User talk:SapphireGaze

Ways to improve Vcha[edit]

Hello, SapphireGaze,

Thank you for creating Vcha.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Kpopping is not a reliable source per WP:KO/RS#UR please do not use it.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lightoil}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lightoil (talk) 07:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:VCHA Members (2023).jpeg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VCHA Members (2023).jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kim Garam (October 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paper9oll was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

the subject currently does not meets the WP:GNG, WP:NBLP, WP:SINGER, and WP:BANDMEMBER criteria showing lack of significant coverage for individual notability from secondary reliable sources that is independent of the subject apart from passing mentions from Le Sserafim's related reportings.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kim Garam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SapphireGaze! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about RCTA[edit]

Hello, SapphireGaze

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Rusalkii and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect RCTA, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 23 § RCTA.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rusalkii}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Rusalkii (talk) 22:59, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Race Change To Another" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Race Change To Another has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 24 § Race Change To Another until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:RCTA[edit]

Hello, SapphireGaze. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:RCTA, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]