User talk:S Seagal

License tagging for Image:Ad1a.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ad1a.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:58, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Ajaymig.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ajaymig.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:58, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Shaheen2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Shaheen2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:08, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Pakistani Nationalism[edit]

I have added your request to the See also area of the main Pakistan artice. --Fast track 00:51, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not capitalize[edit]

your edit summaries. It is a sign of incivility. Read WP:Civility plz. If you harass users with bogus allegations of vandalism over content dispute then you will be reported.Hkelkar

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on a page. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. Ryūlóng 04:54, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool down Seagal.Don't be angry and act like your famous namesake in movies. Why don't you go ahead and discuss these controversial edits before putting them in? You may have worked hard on the edits and I appreciate your efforts. However, they are POV and totally unsourced. You should have done them in little bit by little bit and discussed them at length. We are all reasonable people and will give you full good faith. Talk about this won't you?Hkelkar 05:00, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and by the way, there is an active debate progressing on Indian Nationalism over several edits there. If you feel that there is a "Double Standard" at work here then please participate in that debate meaningfully.Hkelkar 05:06, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you don't own any of the articles on wikipedia regardless of whether you started it or not. See WP:OWN.Hkelkar 05:48, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not following wikipedia policy[edit]

Will get you blocked. Answer my questions first.Hkelkar 05:05, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

where on the indo-bangladesh war talk page? ive already been there.

S Seagal 05:06, 21 October 2006 (UTC)S Seagal[reply]

NPA[edit]

Make another personal attack and you will be blocked. I guarantee it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indo-Bangladesh_War_of_2001&diff=82763714&oldid=82762589

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by administrators or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you.

Hkelkar 05:06, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very well[edit]

You have made a reasonable case for keeping the name "War" there so I will accede on that note.Hkelkar 05:23, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Status quo ante bellum is fine in both cases. I have made both changes.Hkelkar 05:39, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hkelkar,

Actually I think i tried making those changes to the kargil war page before namely from 'India regains kargil' to Status quo ante bellum but it was changed by bot or someone.

Status quo ante bellum is an official term, the 1965 indo-pak war should also have that as outcome.

Yes I agree. I will make the changes and watch the article(s). If somebody tries any monkey business there then they'll have to deal with me.Hkelkar 06:15, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 12 hours[edit]

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

Stifle (talk) 21:28, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Project Pakistan[edit]

The project Page for Pakistan has been started Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan plese join it so that we all could benifit from your input thankyou Hussain 08:52, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Pakistan[edit]

I encourage your NPOV actions and sourcing. However, the article Criticism of Hinduism is about the religion, not the Indian state, neither the Hindutvavaadis. Also know that many Indian Muslims (of which there are approx. 150 million) also bear Anti-Pakistani sentiment due to aggression in Kashmir and killing of Bengalis. Many Indian Muslims lost loved ones in wars between India and Pakistan. — Nobleeagle ^[TALK] [C] 06:30, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We should move the sourced information to the Hindu Nationalism page, Its more suited there. That aside I have started a new article Anti-Pakistani sentiment which I plan to expand considerably.

Thanks S Seagal 14:09, 5 March 2007 (UTC)S Seagal[reply]

AfD nomination of Pakistanphobia[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Pakistanphobia, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistanphobia. Thank you. Soman (talk) 19:52, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recreating deleted articles[edit]

You recently recreated this deleted article as Anti-Pakistani sentiment. This is a criterion for speedy deletion (General criteria #4) and the new article has, as such, been tagged for speedy deletion. If you believe that the article should not have been deleted, you can request a deletion review. If you continue to recreate deleted articles, you may be blocked for disruptive editing. --Icarus ^(Hi!) 23:02, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks[edit]

With regard to your comments on User_talk:Icarus3: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Icarus ^(Hi!) 23:18, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your name has been mentioned at Wikipedia:Administrators' Noticeboard/Incidents[edit]

Hello S Seagal. Your name has been mentioned in this dicussion at WP:AN/I. You are welcome to join in there and give your own opinion. EdJohnston (talk) 00:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008[edit]

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. — Coren ^(talk) 01:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anti Pakistan Sentiment[edit]

Hi S Seagal. I saw that you recreated the anti Pakistan sentiment article, which was deleted again. You might want to consider appealing at Wikipedia:Deletion_review. Here are some links that mention the term "anti Pakistan sentiment", [1], [2], [3], [4][5], [6], I dont know if these were in the article. Also Google Books shows the ter being mentioned in 32 books [7]. Noor Aalam (talk) 19:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Anti-Pakistani sentiment[edit]

An editor has nominated Anti-Pakistani sentiment, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Pakistani sentiment (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:59, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you are reminded not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Wikireader41 (talk) 01:46, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dont post on my page against or ill report you for harassment. S Seagal (talk) 01:48, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

go right ahead. If you keep violating WP:NPA you will find yourself blocked.--Wikireader41 (talk) 21:32, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Wikireader41 (talk) 19:19, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Muslim and Anti-Pakistan edits?[edit]

Hi there, Since you seem to have edited Pakistan-related topics, I wonder if you would look at edits of HotWinters (talk · contribs), who, in my view, has been making somewhat Anti-Muslim and Anti-Pakistani edits in various pages such as Mughal Empire and Template:History of South Asia. I could be wrong of course, so it would be good if someone else took a look at them. I did make a post at the Noticeboard for India related topics, but couldn't find any admin to look at it. Regards, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 06:18, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

South Asian list[edit]

Please participate in the discussion on Talk: List of South Asian inventions and discoveries. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 15:22, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:MuktijuddoPosters2a.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:MuktijuddoPosters2a.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:08, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:MuktijuddoPosters2a.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:MuktijuddoPosters2a.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 19:36, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vote on article name[edit]

Hello. You are invited to take part in a 'Gordion knot vote' with three options on the future title of List of Indian inventions and discoveries. Regards Gun Powder Ma (talk) 09:42, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan national movement[edit]

Hi S Seagal! I am just getting in touch to let you know that I have created the article Pakistan national movement. I think that You can help to improve it. I would appreciate any assistance you could provide in improving this article. Regards Averroist (talk) 15:32, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]