User talk:Samuel Hills

June 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm PBASH607. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Titanic II because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. PrabashWhat? 15:44, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of recurring The Simpsons characters. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of recurring The Simpsons characters was changed by Samuel Hills (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880125 on 2013-06-08T15:44:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:45, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Titanic II with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 15:48, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please, I was silly with the simpsons I have to admit. But what I posted on titanic II was true.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of recurring The Simpsons characters, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. PrabashWhat? 15:54, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I stopped though....anyway I wont do it again. If I get blocked how long will it be for?

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Albert Brothers, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. We are monitoring your edits, and any further vandalism will be reverted.MatthewHaywood (talk) 16:12, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

facepalm* It took you a while to notice that....

You have been blocked infinetly from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:

{{unblock|reason=I should be unblocked because even though I was being naughty. I stopped and then went on to make a normal article that was true. Please give me one last chance as I understand I have done wrong. ~~~~}}

. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Spencer^T♦C 16:30, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OMG! I stopped ok!! Please unblock me! There was no need for this at all!

Proposed deletion of Abdulrahman Al-Shoaibi[edit]

Hello, Samuel Hills. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Abdulrahman Al-Shoaibi, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Abdulrahman Al-Shoaibi to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, TKK ^{bark !} 23:38, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]