about an album or an album's content. While websites like Rapreviews give everything a 10/10 and HipHopDX give everything a 3.5/5, we present a larger scale and fuller, in depth reviews.
5) How are we promoting ourselves though, where Hip Hop DX and such aren't? We actually HAVE cited previous articles with information, especially regarding sample sources of particular hip hop songs that were even once inaccurate.
Once again, I beg to see how we are negative for Wikipedia. We put our link in the Review section because a) it is asked for and b) so people can read the full review. We have gotten some great clicks from Wikipedia turning new readers into big fans of one of the more credible hip hop sites out there. Not only do we have awards to prove it, we have a fan base of over 15,000 hits a day WORLD WIDE, attention from some of the best and biggest artists in hip hop and R&B, and a site owner that is heavily involved in the music industry. It pains me to believe that a site like RapReviews.com is "okay" but KevinNottingham.com isn't. Please, I emplore you to read one of the reviews, check out the site. Then you will see that we have no interest in spamming, instead we wish to improve the knowledge of hip hop.
Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pan21897 (talk • contribs) 03:54, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
the relevancy of WP:POKEMON
since you don't understand the applicability of WP:POKEMON, i'll explain it in terms that even you can understand. WP:POKEMON is an example of why WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS is true. that articles on other crap exist does not mean articles on other crap will always exist. people used to say "we can't delete this article because there are articles on pokemon!". well, there aren't, anymore, as that article very clearly establishes. similarly, "Stephen Colbert at the 2006 White House Correspondents' Association Dinner (2nd nomination)" ought not be cited as precedent for inclusion because there's no guarantee it'll be around forever.
in short, your comments in the afd "are asinine and completely missing the point" (to quote you). i suggest you refrain from participating in afd's in the future until you better understand wikipedia's policies. as is, your closing arguments hold no sway and are in violation of WP:JUSTAVOTE, WP:CIVIL, and WP:AFD. Misterdiscreet (talk) 23:38, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
- WP:POKEMON and WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS are interpretations of WP:CCC and interpretations are perfectly valid reasons for deleting articles. want precedent? check out Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Colbert at the 2006 White House Correspondents' Association Dinner (2nd nomination). it was closed with WP:SNOW which, itself, is an interpretation of WP:IAR. my suggestion to you, sir, is to stop presuming to know anything about a subject you are clearly ignorant about Misterdiscreet (talk) 21:24, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- i must have missed that part in in WP:CIVIL where it says "thou shalt not disagree with Rwiggum". maybe you could point that section out to me? Misterdiscreet (talk) 21:38, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- you didn't look very hard then. Misterdiscreet (talk) 21:59, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- also, i'm not attacking - i'm defending. someone presents evidence that they believe counters my position and i'll defend my position. if i wasn't prepared to defend my position i have no business making it my position. that doesn't mean i'm not open to compromise, however, as previously demonstrated Misterdiscreet (talk) 22:03, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
You made me work for it... that's for sure. But thank you for requesting te closure. And in noting the removal of the additional reviews, I moved them to the talk page per guideline so they are accessible should anyone wish to glean them for additiona informations. And actually, I believe I will go through the director interviews again, as some of that stuff is quite helpful. It was through the director's own livejournal page that I was given the clues as to where to find some nice sources. Best, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 16:40, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
re snowball clause
not that I'm interested in getting hung up on this goofy page, but don't you think this revert was a bit extreme? couple of points:
- it really is an extension of 'not a bureaucracy', and has more in common with common sense, point, and civility than IAR. the snowball clause actually works against 'Ignore all rules'.
- a lot of the writing in my revisions is just plain better than what was there previously.
read it more carefully and see if you disagree. --Ludwigs2 01:03, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- hmmm... interesting. you've made edits since I left this message (so I know you've seen it), but you didn't respond, here or on the talk page. so I'll revert, and open a discussion on the talk page. see you there!
