User talk:Ryulong/Archive 101

Archive 95

←

Archive 99

Archive 100

Archive 101

Archive 102

Archive 103

Archive 104

Reverts

You're getting awfully close to 3RR on the GamerGate article. Be cautious in that. Tutelary (talk) 22:34, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Part of it was an edit conflict though.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:44, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

You've now passed it by removing the vivian image 4 times, and this is not an execptional case of 3RR involving NFCC. --MASEM (t) 23:40, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

It does fail NFCC though.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 05:31, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

It seems you could use a dose of Wikilove, hope this helps.

Diego (talk) 10:43, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Ryulong, please keep calm and WP:DISENGAGE if you need it. This is the kind of emotional outbursts that don't help convince anyone at the "other side" and shouldn't happen within the talk page. I've collapsed it per NOTFORUM, you may consider moving it to someone's talk page to allow others to reply. Diego (talk) 10:43, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

How am I supposed to keep calm when I'm being blamed again for being contacted offsite or following links posted onsite? This is all insane.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 11:00, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

You could take a voluntary WP:WIKIBREAK or wiki holiday, which is a venerable way of letting things cool off; or focus on discussing the specifics of content being added or removed from the article. It's only natural that if you comment on someone's behavior, they'll comment back on yours; if you stick to the specifics of words appearing in main space, the more personal aspects around you should wear off. Diego (talk) 11:25, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello

Just wanted to say that regardless of our disagreements, I respect you

3O on Pretty Guardian Sailor Moon (live-action series)

Yes, as soon as George also paraphrases his argument I will re-read the discussion and provide my opinion. The discussion was long and after reading it I wanted a brief summary of where exactly we stand now. Thank you. --AmritasyaPutra^T 16:55, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Ryukyuan languages

Hello. I think that your reversions of User:Nanshu's editions cause a loss to development of Ryukyuan languages' articles. Why do you completely revert Nanshu's editions although he indicate the sources?--Kyoww (talk) 02:07, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Because his additions add fringe commentary about how there are more languages than mainstream linguistics studies consider. There are discussions all over Wikipedia on this.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 05:28, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Did he really create all those redirects? For now I've fixed Kunigami language and most of Okinawan languages and tagged "Northern Okinawan language" for deletion. However, his pet article Amami–Okinawan languages (which should be moved to Northern Ryukyuan languages) would be difficult to clean up even if he left it alone. I'm also considering writing Southern Ryukyuan languages. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 03:02, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

I've reverted him again. If someone wants to refer me back so be it. I'll just create AFDs when I come back from my trip.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 06:29, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

I've started an AfD draft. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 19:23, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

You should prepare one for the other languages he created pages for.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 19:24, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

I think that Yoron language and Okinoerabu language are precious editions... I also regard Nanshu's editions include problems as you said, but it is not better to revert his editions wholesale.--Kyoww (talk) 06:49, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Yoron might have something to stand on its own with but his other edits (particularly his renaming of a whole language just to get it away from verbiage that gives it a native name) is disingenuous.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 07:05, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Kunigami language. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 13:37, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Gamergate controversy

I generally have quite a bit of leeway with this, but you need to drop the profanity out of the language your using on the talk page. Using the f word while others are trying to discuss a solution isn't helpful to resolving the dispute and is becoming disruptive and incivil. Please stop. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:59, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Fine. Also, that guy you blocked isn't a sock.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 15:14, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Superfly templates

Why did you revert my changes? A main template and a songs template are extremely standard for musicians, especially ones as prolific as Superfly who have so many articles on songs. --Prosperosity (talk) 00:04, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

I just don't think it's necessary to split the content up like that. It's common but not 100% necessary.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 07:45, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

There are currently 22 Superfly songs with articles at Wikipedia, it's getting a bit large for the main template. I've merged the new songs-style template as a child section of the main one, as a compromise. --Prosperosity (talk) 09:19, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Well I just figure it's not like MISIA who's been around for a while and has too many singles for a template, or various Western artists who have so many more singles than Superfly. Also, it's still a band and not a solo singer.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 12:40, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

It's a musical project with only one person, the borders are a little fuzzy! --Prosperosity (talk) 13:05, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

