User talk:S Carlson Wood

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Labberton (December 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 22:58, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! S Carlson Wood, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 22:58, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark Labberton[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mark Labberton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSK (t • c) 20:15, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@S Carlson Wood; I've denied the speedy deletion request, as this person in my opinion easily surpasses Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)#Specific_criteria_notes #6. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:23, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Labberton[edit]

I've removed the "Education and Career" section you added to this article. Significant components of it are nearly word for word copies of copyrighted text from other sources. I'm sorry, but this isn't acceptable. Please see this helpful page; Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources and this essay; Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. If you have questions, ask. I'll be happy to work with you. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:06, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft or not, you can NOT copy/paste text from another source as you have done again. I am happy to work with you, but this MUST stop. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:27, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Labberton, Mark.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Labberton, Mark.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

S Carlson Wood; I'm sorry but we can not accept images under a license of "permission for Wikipedia use". Such a status is incompatible with our licensing requirements. There are two broad categories of acceptable images on Wikipedia; (1) non-free images that are used under fair use and inline with our policy at Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria, and (2) images that are available under a free license. With respect to the former (1) case, we will not accept a non-free image of Dr. Labberton. Our policies strictly forbid the use of non-free images for depiction purposes of a person who is alive, unless that person is incarcerated likely for life, on the run from the law or is a noted recluse as confirmed by secondary sources. Since Dr. Labberton is none of those things, we can not accept a non-free image of him.

As to the latter (2) case, we can accept an image of him if it is made available under a free license. The image you have uploaded is taken from this source, and is very likely property of Fuller Theological Seminary. Therefore, in order for the image to be acceptable here, it would need to be released under a free license by Fuller Theological Seminary. You can request such a release by carefully following the instructions at Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. I am happy to help you do this if you need assistance. Understand; we can not make assumptions about the copyright status of an image, or go only on the word of any editor here. We must have proof. Let me know if you have questions. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and pasting[edit]

We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:44, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

http://thethrivecenter.org/research/research-projects/spiritual-exemplars-global-perspectives-on-spiritual-development-among-diverse-adolescents/ among others

October 2016[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:50, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]