User talk:SL93/Archive 3

Dynarch Javascript calendar[edit]

Hello. It's ok to delete the article. Amux (talk) 23:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bryn Magnus[edit]

You did a search for an AFD that showed he was notable. Can you please write a stub so we can merge and/or redirect Love Horse there? = Mgm|^(talk) 13:37, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mason Moore[edit]

Sir, As per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mason Moore for Mason Moore , the reason stated "No significant coverage" and non compliance with WP:PORNBIO, but i would like to express my view over the issue, That i had gone through the Actress profile well, Though she is new to this genre,but still She has been covered significant under what exactly we call for Porn actress, she is not an actress from Hollywood, so we might call for significant status for her. As stated in WP:PORNBIO, Though she had not won a well-known award, such as those listed in Category:Pornographic film awards or Category:Film awards. but she had been covered & nominated in AVN Awards like that of AVN Hall of Fame. & she had contributed a lot in Porn Industry at such a little time. Well the aforementioned details are formalised, & the informal one is that, i am new to wikipedia, & would to like contribute for my lifetime, so i am looking for your positive response over this issue, Please assist me. Thanks. ( Abu Torsam 12:05, 13 December 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Ophélie Bretnacher[edit]

Hello, is it normal, that Hell in a Bucket notifie that "that time is not now" at 15:24, 12 December 2009 (UTC) than the discussion ins't closed, and it can maybe change, if other people want to KEEP this article ? Raymondnivet (talk) 11:05, 13 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymondnivet (talk • contribs)

Speedy deletion declined: HazeMD[edit]

Hello Joe Chill, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of HazeMD - a page you tagged - because: Not a copyvio - Wiki page predates SonicRetro page by 9 months see http://info.sonicretro.org/index.php?title=HazeMD&action=history. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Nancy ^talk 12:10, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Beethoven's relatives[edit]

Just to let you know that both articles have now been re-listed, with the request to clarify each editor's present position. --Jubilee♫clipman 00:01, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obsession (band)[edit]

I expanded that article, take a look again please.--Canniba loki 03:12, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays[edit]

File:Father Winter Solstice.jpg

Ret.Prof (talk) 13:46, 17 December 2009 (UTC) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hannukah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone![reply]

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec09}} to your friends' talk pages.

MarineMeat (2nd nom)[edit]

Hi. I improperly closed the previous AfD, and there is a second AfD going on. Since you commented on the first, maybe you are interested to comment in this one. Thanks. --Cyclopia ^talk 21:52, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays[edit]

Kinda glad Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Another Side of Peace (film) relisted so I could research it. I commented at the AFD Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:47, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Genius? I blush. I just used my google-foo and searched for the filmmakers, remembering that WP:NF offers many other ways to consider notability other than box ofice and press hype. Thanks and keep warm. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:13, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eagle Electric[edit]

I added some references to Eagle Electric. You may want to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eagle Electric. I searched for "Eagle Electric Manufacturing" so as to exclude hits for unrelated things named "Eagle Electric". -- Eastmain (talk) 18:47, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MS Paint Adventures[edit]

Thank you for the support. It has been a little frustrating. My best to you... ttonyb (talk) 20:27, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Afd[edit]

Fixed, thanks for catching that. Wizardman 14:03, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TestLink article deleted[edit]

I apologize for bothering you ... I find out that you didn't delete the page. I have not had time to study syntax there before. It's not too friendly for lamas. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Havlatm (talk • contribs) 23:28, 21 December 2009 (UTC) Thank you for your support. Havlatm (talk) 10:25, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Autoreviewer[edit]

Hi, after reading one of your articles at newpage patrol, I was surprised to see that an editor who has contributed as many new articles as you have hadn't already been approved as an wp:Autoreviewer. So I've taken the liberty of rectifying that. Ϣere SpielChequers 17:07, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

retag for deletion: page on George Bradt[edit]

Just noticed that the page on George Bradt (me) has been re-tagged for possible deletion. There was a whole discussion around this in November and you closed the discussion with a Keep decision. During that discussion others modified the article to put in more references. Given my clear COI, I'm refraining from touching this page. How does this work? Do we need to re-open the discussion or does the November decision still stand? Gbradt (talk) 11:51, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DELSORT[edit]

Since you nominate and !vote on a fair number of software articles, perhaps you could also add them to the centralized/specialized Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software list. It's pretty easy to do that using User:John Vandenberg/Deletion sorting tool. Thanks. Pcap ping 16:54, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't very nice.[edit]

