User talk:SDSU-Prepper
Welcome to SDSU-Prepper Talk Page[edit]
The namesake is from my alma matter where I earned a bachelor of science degree and a bachelor of arts degree. I'm an entrepreneur who enjoys politics and preparedness. SDSU-Prepper (talk) 20:37, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
If you would like to start a conversation, please title a new section with the name of the Wikipedia page. SDSU-Prepper (talk) 12:12, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Archives[edit]
I've archived content to clear my talk space. If you have any questions, please review User talk:SDSU-Prepper/Archives 1 [1] Thank you! SDSU-Prepper (talk) 20:37, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Survivalism[edit]
Dear User talk:199.119.235.176 It was not a typo:
- Biotic: relates to living things (e.g., in their ecological relations).
- Abiotic: is physical rather than biological (and not derived from living organisms).
Let me know if you have any questions. SDSU-Prepper (talk) 21:49, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Neutrality[edit]
I favor neutrality! As a reminder:
- No article on Wikipedia is owned by any editor.
- No personal attacks.
- I find these resources useful:
- I also found this statement somewhere on Wikipedia and I found it helpful in regards to neutrality. "If you make an enforcement request or comment on a request, your own conduct may be examined as well, and you may be sanctioned for it.” Cheers!
SDSU-Prepper (talk) 12:06, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Antifa[edit]
I reverted your edit (again) since, wittingly or not, you stuck the "domestic terrorism" thing back in. If you were trying to make the Newsweek article verify that, well, on that topic that article verifies only that Sessions categorized the right-wing violence in Charlottesville as domestic terrorism. One could call that ironic. Drmies (talk) 04:18, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Dear Drmies, Someone keeps erasing the citation. Here you go. I will insert it. https://www.newsweek.com/are-antifa-terrorists-658396 2601:647:200:A396:7448:E5DD:7D95:CBC7 (talk) 04:31, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
- Dear IP editor: someone keeps misplacing it in their haste to revert, placing incorrect ref tags elsewhere. Note also that the Newsweek article doesn't support the claim. Thanks though, I appreciate it. Drmies (talk) 04:36, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Drmies (talk) 04:36, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Would you please explain what this means? I believe there is a three revert rule, which you've violated. I've been working hard to gain consensus. Today I noticed that someone added a bit about domestic terrorism and it just so happened that I was researching with the Department of Homeland Security. I am an American concerned that foreign actors are trying to infiltrate our election system. It's not just Russia, but it's China, the U.K., etc.
SDSU-Prepper (talk) 04:51, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
- What what means? No, I didn't violate 3R. No, you've made a ton of sometimes barely intelligible posts to the talk page, some of which were hatted as forum posts, and others gained no traction at all. No, the UK is not infiltrating our system, but that's entirely irrelevant, and you shouldn't listen to all you see on YouTube. As for the Department of Homeland Security, they aren't the one single authority, and if you read the BBC and Newsweek articles properly you'd see that they are actually entirely wishy-washy, with the word "reportedly" appearing time and time again. What what means? I reported you and the private's edits on ANI, for the attention of other administrators, that's all. You're adding unverified content likely guided by a POV, and if you want to prevent foreign actors from messing around here, there's better things to do than picking fights on a website. Drmies (talk) 04:59, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Dear Drmies, Please refrain from: WP:PA -- Personal attack that my work and user talk is "barely intelligible"
WP:BULLY -- false accusations, POV railroading, wiki hounding,
WP:POV railroad -- policy misuse, pile-ons, incivility
WP:Civility -- always trying to riducle my comments.
These are your three reverts in direct succession, which is edit warring:
1 (cur | prev) 04:10, 11 August 2018 Drmies (talk | contribs) . . (48,042 bytes) (-100) . . (Reverted to revision 854407975 by Newimpartial (talk): No, the BBC ref doesn's say that at all. (TW)) (Tag: Undo)
2 (cur | prev) 04:13, 11 August 2018 Drmies (talk | contribs) . . (48,042 bytes) (-100) . . (Reverted to revision 854409096 by Drmies (talk): No, you also reinstated, without verification, the "domestic terrorism" ruse. be more careful please. (TW)) (Tag: Undo) (cur | prev) 04:12, 11 August 2018
3 (cur | prev) 04:28, 11 August 2018 Drmies (talk | contribs) . . (48,042 bytes) (-100) . . (Reverted 1 edit by 154thTN Pvt. Seth Adam: Last time for me. need an admin to look at this in the light of DS. again: the BBC ref (or the misplaced Newsweek ref) IN NO WAY support this. (TW)) (Tag: Undo)
SDSU-Prepper (talk) 07:16, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
August 2018[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – Joe (talk) 07:50, 11 August 2018 (UTC)This accusation is entirely false and excuse: I was not making a legal threat: I was discussing antifa and the Department of Homeland Security: https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/8-17-metrics.pdf SDSU-Prepper (talk) 07:52, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
- Do not make legal threats on Wikipedia. A legal threat, in this context, is a threat to engage in an external (real life) legal or other governmental process that would target other editors.
