User talk:Sandman arabone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Sandman arabone, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Fayenatic London 08:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:46, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Sandman arabone, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:46, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Orpheus[edit]

The sources you cited do not meet WP:Identifying reliable sources. In some cases, you simply cited other Wikipedia articles, which not allowed per WP:REFLOOP. The blog you cited falls under WP:USERG.

There's also the problem of undue weight and original research. You really need secondary or tertiary sources to establish that those theories are given any widespread attention. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:28, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you've been making the same sort of edits to other articles. Always cite a professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic source for any new information. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:32, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Churrio Jabal has been accepted[edit]

Churrio Jabal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Joseph2302 21:39, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]