User talk:SafariScribe/2024/March

ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

• Added as a courtesy because the user raising the matter at ANI hasn't done it. Neiltonks (talk) 11:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks Neiltonks. I appreciate that. Otuọcha (talk) 12:17, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Doug Van Gundy on Who wants to be a millionaire.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Doug Van Gundy on Who wants to be a millionaire.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 22:44, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give What the Dead Men Say a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into What the Dead Men Say (novella). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:46, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

Galobtter (talk) 19:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:Josh Dickson (American political advisor).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Josh Dickson (American political advisor).jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 20:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:Samuel Ode.png

Thanks for uploading File:Samuel Ode.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 20:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Vanilla

Read angiosperm or pollination. Literally every flowering plant must be pollinated; the statement "Pollination is required..." is no more useful than "Sufficient sunlight is required..." Since you quoted something I missed, you should have removed this utterly worthless statement instead of merely undoing my error. 123.51.107.94 (talk) 00:21, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello! You probably may be new to Wikipedia. I will advise you begin with menial editing like grammar, correction et cetera than removals, etc. Adding pollination should not be specific/limited to hand-pollination whereas the source analysed artificial like bee & other animal pollination. Leaving the pollination as it was is deemed fit to bear both natural and artificial as the case may be. All the best. Otuọcha (talk) 00:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Audience scores are not allowed

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be harmful and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated harm may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. As I clearly explained in my edit summary Rotten Tomatoes audience scores are not allowed WP:UGC. You are being disruptive by restoring it. Stop.

Please follow the WP:SIMPLE rules and properly explain your change with a meanngful edit summary. -- 109.76.133.100 (talk) 09:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Per discussion on your talk page. Removing other sources because there was user aggregated score like Rotten Tomatoes is vandalism and so to maintain the neutrality of the page needs reversion. Well per WP: UGC, the citation provided was for critics review and so I had no reason to remove same cited users reviews. All the best! Otuọcha (talk) 09:42, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

You failed to say this, multiple times. You failed to provide a meaningful edit summary. You need to read the WP:SIMPLE rules again, all editors can benefit from returning to the simple basic principles of this encyclopedia project.

The user scores had to go. WP:UGC

You could have shown good faith by partially restoring the film review, but you failed to do that. The review was from a minor radio station, the critic does not seem to be noteworthy, if you want to restore it the WP:BURDEN would be on you to not just check that it merely had a reference but also that it was a noteworthy critic. You can still do that but do not restore it without checking first.

Do not go around accusing people of vandalism. It makes you look bad. -- 109.76.133.100 (talk) 10:10, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

As this is your talk page you are welcome to remove the whole discussion once you have read. It is misleading to remove only one of my comments.

Having conducted a conversations with other editors on my talk page it is rich to complain about a comment on your talk page actually directed to you.

Now if you've finished bothering me, you can delete this whole thread. -- 109.76.133.100 (talk) 10:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

I see this off WP: CIVILITY. I will say it becoming Casting aspersions from your side or even BURDENING ANOTHER. I didn't accuse you of "just" vandalism. Removing reliable piece as you did in the article claiming it was a small television station is not done anywhere. You only remove the user score aggregate site and leave other sources. Apart from that, I reverted all your edits to maintain neutrality and at the course of manually revering the aggregate decide first to answer all these questions of reversion and per revert to namespace already. Otuọcha (talk) 10:31, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

You commented again so I will respond. You selectively deleted my comments which you should not do, and I strenuously object, per WP:OTHERSCOMMENTS. Commenting on your talk page -- even if you strongly disagree with my comments -- is not vandalism.

You cast the aspersions first by accusing me of vandalism. I reverted a low quality edit with obvious problems and a clear edit summary explaining why. You repeatedly restored it without an edit summary to explain why. Another editor has told you that you were in the wrong. This is being civil, and I have been painfully careful to criticize only your actions and not your person. The WP:BURDEN is on editors who want to restore the material, and the original editor or you could have partially restored the review only if you believed it was good enough. You can still restore that critic if you want.

Per WP:OTHERSCOMMENTS You are welcome to end and delete this whole thread when you're finished. -- 109.76.133.100 (talk) 10:58, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Little Blue Light

Of course it's not vandalism. Novy God is the Russian phrase for "New Year", and also designates the Russian New Year's Eve and New Year's Day celebration. Уж поверь. Я его праздную каждый год. 89.189.156.151 (talk) 12:19, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Much better detailed. I have added it back and once more happy editing. Cheers! Otuọcha (talk) 12:29, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Many thanks! 89.189.156.151 (talk) 12:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Warning about recent change patrolling

Please take more care when patrolling recent changes. After seeing your rollback request, I did a quick survey of some of your recent edits and have serious concerns about your editing. Here is a handful of issues that I found:

• At U. L. Washington, you reverted this well-explained edit as "vandalism", and you re-added an inaccurate statement to the article. I have corrected it just now.
• (as noted in my response to your rollback request) At User talk:2409:4065:CB1:73E2:0:0:624B:DD04, you incorrectly claimed that adding unsourced or poorly cited words are considered vandalism and that Adding unsourced words to articles without citation [...] is clear vandalism, and reacted with hostility to an IP editor trying to explain to you about the erroneous reverts that you made at Tai folk religion, when the editor was just moving existing material around.
• At The Daleks, you characterized this edit as vandalism, when it clearly was not.
• At Great Flood of 1862, you characterized this edit as vandalism, when it clearly was not.
• At Bradley Riches, you characterized this edit as vandalism, when it clearly was not.