--Ludwigs2 20:27, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of AnimationToolkit
An article that you have been involved in editing, AnimationToolkit, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AnimationToolkit. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. MuZemike 05:04, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
I've declined your request for deletion of the Timothy Training Institute per A7. To avoid A7 an article only needs to make a claim at importance/significance. This article clearly does so in numerous places. For example, the claim to serving 2 million people is a claim of significance. The claim of working in 40 countries is a claim to significance. The role of providing training to people who otherwise wouldn't have recourse to formal training is one of importance. Any one of these is enough to avoid a CSD... that does not mean that any of these will protect it from AFD. But it is enough to avoid CSD. For more on this you might want to read Why I hate Speedy Deleters or Field guide to proper speedy deletion.---I'm Spartacus! NO! I'm Spartacus! 19:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Ok, so I have edited the page and included even more info-but I still don't know what would make this page, to be "approved". Why would a page, e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Doors be considered, when the creator didn't even add one reference, yet when I include more info and add references, the page is still flagged for deletion. I accept the fact that you have guidelines and if my page gets deleted, that's fine, but Im having trouble in understanding why...especially when I compare it to other pages...Is it perhaps a matter of private interpretation? Kevincarldavis (talk) 14:08, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Re: Queen Hyde Park AFD
There were too many comments to justify a relist. –Juliancolton | Talk 19:54, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Hey there Rwiggum, I've asked SJ to explain what he sees in this article that justifies removing the CSD tag. Generally, I am opposed to restoring CSD tags from articles once an independent party has removed it. But in this case, I don't see the reason it should have been removed.---I'm Spartacus! NO! I'm Spartacus! 23:56, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello Rwiggum Can you explain why my page for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nozio was deleted when a similar page exists that has hardly any content or references and in my mind is clearly an advertisement for the company? for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hotels.com Travelbrit , also I'm happy to follow your guidelines as long they are applied to everyone or this this not the wikipedia way? thx (talk) 21:06, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Norwegian: Bruker du bleie?
Bruker du bleie? I asking you. Did you know what "bruker du bleie" means? Well, I know it, so I must say: BRUKER DU BLEIE? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bad News Live 1982-87 (talk • contribs) 13:30, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Doornails (song)
That's fine with me, I made that page when I first started with wikipedia. (User: Whoneedspants) 23:55, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
As you made the original nomination for this article, you may be interested in the above. Black Kite 19:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
If you have time, I'd appreciate your looking in at Horror film genre-specifc reliable sources and either comment, advise, or contribute. I think something like this should have been a while ago so as to help stop the bickering at AfDs. I figure that by offering a simple article that shows how certain (not all) independent review sites meet guideline, we can perhaps have someplace to look in our checking of source suitability. I have found your discussions at AfD to be inciteful and would much appreciate your input. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:47, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi! I see yor thoughts on an expedient
Hi ok well I see your thoughts on the Avril Lavigne Bonez World Tour
ok please check onc egain the page We already put tons of new info, pictures, references, background and well just to see the dates and see that the tour was worldwide means that this was an important tour. I don't think this should be delated pleaseee also imagine all the hard work of puttin the 144 dates one by one that's a hard work anyway the page is gettin each time with more info and it would continue gettin more so it has defenetly to stay
also we decide to create the Avril tours pages because she was one of the only biggest artist that doesn't have it
we promise and I more than anything I promise to continue collaborating with all the best info we find :D BUT PLEASE don't delated I don't think that's fair.
thank you and take care bye —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emmanuel rocks (talk • contribs) 04:05, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:16, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
File:FMMLP2.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:FMMLP2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 10:50, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
...
"Thanks for that, and thanks for pointing out the block, Kww. I just submitted a checkuser request without realizing that the IP had been blocked. I'll withdraw it now."
It is a public computer, don't you think? If you don't know then don't act like a whiner. But it is, and many other people like me use it, or used it until someone decided to play smart. What kind of twisted person goes whining on the Administrators about someone that might or might not have gone around their stupid rules? And in case you want to block this other computer too, I warn you that it is also a public one. 194.65.1.253 (talk) 17:18, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Current members/Past members
Instead of getting into an edit war, and also because you provided me with a link to an article which is maintained frequntly, I've decided to message you here.
Template:Infobox_Musical_artist#Past_members states clearly that all former members should be listed under Former Members if the band is inactive.
Which is right and which is wrong? There seems to be a conflict here? »—Mikay—talk—contribs→ 19:49, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the speedy reply to my message! :D
There does seem to be a fine line here. I went and looked in the featured articles to see the general consensus and there's a discussion about this issue on the Nirvana talk page. The consensus seems to be the way you have said, but there are some valid arguments against the latter.
You're right about SoCo though, I guess if they were to return from their hiatus, they'd return in the form of the "Current Members" list. Interesting discussion though - I think the template probably needs updating. »—Mikay—talk—contribs→ 20:00, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
David L Cook page
I am unsure as to why you nominated the television sub page for this article after it has already passed a WP:GA and it was suggested that the subpage be set up to save space by more than one admin? I have looked and I do not find one instance where this was used as a push for POV as you staed in your deletion request. I would like it very much if you explain your actions here! This is a very well done article and has been looked at not only by myself but a wikipedia Bureaucrat as well as several adminstrators. I look forward to hearing from you. Canyouhearmenow 04:20, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:1UP FM logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:1UP FM logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:12, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Legendary Thread.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Legendary Thread.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:50, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Sports Anomaly.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Sports Anomaly.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:50, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Review Crew.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Review Crew.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:50, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:BrokenPixels1.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:BrokenPixels1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:50, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:EGM Live.png)
Thanks for uploading File:EGM Live.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:51, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (File:Brokenpixels-season2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Brokenpixels-season2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 11:01, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
NowCommons: File:TGUK Emos.png
File:TGUK Emos.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:TGUK Emos.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:TGUK Emos.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:06, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- File:TGUK Bowry.png is now available as Commons:File:TGUK Bowry.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:08, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- File:GUKfinal.png is now available as Commons:File:GUKfinal.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:09, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Please update your status with WP:VG
Dear WikiProject Video games member,
You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or {{User WPVG}} somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in recent months.
