User talk:Scryer 360

Insert your comments, which I will likely dismiss, here.

June 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Paul Revere, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. A520 | Talk me away!/sign it! 15:04, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My reverting the article to the June 3rd version was an agreed upon edit on the Paul Revere talk page by multiple confirmed wikipedia editors. You do not have the sole right to control editing of a page, especially the agreed upon edits. Scryer_360 (talk) 15:23, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scryer, I see that you have been reverted again. Why not give it another 48 hours to see if your consensus holds? It probably will, but Jokestress is right that you can't make a decision based on a thread that is only open for a few hours Purpleback pack 89≈≈≈≈ 15:27, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

48 hours will do then. I just shudder to think that with the article as jacked up as it is now, people will see it. Reviewing the history of the article, it seems that very few people were concerned with the quality of the article and that most edits were minor. Heck I think most were just grammar. Then *boom*, someone famous says something and suddenly we add politics with users who don't often come here and on and on, and now we're screwed and looking at an article that itself needs lots of combing to be sure its neutral. Scryer_360 (talk) 15:35, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Kim Bruning. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. E♴(talk) 16:51, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Kim Bruning. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wikipelli ^Talk 17:07, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So then block me. She gets to give me shit like that in the discussion page on Paul Revere and you guys come in here threatening me? The hell is this? Scryer_360 (talk) 17:23, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Kim Bruning. Wikipelli ^Talk 17:31, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 20 hours for Personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —GFOLEY FOUR— 22:00, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apology/ wikistress[edit]

I noticed you were having some wikistress, so I linked to two friendly and somewhat humorous project-space pages which I always go to when I'm dealing with my own wikistress. You looked like you could use it.

Well, that backfired brilliantly. :-(

My apologies. I hadn't realized you were quite that stressed, else I would have been more circumspect.

--Kim Bruning (talk) 21:47, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]