If you're not going to listen to the IP editors above, I hope you will listen to an administrator who is telling you to slow down, read Wikipedia:Vandalism carefully and in particular the section about what is not vandalism, and be more careful about how you label others' edits. I see you're using Ultraviolet for patrolling – please pay attention to their warning that you "are expected to have properly studied Wikipedia's policies and guidelines prior to using Ultraviolet and expected to use Ultraviolet within Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or risk being blocked from editing." DanCherek (talk) 20:53, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

@DanCherek Well appreciated. I will be more careful in other edits. Otuọcha (talk) 21:10, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

I replied to you at the AFD

Hi, thank you for participating in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Lozupone, I wanted to tell you that I replied to the question you had looking for good sources showing that he played with those different musical artists, I did find two good sources that confirmed it, and the fact that they have several releases together documented in different places also helps. Someone else replied when I replied to you so I think maybe something was wrong with the notifications. Thank you for your time. ThreeBootsInABucket (talk) 17:09, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Why did you rush over my edit?

I began creating an English page for La Nouvelle Femme and you rushed over my work dumping tons of content. Why? Can't you give some space to the person, who has began working, to complete what they have prepared to do? Tremadog (talk) 17:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Tremadog, I saw your message and was ready to reply. Wikipedia is not an author house, neither do it keep short articles unsourced and uncited. I saved the article while reviewing since I saw it's notability. The article in question wasn't CSD or draftified as the case may be. And since (as stated) in Wikipedia, no man is an author of any article. Pages must be reviewed and edited not by one person at some point. I have helped expand the article and will do that till intake it to GA level. All the best! Otuọcha (talk) 20:30, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

AFDs

Hello, Otuọcha,

Unless you are a returning editor, you are too inexperienced to be closing AFD deletion discussions. Please wait until you have been editing and participating in AFDs for a few more months or a year before you take this on. Please review Wikipedia:Non-admin closure. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:34, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks Liz! All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 03:40, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Ways to improve Julius Abure

Hello, Otuọcha,

Thank you for creating Julius Abure.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Great work! Kindly improve categorisation.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Linus Unah

The article Linus Unah has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG or WP:NJOURNALIST. Current sources are mostly primary and self-published (if not all). I will have to take this to AfD if it is not improved before Deprodding, which is likely going to be deleted after all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:16, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Astrid Preston

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Astrid Preston, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:59, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Suspected As a Sock Puppet

This is a message to let you know that you have been suspected of engaging in sock puppetry, and that there is currently an open SPI case against you, available to view at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Sockpuppet_investigations/Otu%E1%BB%8Dcha

If this is a mistake or error, you have nothing to worry about, and are free to defend yourself from such allegations. 172.58.231.31 (talk) 04:31, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Justin Jin (entrepreneur)

I have never seen notifications suddenly after AFD,m here, do you have any connections? DIVINE 17:46, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @DIVINE Hi there, your message isn’t clear, can you clarify what you mean? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

How many accounts do you operates? Maybe you mistakenly came here DIVINE 18:01, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

@DIVINE You have still not made your message clear. Do not make baseless accusations. It is not the best way to handle situations. I’d advise you to chill out and allow the necessary sysops to handle whatever situation that is on ground with this Otu user. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:33, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

What i can see your history is that you were just joined 7 months ago, i didn’t asked you firstly, secondly you are jumping randomly here and telling me to chill out (Wikipedia is not cafe to chill out) and is questioning me to explain while you don’t have any relationship with the topic. @Drmies is it normal? DIVINE 19:56, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

There's obviously no reason to continue this conversation, taking a look at your own history. I didn't just jump here, I jumped here because I thought your message wasn't clear, I usually watch user/talk pages of potential editor, this Otu user appears to always participate in AfDs and caught my attention to also watch them. I saw when you posted that vague message on their talk page, and decided to stalk in, also, disclosing it with (talk page stalker). With your history, you appear to be one of the many editors who will likely make others quit this project and it's not the best attitude. Try to help promote editors respecting other editors (particularly less experienced ones – make it less difficult for them than it was for you!). Wikipedia needs to retain more potential editors, especially from Africa, and that I will abide to. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:46, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Who’s OTU ? How many talk pages that you have jumped into like mine in last 7 days? See WP:BADGERING while you’re jumping here i will take you into ANI as you’re discussing and jumping into another person talk page while they haven’t responded yet but you’re defending for them. I will see you in ANI while i am traveling now DIVINE 18:07, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Issue regarding "Nomination for deletion" article

Hi, I notice you tagged the "Article for deletion" in the recent article that i created. i try to improving it but suddenly you appeared attacking. Aidillia (talk) 10:07, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Because it doesn't meet some criteria for a stand alone article. You can also see the deletion discussion or my reason for nominating. All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 11:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi, It is regarding AHS Nursing college & Hospital page.