The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.
All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:
- Editing video game-related pages in the Article namespace
- Participating in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)
Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.
- —WikiProject Video games (delivery by xenobot 03:42, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Killedorcured-cover.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Killedorcured-cover.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 05:35, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Another gentle ping from WP:VG
Dear Rwiggum,
You are receiving this message because either [[Category:WikiProject Video games members]] or {{User WPVG}} is somewhere in your userspace, and you are currently listed in the "Unknown" section on the project's member list.
The member list is meant to provide a clearer picture of active membership. It is recommended that you update your status if you plan to regularly:
- Edit video game-related pages in the Article namespace
- Participate in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)
Members listed in the "Unknown" section will be removed from the membership list and category at the end of January 2010. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.
Sincerely, the Video Games WikiProject (delivery by xenobot 22:01, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Fred Entertainment.
I saw you moved it, but did you see my post on the talk page?I personally think the article should be deleted. Thoughts? --HELLØ ŦHERE 23:35, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: The Willing Well IV: The Final Cut
Hello Rwiggum. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of The Willing Well IV: The Final Cut, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to albums or songs. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 12:35, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Orphaned non-free image File:Stay down.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Stay down.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:56, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Egg and face
http://www.slashfilm.com/2010/03/23/kevin-smiths-red-state-gets-a-green-light-will-shoot-before-hit-somebody/ Bencey (talk) 23:10, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
June 2010
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Braid (band). Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 20:59, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:39, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
User Geo Swan
Your edit: Could you please explain. It was declined without reason. This is an attack page. Personal attacks are serious what is the next step. ANI? IQinn (talk) 03:44, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
I've removed the prod tag from this article as I (strongly) suspect this band meets the notability threshold and I've neutralized the language quite a bit. It still needs sourcing, but it's less bad than before. That said, this may well be a candidate for AfD. I'm not the guy to do it, though, since I would be inclined to vote to keep. Majorclanger (talk) 22:19, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Could use your thoughts
Cheers, buddy. I've recently been working on cleaning up the article on Braid. I rememberd earlier you mentioned that you had read Post by Eric Grubbs. I don't know if you know much about Braid, but I'd appreciate it if you took a look at what I've got so far and give me a little feedback. I havn't gotten the sources punched in yet, but I could use any help you may have there as well, since most of my info comes from Post. Keep up the good edits.Natt the Hatt (talk) 05:47, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. I actually went to Amazon and got a copy. It does have a lot of info about a couple of bands. Most of what I have is from that. Now I just need to get a few other sources to round things out a little.Natt the Hatt (talk) 15:02, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Hey, I was just looking over the list of members on the Podcasting group and wanted to see if you were still active in the project. If so, it looks like the project could use a little jump-start. In particular, I think notability requirements and assessment guidelines could be added/updated. Please check out the page if you're still interested and move your name to the 2011 active list. Thanks! Udeezy (talk) 23:14, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
RE: There Are Rules assessment
Exist many unsourced statements ("However, after Reynolds left Myspace, he approached the band about self-distributing the album on their own label. The album was released on January 25, 2011 on compact disc, 180 gram vinyl and digital download. The iTunes version of the album came with two bonus tracks.", "One of the most positive takes came from Alternative Press, who gave the album four-and-a-half stars out of five", the personnel and chart performance sections; still missing the commercial performance, a solid WP:LEAD, promotion (if exists), etc. So that's why it is not a B-class article. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 19:36, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Mcdonald Elementary School for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mcdonald Elementary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mcdonald Elementary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:34, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
New page patrolling
Hello, Rwiggum. I just wanted to stop by to thank you for your help with the vital work of patrolling new pages, and ask if you might make sure to "mark" pages as patrolled by clicking the 'mark this page as patrolled' link at the bottom of the new page after you've done checking the article. This saves time and work by informing fellow patrollers of your review of the page, so that they do not duplicate efforts. Thanks! Skomorokh 09:32, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:BugSessionsV2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:BugSessionsV2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:37, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:BugSessionsV3.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:BugSessionsV3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:37, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:More Than Sixteen Tons of Bluegrass.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:More Than Sixteen Tons of Bluegrass.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 01:57, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:BugSessionsComp.png
Thanks for uploading File:BugSessionsComp.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:30, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 25
Hi. When you recently edited Uri Zohar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Need help with Broken Bride
Greetings Rwiggum. First of all, welcome back, I haven't seen you around for awhile. I noticed you reverted an edit to the article on Ludo's Broken Bride. Unfortunately, I've been going back and forth with that particular editor (I assume, since they have no username) for some time. I've tried to contact them, but when I do, they change to another IP address. They've made no attempt to contact me to see if we can come to a consensus, and simply revert every edit I make. I'm hoping your help might get the point across. If not, maybe you could point me in the right direction for solving this problem, since I've never run into this issue before. Sorry to dump a problem on you, but you've always been very consistent and helpful to me. Cheers. Natt the Hatt (talk) 02:08, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:TGUK itunes.png)
Thanks for uploading File:TGUK itunes.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
The Revolution goes on...
