Jump to content

User talk:Sachipsharma/sandbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Peer Review[edit]

Lead Section

The lead section is to the point and concise. It does a great job of providing a overview for what I can expect to read in the rest of the article by referencing the subsequent sections in some capacity. I think including a sentence that details the importance of the Guaymas Basin/why it is of interest to the scientific/geographic community could make this section more captivating. Also, briefly expanding on some of the scientific jargon in simpler terms could make this section easier to read.

Structure

I think the organization of this article makes sense and follows the order they were introduced in the lead sections which I thought was a good touch. The "Formation" section was a little confusing to read, and I think more obviously spelling out the effect of sedimentation occurring at the site of the basin could make this section much smoother. The whole Hydrothermal Circulation Section is excellent, so no notes there. I like how to briefly defined the term and its relevance to your article topic. It was very clear and interesting to read. Same with the "Biology" section, I think it read very well and it was a good topic to include.

Balance of Coverage

I think the article has a good balance of coverage and each section is pretty equal in size. I think including additional information on the "Formation" section could further this goal.

Neutrality

The entirety of this article has a very neutral and scientific tone to it. The writing throughout flows pretty well, although the lead section does seem to read more abrupt than the other sections. I found the article to be pretty captivating despite its neutral tone, so great work there.

Sources

There are quite a few sources and all of them appear to be reliable. I think there is a good balance of information from all the sources cited. There were a quite few unsourced statements in the article that would definitely benefit from having a citation attached to them to help support the credibility of the article.

Awesome job overall! MsEditor113 (talk) 02:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]