User talk:JJMC89

This user has opted out of talkbacks

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JJMC89.

Bot-related queries:

About media copyright or non-free media: ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
About category deletions/merges/moves: ask the discussion closer or the admin who listed the implementation instruction at WP:CFD/W.

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

Michelle Sechser[edit]

The copyvio was added back again, for the fourth time, by the same account 2 minutes after you did the revdel, I'm afraid. 2A00:23C5:50E8:EE01:79FB:BC74:BEDF:FF0C (talk) 19:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked and RevDel'd again. Thanks for letting me know. — JJMC89 19:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal of partial block[edit]

~~There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. WizardGamer775 (talk) 23:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]

Hi @JJMC89:, I recently posted to Administrators Noticeboard- Incidents but I think that's the wrong place. I'd like to discuss the partial block imposed upon me.

I understand Wikipedia is a serious project and I am not here to toy around or disrupt the encyclopedia. I am here to contribute in good faith. I want to contribute effectively and help Wikipedia become a stronger source of information.

I ask that you lift this partial block placed on my account. I acknowledge that I have made mistakes with CopyPatrol and will not repeat them again. I am very willing to learn from the mistakes, and go through further material prior to using it again.

I feel that it would have been better if I were warned prior to being blocked. I was not aware that I was using the tool incorrectly. It was never my intention to make incorrect reviews and for that I apologize. WizardGamer775 (talk) 00:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contributing in good faith is not enough. Non-admins working on copyright cleanup need to be trusted by the administrators who volunteer in copyright cleanup in their knowledge and judgment, and the administrators should not feel that they must continually check over their work. Your high error rate and you not taking appropriate cleanup actions, shows that your judgement/knowledge cannot be trusted. Your reviews would need to be continually checked. We don't have time to do that – doing our own reviews of copyright problems is time consuming enough. — JJMC89 17:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am leaving Wikipedia permanently. I thought I'd give it a second chance. A website which punishes those who help in good faith is not a place where I would want to be. WizardGamer775 (talk) 17:50, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @WizardGamer775: I understand your frustration but new editors should definitely not start with copyright cleanup. Because of its legal nature there's little room for error, even when assuming good faith. WP:CIR is especially relevant. If you really want to get into copyright cleanup, review our policies (WP:COPYRIGHT, WP:REVDEL, WP:OVERQUOTE to name a few) thoroughly, maybe do some CCI for a bit, but the most important part is quality over quantity. We are going for speed, not accuracy. Copyright review is extremely tedious and definitely not for everyone. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - _uselesscontributions} 18:18, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While I appreciate your input here, We are going for speed, not accuracy. is the opposite of what we want. — JJMC89 20:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Food and drink in England category talk page[edit]

The Category:Food and drink in England talk page needs fixing as I accidentally moved it trying to move the main category article. Please could you assist as I have tried to fix it but it hasn’t fixed the talk page. ChefBear01 (talk) 10:14, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This looks to already be resolved. — JJMC89 17:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~@JJMC89: Somehow the two talk pages have been minced I need you to delete the Draft Wiki Project Food and drink industry of England talk page, this should hopefully untangle them.~~

I would like to invite you to join the above Draft:WikiProject food and drink industry in England, Many thanks. ChefBear01 (talk) ChefBear01 (talk) 19:11, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't participate in WikiProjects. I encourage you to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink instead of creating a new WikiProject. — JJMC89 20:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CFD bot requests[edit]

Hi JJMC89, please could JJMC89 bot III also process category renamings within the following templates:

The category parameter within {{Stub category}} e.g. [1]
The usercategory parameter within {{userbox}} e.g. [2]

There will always be manual follow up required for some CFDs, but these seem fair requests for a bot to handle. Thanks in advance for you consideration! – Fayenatic London 11:05, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was discussed at Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion/Working/Archive 3#Re-categorizing by updating templates. This would be implementing option 3 from my list. Please open a new discussion to get input from the other regulars before I implement. — JJMC89 20:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Politics/News/Wikinews needs updates[edit]

The page has been stuck on news from 2021 for whatever reason. wikinews:Portal:Politics and conflicts/Wikipedia which the link at the bottom refers to as the source of retrievals is non-existent. That portal on Wikinews has been merged and redirected to wikinews:Category:Politics and conflicts. Latest political news can be retrieved on Wikinews through wikinews:Template:Topic header with parameter the {{Topic header|Politics and conflicts}}. Could this be fixed so the bot updates this Portal:Politics section again? Cheers. –Vipz (talk) 07:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I decided to stop maintaining that task since I would have needed to rewrite Misza13's old Python 2 code to make it work with Python 3 and newer library versions. The declining use made it seem like it wasn't worth my time. FYI, the source page would now be at n:User:Wikinews Importer Bot/Politics and conflicts. — JJMC89 21:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft moved from Mainspace still apply?[edit]

Hi @JJMC89, I hope you're doing well.

Im currently submitting the draft for Hirohara Shrine, a random user by the name user:WC gudang inspirasi made an unauthorized moved the article from Draftspace to Mainspace without the actual anf necessary review process nor the adequate role for it (see: WP:AFCREVIEW.) Thus from here I revert it back to Draftspace. I then notice your bot adding {{drafts moved from mainspace}}. Well indeed it was, but does it still count? even if it was unauthorized? Cheers. Kaliper1 (talk) 07:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The template is just for tracking, so I wouldn't worry about it. You can remove it if you like though. — JJMC89 21:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Football Association and national football teams logos[edit]

I noticed that you remove some of the football association logos from the national football team articles because it does not follow the WP:NFC#UUI#17, can you please explain to me? Guyrichtheman (talk) 11:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

		A beer on me!
		I had started to believe the Denosio/Suomi2023 cases may linger forever without being split. Thank you VERY much for your efforts there; it is incredibly helpful. Ponyo^{bons mots} 15:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates at Wikipedia:Inactive administrators/2024[edit]

I don't know how the page is supposed to work, but I find it suspicious that user Deskana is listed twice:

but all other users are listed once. Could you please clarify if duplication is intentional or not? —⁠andrybak (talk) 22:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I figured it out. The wonder of blink comparison on two separate browser tabs has revealed that two listings are for two different criteria. Listing in May is for "Criterion 1" and in July—for "Criterion 2". The first ("pending") notifications are also separate for each criterion: Special:Diff/1216603573 and Special:Diff/1216603620, though they were sent in the same minute – 00:17, 1 April 2024. —⁠andrybak (talk) 22:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]