Sorry, the band DOES have an article The Duckworth Lewis Method. There can be a problem finding out because of Duckworth Lewis Method also existing and being a redirect to Duckworth–Lewis method (which is where the band get their name from). Confused? So am I. I don't understand cricket. (I understand American sports even less...) Whether or not the track is notable, I'm not sure. Probably is from the look of things. Whichever, it's not a speedy job. You have to have non-notable AND redlink for A9. (I've linked the group's name, and the track in their article.) Peridon (talk) 20:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: The Baby Snakes
Hello Rwiggum. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of The Baby Snakes, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Having members who are notable indicates importance/significance. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:02, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Change of Venue (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kansas City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:15, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
The article Sean Riley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article relies on one article which relies entirely on one source that is 404'd. If someone can find credible sources to sustain the article, then I retract my proposal, but I was unable to find any.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sulfurboy (talk) 09:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Article notability notification
Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Change of Venue (album), has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Change of Venue (album)" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 17:37, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
As the concept of a "Pixar Universe" preceded the Negroni thesis by a decade, I seek your opinion about THIS. Thanks, Schmidt, Michael Q. 20:53, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Perhaps I can fold my little sourced article into the main topic Pixar and we'd have a suitable redirect target for The Pixar Theory? Schmidt, Michael Q. 22:10, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
File:Kindapattonvinyl.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kindapattonvinyl.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 18:15, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
File:222patton.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:222patton.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 18:17, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:The Real Ghostbusters.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Real Ghostbusters.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:56, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The Real Ghostbusters.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:The Real Ghostbusters.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:27, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Honda Civic Tour.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Honda Civic Tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Killers day age.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Killers day age.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Basedonatruestory-cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Basedonatruestory-cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
File source problem with File:All Songs Considered - 2009.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:All Songs Considered - 2009.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 09:56, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:All Songs Considered - 2009.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:All Songs Considered - 2009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BethNaught (talk) 16:32, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Black Lodge Recording Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Black Lodge Recording Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:TRSLogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TRSLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:24, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The Get Up Kids - Coming Clean.ogg
Thank you for uploading File:The Get Up Kids - Coming Clean.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Dashboard Confessional AOL EP.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dashboard Confessional AOL EP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Rwiggum. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Still There's a Light.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Still There's a Light.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:EndofanError.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:EndofanError.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Rwiggum. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Tijuana Crime Scene for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tijuana Crime Scene is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tijuana Crime Scene until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 23:15, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Change of Venue.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Change of Venue.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:TGUK Live.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TGUK Live.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Devilonourside.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Devilonourside.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Wire Tapes Vol 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Wire Tapes Vol 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Climb Trees.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Climb Trees.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:SlowDownGandhi.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:SlowDownGandhi.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Get Up Kids, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matt Pryor. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peter Katis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page After the Morning.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Filmspotting.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Filmspotting.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Underoath Deluxe Edition.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Underoath Deluxe Edition.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Underoath Special Edition.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Underoath Special Edition.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:1UP Show.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:1UP Show.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:1up yours.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:1up yours.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ListenUp-Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ListenUp-Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matt Pryor (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Buckner.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Civility Barnstar |
| Uggg my mistake on the Kicker (EP) article, I went through all the interviews on Billboard and FINALLY found one that talked about Kicker making it to number 10 on the Billboard Vinyl chart which was all it really needed. The Indie chart that's listed on the bands discography is behind a paywall. Thanks for being chill and responsive, I almost made a really stupid mistake to an important article. You were super cool and professional which I really appreciate. Thanks again! Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 01:54, 7 July 2022 (UTC) |
@Dr_vulpes Aww, thank you so much for this!! My pleasure! Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 03:57, 7 July 2022 (UTC)