I have solved many issues which has been flagged by you. Kindly check. ThePerfectYellow (talk) 11:19, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 19:25, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Accusations of Vandalism

I have not ever in all the years with over 6000+ edits ever conducted vandalism. Please refrain from this out of order behaviour against me and my long existing Wikipedia history. WikiHuman2021 (talk) 01:07, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

I also was asking what was wrong. If you have stayed here this long, you should know removing CSD tags from articles you created yourself is not allowed. Please stop! All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 01:09, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie

The article Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie and Talk:Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 08:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Need some help for publication

Hello sir/ma'am,

I recently published an article on Prakash Shetty K and you moved it to draft category.. kindly let me know how to proceed with my article as I have around 100 links but in different languages and local media to support my content. Even my content credibility can be checked directly through Google search also. Kindly guide me accordingly. OPPERWEZEN (talk) 08:32, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

My bad. The page has no source. Tha links you provided were YouTube and promotional words. I paraphrased some paragraphs to see it makes sense but to no avail. You might also check out pillars of Wikipedia or how to cite sources which covers ones in different languages. Or you can list them at the reference box in the page. Ping me then, to review them and help out with the page since Wikipedia is not perfection. Once more, welcome to Wikipedia. All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 22:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Bandar Borphukan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bandar Borphukan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie

The article Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie for comments about the article, and Talk:Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 20:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks @Sammi Brie, for bearing and your time in reviewing. All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 23:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lisa Gartner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Links need to de-orphan an article?

Hi. Thanks very much for looking at the article I just created, Interreligious studies, and adding the Orphan tag. I found and made 8 suitable links, thanks to the template. I also created a subheaded section in the Religious studies, article. What's your sense of how much more would need to be done to justify removing that tag? Thanks again, ProfGray (talk) 22:11, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the creation of the article. I have responded to your request and have de-orphaned the article. Regards, All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 22:39, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
37		Staying On (talk)	Add sources
3,301		The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air (talk)	Add sources
36		The Finkler Question (talk)	Add sources
85		The Famished Road (talk)	Add sources
62		Moon Tiger (talk)	Add sources
10		Angoulême International Comics Festival Prize Awarded by the Audience (talk)	Add sources
1,072		The God of Small Things (talk)	Cleanup
29		Gender inequality in Nigeria (talk)	Cleanup
639		Sani Abacha (talk)	Cleanup
18		Guan Yi (talk)	Expand
86		Alan Hollinghurst (talk)	Expand
11		Barry Bloom (talk)	Expand
124		To the Ends of the Earth (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2		John Grange (immunologist) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
228		Will Smith (The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
43		Nameplate (publishing) (talk)	Merge
73		Prussian mythology (talk)	Merge
3		Portnow (talk)	Merge
10		Stewart Cole (talk)	Wikify
23		International Association of National Public Health Institutes (talk)	Wikify
147		Barrowland Ballroom (talk)	Wikify
4		Mkunde Chachage (talk)	Orphan
2		Yossef Av-Gay (talk)	Orphan
6		Luqman Oyebisi Ilaka (talk)	Orphan
56		Heat and Dust (talk)	Stub
11		Petroleum Product Pricing Regulatory Agency (talk)	Stub
68		The Gathering (Enright novel) (talk)	Stub
5		Neil Gow (scientist) (talk)	Stub
2		Siaosi Pōhiva (talk)	Stub
17		The Elected Member (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Elizabeth A. McAlister

I noticed that you tagged Elizabeth A. McAlister 4 minutes after the article was created! 4 minutes is not enough time for an editor to create and develop an article, much less reference it properly. I understand you are not a new page patroller, but the rule of thumb for patrollers is that they should allow at least an hour after a page creator has stopped editing a brand new article before tagging it. I'm sure if you had just created an article, you would not appreciate an editor quickly tagging it while you were still working on it. Bulklana (talk) 20:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Dear @Bulklana and I feel happiest you pointed this out. However, according to WP:TAGGING, "Tags" are often used to indicate problems. Tagging allows editors to specialize, teaches editors and warns readers about subpar or problematic content. I review new pages and tag them for some problems which I may not be able to. That can also be draftifying (which I don't normally do often; even seeing articles that may just in one sentence survive AFD). It isn't bad, but a means of telling the editor to look at that side of the problem also.

Once more, many regards. It's all for the betterment of the Encyclopedia. All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 20:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

While reviewing. It's not always about tagging as seen in WP:OVERTAGGING. This edits [1], [2], [3] were always work of an editor helping a new editor. Also tag me in any case like articles on tags. All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 20:34, 29 March 2024 (UTC)