Jump to content

User talk:Antarcticayu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Samhain23)

Samhain23, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Samhain23! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello. Your recent edit to Castleknock College appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 20:31, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In [this edit] you reverted many changes I made to conform with the manual of style. I'll revert you change for you. Please be more careful in the future. Thanks. Gab4gab (talk) 12:52, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fr John Conmee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://jamesjoyce.ie/on-this-day-13-may/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 20:47, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello. Your recent edit to Castleknock College appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 21:32, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018[edit]

You added "John Conmee SJ, (1847-1910) Jesuit Educator, Character in James Joyce's Novels "A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man" and "Ulysses"" to the list of notable alumni of Castleknock College without providing a reliable source showing he had attended. I reverted your edit. Gab4gab (talk) 17:52, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

John Conmee moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, John Conmee, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:41, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Catherine McEvoy) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Catherine McEvoy, Samhain23!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please work on this in draftsapce.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 19:33, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Castleknock College notable alumni[edit]

I've reverted your addition of a prose partial list of alumni that you added in front of the bullet lists by category. I could understand adding the prose content is the bullet lists were moved to a separate article. Otherwise it's confusing to have two formats, editors then need to debate who to list in prose and who gets left to the bullet lists. In any case I think it's best to propose a change like this on the talk page and reach consensus before implementing. Gab4gab (talk) 11:37, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Gab4gab. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Castleknock College, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 13:35, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Gab4gab. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, John Conmee, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 16:10, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've added the content again without providing a reference in the article although you mention a source in your edit summary. I'll add that for you. This is something you should learn to do for yourself if you're going to continue adding content to articles. Gab4gab (talk) 16:57, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Mount Sackville Secondary School, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whispering(t) 16:21, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Castleknock College. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:26, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Samhain23. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Catherine McEvoy.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89(T·C) 08:24, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mount Sackville Secondary School, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Samhain23. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mount Sackville Secondary School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. kingboyk (talk) 13:30, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]