User talk:Samson Dawning

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Samson Dawning, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:24, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Reliable sources[edit]

Please do not use unreliable sources in our encyclopedia articles, per the linked page, as you have done in your edits here, that I have removed. I also believe that you have some connection with the domain that you have been adding to articles here and another WMF wiki. So please read conflict of interest and paid editing and ensure that you are complying with policies if you are choosing to edit. Thanks.— billinghurst sDrewth 21:19, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I don't have a specific affiliation or connection with the domain. I came across their article, and I found it to be intriguing, informative, and suitable for citation. Samson Dawning (talk) 01:54, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Suitable enough to be the only person to have added that domain across wikis, and in several general articles as your first edits? <shrug> Please also see WP:Blog. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You might try adding something on Afghan Walking, with citations from a good source. But you appear to be promoting "fitAnalytica". Rwood128 (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

I would like to express my viewpoint respectfully regarding the citation of an article from FitAnalytica, a website to which I have no affiliation. To illustrate my perspective, I'd like to draw a comparison between two specific articles: one from FitAnalytica, which discusses the dual nature of vegetables in a concise and easily understandable manner for regular readers, and another from a scientific journal titled "Intake Estimation of Phytochemicals in a French Well-Balanced Diet," which may prove challenging for the average reader to comprehend. My primary reason for referencing the FitAnalytica article was to provide a resource that is more accessible to a general audience.

I have immense respect for diligent moderators like yourself who generously contribute to this platform. However, I believe it's important to clarify that mentioning a particular website twice should not automatically imply a promotional intent.

I would kindly request you to reconsider whether there was any malicious intent behind my citation or if my intent was simply to offer a valuable reference. Ultimately, I leave the decision in your capable hands.

PS: If there were any wrongful intentions on my part, I would not have taken the time to provide this response.

[1]https://fitanalytica.com/blogs/nutrition/dual-nature-of-vegetables-nutrients-and-natural-toxins vs Intake Estimation of Phytochemicals in a French Well-Balanced Diet and [2]https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/09637480903213649?scroll=top&needAccess=true Samson Dawning (talk) 18:40, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Samson Dawning, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!