User talk:Scientistssupporter

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Scientistssupporter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Tadahiko Mizuno, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! E Wing (talk) 06:28, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tadahiko Mizuno[edit]

The article Tadahiko Mizuno has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. E Wing (talk) 06:28, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, E Wing Thank you for bring this matter regarding reference to my attention. I have added proper references to support the contents of the page. I trust you will find everything is in order. I would greatly appreciate if you could remove the proposed deletion. Thank you! Scientistssupporter (talk) 21:56, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Scientistssupporter, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi Scientistssupporter! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm DAJF. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Tadahiko Mizuno without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --DAJF (talk) 09:32, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tadahiko Mizuno, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 23:47, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments. I changed the Infobox template in Tadahiko Mizuno to Infobox scientist template and moved all the contents in the Infobox template to the new Infobox scientis template which was more suitable for the contents. I appreciate your comment and advice. Thank you. 174.7.71.171 (talk) 23:55, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There was no problem with the infobox you used. The problem was with your unexplained removal of the image caption. As I mentioned in my earlier edit summary, please also be careful about marking such edits as "Minor" when that is clearly not the case. Thanks. --DAJF (talk) 00:32, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Minoru Toyoda Gold Medal.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Minoru Toyoda Gold Medal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:03, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Giuliano Preparata Medal.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Giuliano Preparata Medal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:04, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Linking[edit]

Hi, thanks for your work. Just a reminder that on the English WP we don't normally link years, dates, or common terms. Thanks. Tony (talk) 12:20, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking[edit]

Hi, and thanks for your contributions. Please remember that on en.WP we don't normally link years, dates, or common terms. Cheers. Tony (talk) 13:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013[edit]

Hello, Scientistssupporter. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article The International Society for Condensed Matter Nuclear Science, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:11, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The International Society for Condensed Matter Nuclear Science for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The International Society for Condensed Matter Nuclear Science is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The International Society for Condensed Matter Nuclear Science until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. a13ean (talk) 15:09, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The International Society for Condensed Matter Nuclear Science Prizes for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The International Society for Condensed Matter Nuclear Science Prizes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The International Society for Condensed Matter Nuclear Science Prizes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alexbrn ^{talk|contribs|COI} 05:17, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Giuliano Preparata Medals for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giuliano Preparata Medals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giuliano Preparata Medals until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alexbrn ^{talk|contribs|COI} 05:22, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]