That seems a bit mean.--AtlanticDeep (talk) 21:38, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ahem... well at least your instincts are right. Merry Christmas! Bearian (talk) 00:51, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See here.[edit]

Fair is fair. You revert my edits and I'll revert yours. :)--AtlanticDeep (talk) 22:43, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Found this...[edit]

http://archives.tcm.ie/waterfordnews/2007/01/19/story24410.asp

Will look for more. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 16:48, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Protip[edit]

http://www.google.com/linux. Thanks for your comment. Pcap ping 06:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The SPI case you filed[edit]

...has been listed and can be found here. Best regards, NW (Talk) 01:23, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion instead of AfD[edit]

Hey. I notice that you nominate a lot of articles about software packages (among other things) for deletion via AfD. Have you considered using WP:PROD for some of these? It would probably make things go a lot more smoothly. The majority of the nominations you make seem truly uncontroversial, but few people are arsed to comment on them, leading to multiple relistings and a clogging up of AfD. If anyone removes the PROD tag, you can just proceed to AfD as usual. Thanks for all the hard work! — æk ^Talk 05:38, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

coming from a somewhat different direction, I'd make the same suggestion. You can do this safely--several of us check every one of them, & if any thing needs discussion, we'll catch it. (the other thing that would help of course is not forgetting to do WP:BEFORE--then a number of the articles wouldn't have to be deleted at all, which is even better.) DGG ( talk ) 05:48, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sergio Sartorelli[edit]

I added a reference to Sergio Sartorelli, and found several mentions of his work as an automobile designer at http://books.google.com/books?q="Sergio Sartorelli" You might want to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergio Sartorelli - Eastmain (talk) 09:24, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New York Rocker[edit]

This magazine did in fact exist. It was a very influential one in the 1970's punk/new wave era judging by it's account in the Village Voice

"In the spring of 1975, more than a year before the release of the Ramones' debut album, Alan Betrock founded the magazine New York Rocker. In doing so, he changed American popular culture forever." http://www.villagevoice.com/2000-04-18/music/music/

Smiloid (talk) 22:16, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BLACK SWARM save[edit]

Thank you for adding those reviews. I am trying to improve pages for a few directors and also create pages for their notable films. I may not be doing it right. Much appreciated. Happy new year! Shelleyk3425 (talk) 00:01, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Safe Passage[edit]

Its original French release name was "Laissez-passer", and IMDB shows it as 2002, not 2001.. so the date will be chalenged per this. Some terrific awards [1], and many reviews [2]. Can I join in on your expansion? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:00, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, SL93. You have new messages at IBen's talk page.
Message added 02:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

iBen^discuss 02:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	For your tireless contributions at WP:AFD. Your hard work is appreciated. Regards, Cocytus [»talk«] 04:57, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I would have put this on your userpage, where I noticed you had other barnstars, but I did not want to edit your userpage without your permission. Feel free to move this there if you'd like to. Regards, Cocytus [»talk«] 04:57, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I second the above sentiments. Your contributions to AFD have been most appreciated. Thank you very much, and long may you continue! Rapido (talk) 12:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Me too. I'd like to congratulate you on your good work. Fleet Command (talk) 13:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

I appreciate your input at King Cobra (film). Its always nice to work with another in improving an article. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:38, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kibaale Community Centre[edit]

I think that Kibaale Community Centre may be notable as a school. The organization does several things, but operating a school is one of them. You may wish to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kibaale Community Centre. - Eastmain (talk) 22:11, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

:I also think the Center is notable - since the nomination for deletion two new references have been added. Greetings, --Kmw2700 (talk) 05:10, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yakubu Mu'azu[edit]

I don't know what to say about your DYK nomination for this article. It is not remotely close to the quality needed for a DYK article. Just a very basic thumbnail bio from grubbing around on the web, with huge gaps. But the news item is unusual, and other sources back it up. Let's see what the response is. Thanks. :~} Aymatth2 (talk) 01:29, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did not mean to sound negative. I am really pleased you nominated the article. I am not proud of it, but I think people like this are really important, and Wikipedia should have much more about them. This will get other editors looking at it and related articles and discussing how to make improvements, and that is really useful. Thanks again. Aymatth2 (talk) 01:53, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Safe Conduct (film)[edit]

On January 10, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Safe Conduct (film), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article[edit]

Any idea when this will be on the main page? I'm out of town until Tuesday, so I don't know if I'll see it before then. Thanks. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 18:12, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 18:16, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hook verification[edit]

