User talk:Savesh.pather

Welcome!

Hello, Savesh.pather, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Michael Pillay, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! AndrewWTaylor (talk) 10:19, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michael Pillay[edit]

The article Michael Pillay has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

unsourced WP:BLP

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 10:19, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Savesh. For a start, it appears you have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest which you need to be careful about. Is Pather Media a notable company? If not, and if you have a close connection with it, then you are using wikipedia to promote it, and this is not allowed. Deb (talk) 17:42, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nesan Pather[edit]

The article Nesan Pather has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable - nearly all the references are blogs or uncredible sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Evaders99 (talk) 08:18, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Stars are my Guide[edit]

The article The Stars are my Guide has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOOK.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 14:52, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michael Pillay[edit]

The article Michael Pillay has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable third-party sources or valid claim to notability. Book fails WP:NBOOK.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 14:52, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Melvin Pather[edit]

The article Melvin Pather has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable artist. Fails WP:CREATIVE.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 14:54, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nesan Pather for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nesan Pather is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nesan Pather until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 14:57, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Pillay for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Pillay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Pillay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 22:50, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Melvin Pather for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Melvin Pather is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melvin Pather until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 22:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Stars are my Guide for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Stars are my Guide is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Stars are my Guide until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 22:52, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia policy note[edit]

Noting the similarity between your account name and the names of the people on whom you have been contributing articles, I'm drawing your attention to the Wikipedia policy on editing with potential conflict of interest. AllyD (talk) 09:58, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]