User talk:Samira RZ

Hello, Samira RZ, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Samira RZ, good luck, and have fun. – PamD 14:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PamD 14:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cloem[edit]

Hello Samira RZ,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cloem for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. MarkYabloko 13:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Cloem[edit]

Thank you for starting the article Cloem. I think there's just about enough content there which is not promotional for it to survive at this first stage, at least. But please take time to look around and learn how to format Wikipedia articles properly. I've cleaned this one up to use standard headings, but you should have looked at other articles and learned the style. You should also have understood that we don't just throw a list of references at the end of an article: every statement in an article should have a reference to source it to a Reliable Source independent of the company.

Do you have any personal involvement with Cloem? If so, please read WP:COI and take note. If you are an employee, or a close family member of an employee, or similarly closely connected, you should not be editing this article. PamD 14:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Samira RZ, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Samira RZ! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cloem again[edit]

I've noitced your recent edits. You've added a lot of unsourced text, which reads like your personal thoughts about the company and its system. Please remember that Wikipedia cannot include WP:Original Research or "essay-like" content, and that everything must be sourced to Reliable Sources. I've already suggested that you should link the statements in the article to the references which support them. I agree with you that this company and its technique are interesting and probably worthy of an encyclopedia article, but I'm afraid you are not going about writing it in the right way. Please try to explain more clearly to the reader unfamiliar with patent law just what it is which is novel about Cloem, linking this to references where it is explained. And if the "Epistemology" section cannot be sourced to independent published sources it will have to be removed. And so on. You're new to Wikipedia, there's a lot to learn about the bland, factual, sourced, way in which articles have to be written for this international encyclopedia. Good luck. PamD 12:10, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Yeah, I'm actually working on it all day today and trying to fit in the right resources in the right spots and delete a few things and change. I hope it will look better by the end of the day :) It's just so much information and so much to look for ... it makes it all quite difficult - I guess I just need some time and I can make it step by step :) Samira RZ (talk) 12:14, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Cloem has been reverted.
Your edit here to Cloem was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/cloempatent) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:19, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cloem for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cloem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cloem until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edcolins (talk) 18:46, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]