It was a band but the second member is just writing the songs (or has been, I'm not 100% sure anymore). Also, are we going to write something on the new single Ai ni Karada whatever?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 13:21, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

You can, if you'd like! It's already charted on Billboard so there aren't any notability issues from it being too early. I'm a bit busy with uni, but I might make one for Bi-Li-Li Emotion later. --Prosperosity (talk) 13:32, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Well I'm busy trying to deal with Vongfong delaying all of my flights. Whenever you can get to it is fine. I think we don't have to worry about copyright on the digital single cover for Ai whatever karada blah blah because of its simplicity.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 13:51, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Yurukyara article

Why would the Yurukyara article turn into a redirect if it's an article in the German, Hungarian and Japanese Wikipedias? I think it's a distinctive mascot category with its own culture, supported by many sources out there. TheGGoose (talk) 16:16, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Because it's horribly written, mostly unsourced, vaguely written, and just not a very good article.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 16:21, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

I don't see any mention of Yurukyara or even Japan's mascots in the mascot article. The article could have been improved instead. Maybe I can do it by starting it small akin to the German article, and at least expand it, or rewrite and keep portions of the article if sources exist for them. The German and Japanese Wikipedias have two different articles on Mascots and Yurukyara. You said in the edit summary that the reason for redirecting is that both are about the same subject, but you stated here that it's because the article is poor. There are several articles of Yurukyara mascots in the English Wikipedia, but I believe a Yurukyara article has to unify them more. TheGGoose (talk) 16:34, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

That is because the "yuru-chara" is just a Japanese mascot character. Just because there are several articles on these characters on the English Wikipedia does not mean we need to define it, particularly in a way that's terribly written, not in the format of any actual Wikipedia articles, and that has an unnecessary focus on the financial aspects.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 17:26, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Japan has a large mascot field, with what I believe has a higher proportion of mascot use to firms and public bodies than in other countries. Yuru-kyara is a big term in that field in Japan, and these mascots are cared differently from western ones. There's plenty of events that are dedicated to them (with available sources), and they're even ranked by popularity in an annual competition. I do not believe the quality of the article is an argument against its standing, as it can be rewritten in order to ease your concerns. Does it appear that yuru-kyara overlaps with the kawaii article? TheGGoose (talk) 18:19, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

You are free to make an article on the subject (although I think "Yuru-chara" is better) but the one that was there was just not very good.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 19:56, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Request for Arbitration declined

This is a courtesy notice to inform you that a request for arbitration, which named you as a party, has been declined. Feel free to see the Arbitrators' opinions for potential suggestions on moving forward.

For the Arbitration Committee, → Call me Hahc21 21:34, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Let him hang himself

Let him hang himself. There's no need to further revert or respond and no sense in giving anyone an excuse to block you over a talk page edit war. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 05:46, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Titanium Dragon is going to humor him some more and you and I both know he should still be banned.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 05:48, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Don't I know it. Just ignore them. They can't do anything to the actual page and they sure as hell can't create a consensus to protected-edit. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 05:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

I should have put up my "ban all these pro-GG editors to save us all time" thread on ANI.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 05:51, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Title of new TAR Chinese Version

Hello. Thank you for fixing my mistakes in that article at first.

I'm not very sure about the title, since I afraid that "The Amazing Race (Shenzhen TV)" is not an appropriate way to describe the new show, and we can't use "The Amazing Race (China)" because we already had China Rush. I'm wondering that if you can find a better way to solve it. Thanks in advance. Curisutina@Future Gadget Lab | Talk 18:12, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

I'm not personally sure. "(China)" may be better.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 20:32, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Ryulong. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 22:04, 22 October 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Found the link to the offsite stuff you mentioned; you were right about that bit. Tutelary (talk) 22:04, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

The best part is that they think I'm straight.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:05, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Oh wait, I see a death threat and Overlord Q coaching them.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:09, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

For having the bravery to start that ANI, regardless of the outcome. There's clearly a problem and I hope admins have the wherewithal to do something about it.

EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 00:20, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Your edit request

A head's up: Your edit request got archived to Talk:Gamergate controversy/Archive 10 so now it doesn't show up on CAT:EP anymore. Instead it is displaying on CAT:ESP. Stickee (talk) 04:22, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 04:24, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning GamerGate (controversy), to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 15:32, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#RfC

Hello, you are invited to join the discussion at the aforementioned page. Thank you and happy editing. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 08:26, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Writing paragraphs in The Amazing Race articles

When I found out you changed a new prose style for The Amazing Race leg paragraph formats, and Shadow2/174.1.50.249 wrote in my talk page:

I know you want to be helpful, but this is not the task for you. You're giving yourself the task of writing large in-depth paragraphs, thirteen for each page, and your grasp of the English language is unfortunately not very good. Please leave this task to someone who speaks the language, because I'm sorry to say that what you've written looks really unprofessional.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ApprenticeFan#Please_Stop

ApprenticeFan ^work 07:47, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

You do need to work on your grammar.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 07:48, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!

Thanks for being a tireless defender of Wikipedia's policies and standards. Hope you're finding some time to enjoy life outside the meat-grinder of Wikipedia, though :) Kaldari (talk) 21:14, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Notice

Please read this notification carefully:
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. RGloucester — ☎ 15:27, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

so are you just giving this to everyone who's been editing the page or is this a formal warning based on some action I've taken?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 15:35, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Appears to be everybody. Waiting for mine actually. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 15:47, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

It's informational-only, not a warning based on problematic actions. It's pretty standard to notify every involved editor about active DS; IMO it's better to blanket-notify everyone so there's no surprise down the line. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 16:12, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

All I know is that I checked the site on mobile before and didn't get any message, and I checked the sanctions page and my name was not yet listed, but then I turn my computer on and it's there.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 16:15, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

It isn't a warning at all, as Salvidrim! said. Please read WP:AC/DS#Awareness and alerts. RGloucester — ☎ 18:51, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

The timing was just a little off.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 18:58, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

You too can notify editors, if you follow the procedure at WP:GS/GG. It is merely a necessary evil in this circumstance. RGloucester — ☎ 19:02, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

It seems like a worthless effort considering every time Loganmac posts to Reddit it just gets more accounts to notify.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 19:04, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

@RGloucester: Do you just copy and paste this or is there a template so we can inform yet another POV pusher?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 01:26, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

RGloucester gave you the link to the template and the sanction instructions, what more do you want? Dreadstar ☥ 23:19, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

I did not see it at the linked site at the time.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 23:21, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

And do you now, or did you need more details as in the below? I really want to make sure there's enough detail in the 'copy and pasted' template to guide editors to the details. Dreadstar ☥ 23:24, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

I just wanted to know if there was a preset template so I could, as suggested to me above, to give out the notifications myself. Who pissed in your wheaties?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 23:25, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

I think you did, several times; but not as many as some others on the GG list. :) Dreadstar ☥ 23:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't get your ping. Please use {{subst:Gamergate GS notification}}. There is no need to sign it. Just add the "|sig=yes" parameter, and copy that code and add it to a user's talk page. Make sure, however, that you log the notification at WP:GS/GG, and also that you follow the procedure specified by WP:AC/DS#Awareness and alerts. RGloucester — ☎ 23:20, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 23:21, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Answers to your edit summary questions on the gamergate page

1. I left it out because it was basically just repeating everything that Kyle Orland said in a different voice, I didn't really think throwing in a second opinion was necessary. 2. I fucked it up, sorry :( Kaciemonster (talk) 23:03, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Two people coming to the same opinion, especially one who is not involved (AFAIK) is useful. And it's understandable.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 23:06, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Article talk pages

Do not discuss other editors on article talk pages per WP:TPNO, WP:CIV and WP:NPA - follow WP:CONDUCTDISPUTE instead. If you persist you risk being banned from the GamerGate articles per Wikipedia:General sanctions/Gamergate. Dreadstar ☥ 04:59, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Understood.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 05:01, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. And if others talk about you, then don't respond there, just bring it to me and I'll redact and warn them the very same. The GG General sanction gives admins wide latitude for dealing with anything out of line on those articles. Be careful.... Dreadstar ☥ 05:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Most of the accusations are flying at the ArbCom page now though.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 05:26, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

That's a suitable place, certainly not on the article talk page. Dreadstar ☥ 05:30, 29 October 2014 (UTC)