Hey, do you think you could look at the hook I posted for DYK and see if it can be verified? I don't know what the procedure is but I posted mine at the bottom of Jan 7 and I think it got overlooked. It's the hook for E-mu Modular System. Thanks! --Andy Walsh (talk) 02:37, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cool thanks. An area I could learn more about, for sure. :) --Andy Walsh (talk) 02:45, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Upper Harz Water Regale[edit]

Joe, Thanks for your help with the DYK. Regards. --Bermicourt (talk) 21:10, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pop Go The Sixties[edit]

I guess that's up to you! This programme was broadcast across Western Europe on January 1, 1970, one of the very few music programmes outside of Eurovision to achieve that distinction. It is also the only UK/German TV entertainment production ever broadcast on BBC1 on prime time. The BBC considered it significant enough to archive, unlike any of the contemporary pop shows, which had their tapes wiped. It has been repeated many times on various channels across the continent. Clips from the show are often used on BBC compilation shows. It was repeated on both BBC4 and Yesterday in January 2010. I think simply because you are not aware of the show shouldn't be grounds for deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TVArchivistUK (talk • contribs) 13:36, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wee Sing Video Series[edit]

Just wanted to say: great job finding sources for this article. I'm not sure why I couldn't find any of them myself - obviously I was doing something wrong. Anyway, you've clearly demonstrated notability here, so I'm withdrawing the AFD. Robofish (talk) 13:46, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/OptiPNG[edit]

looking at that afd, which was kept, it seems to me that not a single keep vote was legitimately based on policy. i believe, therefore, that the article was kept by the admin in error. have you ever started a deletion review? Theserialcomma (talk) 17:43, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Swamp Devil (Bruce Dern)[edit]

must be doing something wrong. Am trying to improve this film's page and just had another two reviews taken down. suggestions for how i can improve this? thanks Shelleyk3425 (talk) 03:43, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They were not "taken down" but moved to the talk page because review links do not go in the external links section. Had you encorporated them into a receiption section, as Joe has now done, that would have been fine. Joe, regarding the question of "since when"[3], WP:ELMAYBE #1 which formerly allowed review links was repealed per consensus on November 6, 2009[4]. Such links should be moved to the talk page, until someone is ready to incorporate them into the reception section as you did. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:42, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You both rock! Thanks very much. I'm a green editor (no kidding) and these are valuable Wiki lessons. Am trying to add good pages for notable films and tv series links but i also want to edit constructively (and accurately) and am new to this. I'm working on improving some notable (and fave) Canadian directors pages: Norman Jewison, David Winning, Jean-Claude Lauzon, Deepa Mehta, Bob Clark, etc., and also some fave movies. Thanks!! Shelleyk3425 (talk) 16:13, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SMPlayer[edit]

This article is now restored; I'm notifying you so you can add the sources you mentioned in the DRV. Thanks. Chick Bowen 03:25, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

inre: Grown Up[edit]

I can understand why you sent the article to AFD... far better than to prod for speedy and more likely to get some ttention. I have already begun cleanup and have found a few more sources. Apparently Joanna Priestley is rather notable for her many award-winning animated films. With the number of awards this one has won, with it being both commercially re-released AND in retrospectives more than 5 years after initial release, I think we can make it a keeper per sources [5], [6], [7]. Wanna help? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:40, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pro and Con[edit]

I can imrpove and source this one as well per [8], [9], and [10]. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:53, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Would you consider...[edit]

A sysop nomination? I think you have achieved a level in which it would be beneficial to the project for you to recieve the sysop tools. Would you like me to nominate you? TheWeakWilled (T * G) 21:16, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Joe Chill TheWeakWilled (T * G) 21:44, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Joe, I think it took some guts to pull out of that RFA. By all accounts, you are an excellent contributor, so if the withdrawal has got you down please know that there are definitely people out here who respect your work. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) ^talk 14:02, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Joe, I didn't see your RFA until just now. If you decide to run again in the future, I'd recommend spending more time getting a thorough nomination that emphasizes your strengths, and spending more time developing thorough answers to the questions. For example, I reviewed your contributions and one of the most valuable things you do, verifying hooks at DYK, isn't even mentioned in your RFA answers. That work shows that you are capable of examining and vetting text, and that you can carefully apply guidelines and policies—a skill set that is completely missing from your nomination and answers. --Andy Walsh (talk) 16:17, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I also didn't see your RfA until after it was closed. Sorry it didn't go so well, been there and know how it feels. Keep up the good work you do. J04n(talk page) 10:45, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sorry that folded before I got round to checking your contributions. Having seen you at AFD and noticed your writing before, I'd be surprised if you hadn't met my RFA standards. If it is any consolation my first attempt failed, but four months later my second succeeded. Ϣere SpielChequers 17:22, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RFA[edit]