- "Let's also invite The Department of Homeland Security to investigate the contributors of the page!" Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:54, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
https://fox40.com/2017/09/01/department-of-homeland-security-fbi-consider-antifas-activities-as-domestic-terrorist-violence/ https://www.theepochtimes.com/antifa-extremists-listed-as-domestic-terrorists-in-confidential-fbi-dhs-documents_2290447.html There are many more sources http://redalertpolitics.com/2017/07/03/new-jerseys-homeland-security-office-declares-antifa-a-terrorist-group/ https://www.opslens.com/2017/09/01/fbi-homeland-security-call-antifa-domestic-terrorists-warn-future-attacks/ https://www.muckrock.com/news/archives/2018/apr/10/dhss-antifa-neonazi-CA-rundown/ https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/antifa-domestic-terrorists-us-security-agencies-homeland-security-fbi-a7927881.html SDSU-Prepper (talk) 08:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
https://www.dhs.gov/how-do-i/report-suspicious-activity
SDSU-Prepper (talk) 08:32, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
NOTICE TO JOE: "Rather than immediately blocking users who post apparent threats, administrators should first seek to clarify the user's intention if there is doubt. Blocking for legal threats is generally not such an urgent need that it must be done before determining whether an ambiguous statement was genuinely a threat of legal action."
Perceived legal threat. Rather than immediately blocking users who post apparent threats, administrators should first seek to clarify the user's intention, if there is any doubt.
No one seeked to clarify with me. I never posted a legal threat. References to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) were in context of antifa. https://www.njhomelandsecurity.gov/analysis/anarchist-extremists-antifa SDSU-Prepper (talk) 08:45, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
SDSU-Prepper (talk) 08:45, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
SDSU-Prepper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
No one seeked to clarify with me. My understanding is that rather than immediately blocking users who post apparent threats, administrators should first seek to clarify the user's intention if there is doubt. I never posted a legal threat. References to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) were in context of antifa. https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/8-17-metrics.pdf https://www.njhomelandsecurity.gov/analysis/anarchist-extremists-antifa.SDSU-Prepper (talk) 08:51, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your call for DHS to investigate users ("Let's also invite The Department of Homeland Security to investigate the contributors of the page!") is a legal threat. You will need to withdraw this in order to be unblocked. I am declining this request. I'm also concerned you are WP:NOTHERE. 331dot (talk) 08:59, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180811090055/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SDSU-Prepper
SDSU-Prepper (talk) 09:01, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
- If you want to make a new unblock request, you should paste it at the bottom of the page and not put it inside the block message as you did here. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:03, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
I have recorded this and it seems to disappear. No worries as I have archived the data at the link below:
SDSU-Prepper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
No one seeked to clarify with me. My understanding is that rather than immediately blocking users who post apparent threats, administrators should first seek to clarify the user's intention if there is doubt. Blocking for legal threats is generally not such an urgent need that it must be done before determining whether an ambiguous statement was genuinely a threat of legal action. I never posted a legal threat. References to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) were in context of antifa and using DHS as a resource, for example: https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/8-17-metrics.pdf I would submit that I am concerned about foreign agents meddling in our election and politics. It's not just Russia, but China, Germany, and even Scandinavia and the UK. It wouldn't be difficult for the DHS to use an IP address to identify (you know, if you see something you should say something?). I am in close proximity with the antifa community and as an American, I feel that it's dangerous for foreign actors to infiltrate the tapestry of our political landscape. Have fun storming the castle! SDSU-Prepper (talk) 09:06, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Of all the things that has been explained to you, you have managed to listen to nothing. Your intention is quite clear, so let me add another reminder: Wikipedia is not a soapbox. As you are being disruptive with your unblock requests, your talk page access has been revoked. You will have to appeal through Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System for your next request. Alex Shih (talk) 09:32, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180811090055/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SDSU-Prepper SDSU-Prepper (talk) 09:06, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Have fun storming the castle! WP:BULLY WP:POV railroad You can't change history. SDSU-Prepper (talk) 09:11, 11 August 2018 (UTC)