User talk:Sabine retina

AfC notification: Draft:Botond Roska has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Botond Roska. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:58, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

I also left a comment, but you weren't automatically notified. -- I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 22:33, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Botond Roska (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Botond Roska and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Botond Roska, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 16:20, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello, IOB communications! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SamHolt6 (talk) 16:20, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

 Thank you. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:43, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Sabine retina (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

sabine retina (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

was not aware of the policy, am happy to change to personal account name IOB communications (talk) 17:57, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Renamed and unblocked. A reminder, you've been violating WP:COI and WP:PAID, along with possibly WP:PROMO, and need to read and understand and comply with those policies before editing further. So long as you avoid editing about IOB and any other subject areas for which you have a conflict of interest, you should be okay. Happy editing! Yamla (talk) 18:01, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Botond Roska has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Botond Roska. Thanks! CNMall41 (talk) 05:36, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Dear Reviewer, Thank you for your comment to Draft:Botond Roska on July 2. 2019, asking whether I deny being 'paid' by Botond Roska to promote him. I do not. Botond Roska is one of two co-directors of the IOB foundation, an academic institute for molecular and clinical ophthalmology research in Basel, Switzerland. I am the part-time communications manager of this academic institution. So yes, in a way he indirectly pays me, as next to our Board of Trustees he is one of the decision makers when it comes to assigning Foundation money to specific roles and responsibilities.

When I published his profile draft under a user name which made this very transparent, then I was told by one of the first reviewers this is against your rules and I should choose a user name which 'hides' my affiliation. I did, even though I have no reason to deny my affiliation at all, am happy to make this fully transparent for everyone at all times. Sabine-retina aka sabine.rosta@iob.ch

I'm not trying to 'promote' a 'wanna-be' scientist or someone seeking the international limelight. Botond Roska is being internationally recognized, there's really not need for any kind of questionable promotion. It is just a matter of making an entry in an index. Several people asked me why they cannot find him on wikipedia in English, while there's a German page, that's why I set up this EN draft.

Sabine retina (talk) 16:59, 2 July 2019 (UTC) July 2, 2019

No one has asked if you are paid to "promote him." Your answers have skirted the question until now. Even being paid indirectly falls under WP:PAID. Based on your comment above, doing this is part of your job with the organization and as such would require you to make the appropriate disclosures. Please follow the link to PAID above and make the appropriate disclosures in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:08, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Botond Roska has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Botond Roska. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:28, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Botond Roska (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Botond Roska and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Botond Roska, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 06:14, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Botond Roska concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Botond Roska, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Botond Roska

Hello, Sabine retina. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Botond Roska".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 21:34, 25 February 2020 (UTC)