User talk:Scrotal3838

This account, Scrotal3838, has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because your username does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

Please choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. However, do not create a new account if you wish to credit your existing contributions to a new name through a username change. To request a username change:

Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to edit this talk page even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a list of names that have already been taken. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Jayron32 22:04, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

reuqest[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scrotal3838 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Why have I been blocked? What's wrong with this name? Scrotal is a word that decent upstanding people use everyday. It's more of a medical term. It isn't slang or vulgar. I could understand blocking 'nutsack' or 'bollock', I guess. See also "Isn't the sea what Algy calls it: a grey sweet mother? The snotgreen sea. The scrotum-tightening sea. Epi oinopa ponton." Joyce, "Ulysses"

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 22:39, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

i don't know what's happening[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scrotal3838 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the message up there says the username is the only reason for the block, and it says I can appeal the block, so I did, but it was turned down. So now I tried to create a new user but it said I couldn't because "abusing multiple accounts". But the message up there tells me to create another account, which I guess I have to if you won't let me use scrotal (which is not an offensive word). So, what do I do now, I can't use this name, and you won't let me create another account because that's abusing multiple accounts. I'll give up this account, I just want to create a new account. AND HOW DO I TALK TO PEOPLE? The message says using this template too often will lead to my wiki page being protected. Scrotal3838 (talk) 22:57, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblock request already reviewed: "Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon" ^Chillum 23:34, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To explain a bit more, Jpgordon is a checkuser, who can look at the IP addresses you are using and determine what other accounts are using the same IP address you are, as well as other technical information that can point to your identity. Based on his analysis, you have been abusing multiple accounts prior to this one. He would not have made such a statement had you been following the rules, or if you had just created a new account because of the good-faith mistake in this username. That would not be abuse. Whatever it is you have done with your prior accounts, you should not be making new accounts to avoid scrutiny. --Jayron32 00:36, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]