Just FYI, I meant what i said in my support. I think in some cases you werent given a good break with the opposition ( especially after being accused of a self nomination......) at any rate dont let the process get to you. Just take some time for yourself and keep up the work on the wiki project :) Ottawa4ever (talk) 14:05, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Joe Chill might not have been thought too soon had you gone ahead and spoken of the usernames you had to abandon due to problems caused you by others. There's sure nothing negative in letting folks know that you've been contributing longer than just as Joe Chill... explaining that the numbers here or articles created here are not representative of your total contributions. And whatever happened to your DYK for Safe Conduct (film)? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:17, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

just FYI there appears to be a message for you on my talk [11]. Dont worry over communication. I find in wikipedia it does improve with time regardless with what people think. Happy editing Ottawa4ever (talk) 19:06, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it did not work out, but try again in a few months. You are continuing to improve. Bearian (talk) 23:24, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is really belated, but I noticed your contributions at ANI and came and checked out your talk page, and thought that you should think about maybe trying RfA. Then I found your actual RfA. :( Sorry about that experience, but I concur that you should give it another thought at a future time. -- Atama頭 23:18, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Capitaine Conan[edit]

On January 19, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Capitaine Conan, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:00, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Xeromphalina campanella[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Xeromphalina campanella at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Beloved Freak 22:29, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Liberty Kid[edit]

On January 22, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Liberty Kid, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw[edit]

Many thanks for the withdraw -- I appreciate it. Sorry if DGG sounded snipey; I'm sometimes so myself at AfDs in a similar manner. No doubt you felt the brunt of others' failure to do any wp:before search before nominating ... as you know, that happens from time to time. But I for one am clear that you made a good faith effort. And I appreciate your demonstrating your good faith w/the withdraw ... some nom's refuse to do so, for whatever reason.--Epeefleche (talk) 00:16, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My google-foo strikes again...[edit]

In Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Con Artist the big problem is that the name The Con Artist is less than a month old. When I did searches under its original title The Love Child, I struck gold... Film's completed. Lots of sources. Article fixed. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:48, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Yakubu_Mu'azu[edit]

Hello Joe Chill. Can you take a look at the article Yakubu_Mu'azu that is nominated at DYK. It does not appear to me to be written in a matter ready for promotion yet. In opinions would be appreciated. Kindly Calmer Waters 11:18, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Clavariadelphus truncatus[edit]

On January 23, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Clavariadelphus truncatus, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:01, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Envisage[edit]

The call you made on that one was PROD, but since the same user created several pages at about the same time all promoting the same organization, I decided to go with db-promo. I'll be happy to change it back to PROD if you see some hope that something good could come. (This just happened a few minutes ago, but I'll restore the deleted content if you need to see it again.) (Watching) - Dank (push to talk) 17:25, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sound Ideas DYK[edit]

Hi Joe,

Thanks for reviewing my recent DYK nomination. I fixed the problem you pointed out (after exclaiming in amazement that I didn't cite the hook) and hope you will take a second peek.--otherl left 17:25, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:DYK[edit]

Great, thanks. The Flash ^{talk} 23:17, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yakubu Mu'azu[edit]

You were right and I was wrong. That is great! Thanks, Aymatth2 (talk) 01:19, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Girls[edit]

Thanks for the added info and DYK nom - AKeen (talk) 04:14, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, SL93. You have new messages at Innotata's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—innotata (Talk • Contribs) 18:15, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied again. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 18:22, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 19:28, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tag Reviews[edit]

Hi Joe, what is the current procedure for getting tags reviewed and or removed. i've been trying to improve some articles and address the tag issues, etc. but how much is enough? thanks Shelleyk3425 (talk) 00:39, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, i think others may have tried that but they get replaced. Think they may be doing it incorrectly. trying to follow procedure :) Shelleyk3425 (talk) 00:45, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

appreciate the response. so my opinion counts too ha ha :) What drew me to this in the first place was the tag invite to improve articles right at the top banner. Learning this has been a challenge. I may misunderstand but the point of editing and improving articles is to address the tag problems so they're better more accurate, properly referenced and unbiased etc. so if i think my editing has addressed tag concerns and remove them and they get replaced then what? I guess give up and let somebody else edit it :). thanks again Shelleyk3425 (talk) 00:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Alan Parastaev[edit]

