User talk:Sean gorter/Signature shop/Danielfolsom
Danielfolsom[edit]
Hey Mr. Gorter, so as you can probably tell from my current signature (with regards ot both its lack of quality and the "Can you help me..." link at the end), I've been looking for a nice sig. for some time now, and while I have gotten a few responses (see link at the end), I have yet to be truly happy with any of them. Would you mind helping me out here? Really appreciate it, Daniel()Folsom |\T/|\C/|\U/|(Can you help me with my signature?) 18:56, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- Here, if this satisfies you:
- It's less than 250 characters, I mean the signature, so it doesn't violate the rules of WP:SIG. †Sean gorter† 08:14, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, and sorry, does your computer have Microsoft Word 2003 or up? †Sean gorter† 08:16, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- No it doesn't - is that why the sig looks a bit off?danielfolsom © 18:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Don't worry about the new sig - I combined some of the other options I previously mentioned - and while it's kind of dissapointing cause I really like this one - It's too many characters (although I did reduce it from 700 to 283 ...danielfolsom © 19:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- And I might do that with yours to - just tweak it a bit ... hope that's ok...— Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielfolsom (talk • contribs)
- Don't worry about the new sig - I combined some of the other options I previously mentioned - and while it's kind of dissapointing cause I really like this one - It's too many characters (although I did reduce it from 700 to 283 ...danielfolsom © 19:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- No it doesn't - is that why the sig looks a bit off?danielfolsom © 18:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, and sorry, does your computer have Microsoft Word 2003 or up? †Sean gorter† 08:16, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Try to tweak your signature...
Does that satisfy you? †Sean gorter† 10:18, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Or this:
- ...since a talk page can be accessed via a userpage. †Sean gorter† 10:23, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oh that's also very nice - I like your idea about the two links instead of three, so now I've narrowed it down.
I'm either going with this:
danielfolsom ©
Or This
danielfolsom ©
The first is 250 - the second 181— Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielfolsom (talk • contribs)
- Oh that's also very nice - I like your idea about the two links instead of three, so now I've narrowed it down.
- Tweaked the second's signature code and added the contributions code. †Sean gorter† 10:04, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Nice.danielfolsom© 12:01, 13 April 2007 (UTC)