User talk:Sanfranfanad

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A belated welcome![edit]

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Sanfranfanad. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! —Bagumba (talk) 00:28, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Smith[edit]

the edit you made was not really good - USA Today All Joe Team - and your references did not reveal, I reverted it, you could try discussion on the talkpage Govindaharihari (talk) 08:45, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to James Harden, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 08:53, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at James Harden shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DaHuzyBru (talk) 18:22, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sanfranfanad. You have new messages at DaHuzyBru's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.