On January 25, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Alan Parastaev, which you recently nominated. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK Project (nominate) 06:00, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Note: All that I did was nominate this. Joe Chill (talk) 14:10, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SL93. You have new messages at Saqib Qayyum's talk page. -- ~~~~~

DYK for Yakubu Mu'azu[edit]

On January 25, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Yakubu Mu'azu, which you recently nominated. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All that I did was nominate this. Joe Chill (talk) 14:10, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

Hello, SL93. You have new messages at HJ Mitchell's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DYK - Seagate Castle[edit]

Thanks for the nomination. Rosser Gruffydd 16:50, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Potlatch[edit]

I've approved your nomination.

BTW, if you want to return the favor I have a nomination just below yours.

--Mcorazao (talk) 18:17, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Teechart[edit]

Wow, that was a fast response you gave. Anyway, I think you accidently hit five ~s instead of four, since only a timestamp appeared after your vote. You might want to change that. Them From Space 03:17, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of dlib c++ library article[edit]

I supposed I missed the boat on this. It was on my watch list but I guess that doesn't mean you get an email about any of this? Anyway, there are a number of things on google:

Some codeproject article used it: http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cpp/ess.aspx
The understand your code guys index it: http://understandyourcode.com/uts/index.php
It's listed here: http://www.kdnuggets.com/software/libraries.html
It's also published in a peer reviewed journal: http://jmlr.csail.mit.edu/papers/v10/king09a.html
People (other than me) consider it notable enough to add links to it in other wikipedia articles (like the Boost article)

Perhaps these things should have been in the article? Davis685 (talk) 22:09, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cited needed at Hello Girls[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Hello Girls at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Binksternet (talk) 08:14, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for GNU Oleo[edit]

On January 28, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article GNU Oleo, which you recently nominated. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:01, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Note: All that I did was nominate this. Joe Chill (talk) 21:31, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Suillus tomentosus[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Suillus tomentosus at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Intelligentsium 04:30, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Xeromphalina campanella[edit]

On January 29, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Xeromphalina campanella, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wikiproject: Did you know? 06:00, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

ANI[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Hello, SL93. You have new messages at Seb az86556's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Resolved. Bearian (talk) 03:22, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And of course, now the Reaper is gonna come out of nowhere and kill the poor guy. Thanks. Thanks a lot. HalfShadow 03:26, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. Bearian (talk) 03:37, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooke Gunning[edit]

Good catch. Bearian (talk) 03:19, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Under what evidence.[edit]

Do you place me to be John254? Andrew the Assasin (talk) 16:04, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

		The PCHS-NJROTC Abuse Report and Antivandal Barnstar
		Good luck with the User:John254 issues

PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 03:20, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Crepidotus mollis[edit]

On February 1, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Crepidotus mollis, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:00, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dillon Dougherty[edit]

Either you or I should take this to deletion review. As it is not a subject field I work in much,& as I am already in a rather complicated dialog with the closing admin, probably better you. DGG ( talk ) 21:50, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for R.W.G. Dennis[edit]

On February 3, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article R.W.G. Dennis, which you recently nominated. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:01, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Note: All that I did was nominate this. Joe Chill (talk) 00:22, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you may be interested[edit]

In the discussion here as you were part of the original afd. 16x9 (talk) 02:33, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Protected your user page[edit]

Just to inform you I have protected your user page for 24 hours to try put off the block-evading IPs who continually vandalise it. Feel free to undo prior to the expiry as you see fit. Hope this helps, --Taelus (talk) 20:59, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hello Girls[edit]

On February 4, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hello Girls, which you recently nominated. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Gymnothorax pictus[edit]

On February 4, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gymnothorax pictus, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:00, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gymnothorax pictus[edit]

Google sometimes mislabels books. You linked what was labelled as book on Japanese, but it actually displayed the pages of a Chamorro dictionary; títugi is a Chamorro word. You might want to doublecheck next time. --Ywkgagbk (talk) 06:53, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Seagate Castle[edit]

On February 5, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Seagate Castle, which you recently nominated. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Potlatch River[edit]

On February 5, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Potlatch River, which you recently nominated. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

Thanks for your nomination, it's totally fine (at least the article was read by someone :) ), though I will expand it a little bit more. Regards. Grenouille vert (talk) 02:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]