User talk:Sedgehead

Howdy! I'm new at this but having fun! Feel free to leave me a message!

I'm an editor, writer, botanist, and ecologist who's teaching himself Chinese, so I may end up editing almost anything on Wikipedia. I stay busy, so feel free to rattle my cage if you need my attention!

Background[edit]

I'm a botanist and ecologist, retired from the U. S. Forest Service, who has an interest in the genus Carex (Cyperaceae).

Why Chinese?[edit]

I heard a National Public Radio program in 2002 discussing global languages and learned that two people speak Chinese for every one who speaks English. I started learning Chinese in early 2004 and now chat in Chinese with people in China every day.

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Sedgehead. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! SmartSE (talk) 21:10, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

Hi Sedgehead - I'm a real person (not a computer) and a he. Thanks for your note - out of hundreds of people I've welcomed I think you're the first to reply! If you find the time, I am sure there is plenty of useful work that you could do around here - for starters Carex could do with expanding. Regarding Chinese geography - this may well be because there are few English sources in existence that discuss the areas, meaning that few wikipedia editors can access them. Unfortunately that is the case for many topics outside of the West and there is little we can do about it. Anyway, if you ever want to contribute more, drop me a note and I can give you some tips as to how to make editing easier. Thanks SmartSE (talk) 22:02, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In answer to your question "what makes a good reference?" our page on identifying reliable sources should help - basically we should reference books by large publishers, scientific papers, govt reports and reputable newspapers. For Xin River you should look at google books and possibly google scholar (although accessing these sources may not be easy. I also noticed that Brittanica have an article on the Xin so you can use that as a reference too. You can't cite other wikipedia articles due to the problem of circular referencing and unfortunately the English wikipedia has tougher controls on references than some other languages so even if something is referenced in the Chinese version, you may not be able to use it here. Finally, you answered your own question correctly - as a tertiary source, we can only use information that has already been published - this is covered by our no original research policy. Let me know if you have any other questions and good luck with your first article. (If it gets to more than 1500 characters long, it can appear on the main page in the did you know? section.) SmartSE (talk) 16:49, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed the problem in your draft - it was because some references ended with </rev> rather than </ref>. It would be good if you can move the references to being inline citations so that readers can know which source contains the information for each reference. Hopefully that link makes it clear how to do it, but if not drop me a note again. Oh and about the previous question: you need to click on the [edit] button on the RHS of the screen at the top of the first message, and then use colons to offset the new comment from the old ones. SmartSE (talk) 11:44, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think I see how to do this. Thanks for the fix! I knew it was possible to create inline citations, I just didn't know how! So, your suggestions are very helpful. I'll work on that as I take the time. As wikipedia says in their guidelines, "Don't get in a hurry, Rome (and wikipedia) was not built in a day!" I'm using this article for several purposes. First, I'm a full time writer and editor; I was reviewing a research paper from China on the Xin River and needed the info! I improve Chinglish to English (more info on my personal sedgehead website). Second, it give me a chance to learn about how to edit here. Third, my Chinese friends are shocked I wrote a page on wikipedia about a river in their home province they didn't even know existed! Now they want to learn how to edit wikipedia. "I use it all the time," one of them said! So, we should have more fun. I'll keep researching this area for more info to add to the Xin River page. My Chinese friends want to find someone in the area to take some photos for us. I'm not sure what form of permission I need from them, but I'll find out! Then we can add photos to this page.

I'm wondering how to cite a single source several times. I moved the references into the text for the Xin River after visiting the library today. There are still only five books cited, but the list of references shows about 14. Any thoughts anyone? Sedgehead (talk) 15:59, 22 October 2011 (UTC)Sedgehead[reply]

I've done it for the brittanica reference, but it might not be clear what I did from the diff... It is explained at Wikipedia:REF#Repeated_citations though which hopefully makes sense. Let me know if it doesn't. SmartSE (talk) 11:04, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It took me a few minutes to get all the patterns down right! But I did it! The basics are done with this page. I am trying to find someone in China to send me some photos to add. I found Wikipedia's photo permission statement, so I imagine I just need to get the person who takes the photo to send me a note of permission to use it. I'm not sure who send it to (the permission statement needed by wikipedia). When I have a chance, I'll look up more info on the Xin River at the U of A, 126 west of my home. This has been a good learning page for me to learn the wikipedia system. I'm also going to try to find on line info in Chinese about the Xin River. I know the standards are high for using such on wikipedia, but I'll read them again before I upload new info from the web. Any suggestion are always welcome. Thanks for the assistance with the refs. I even remembered to sign this! Sedgehead (talk) 15:59, 22 October 2011 (UTC)Sedgehead[reply]

Nice work! I'm a bit busy at the moment, but I'll keep an eye on things and let me know if you have any more questions. SmartSE (talk) 09:30, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of International Association of Bryologists[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on International Association of Bryologists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bazj (talk) 19:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of International Association of Bryologists[edit]

The article International Association of Bryologists has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:04, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not loosing any sleep over this deletion or non-deletion. I do know the IAB folks are actively working today (March 2) to improve the article. I've been in communication with several of them and discussed a few ideas about what needs to be done. I wish them luck! Sedgehead (talk) 23:24, 2 March 2012 (UTC)Sedgehead[reply]

A few more thoughts. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bryology. It is pretty sparse. Compare it to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology. We could create a talk page for the IAP page. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_page. Or you are welcome to use my existing talk page for the discussion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sedgehead (The IAB page discussion is at the bottom of my current talk page). Talk pages are easy to use, but like all of wikipedia it takes a little thought investment to get started. The advantage is having a place for volunteer wikipedia editors to talk. I will post this note on my talk page. Let me know if I can help. Forward this and other messages at will! Sedgehead (talk) 21:49, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Sedgehead[reply]

Regarding IAB[edit]

Hi Sedgehead, I just answered your question at my talk page: User talk:First Light. I moved the discussion from where you put it, which was my User Page—I've made the same mistake, posting a note on someone's user page. You'll see that some editors like to keep a discussion thread all in one place, including myself, so I answered there. And welcome to Wikipedia! First Light (talk) 22:03, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Xilin River, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Succession (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:42, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Sedgehead. You have new messages at Smartse's talk page.
Message added 20:27, 28 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

SmartSE (talk) 20:27, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of rivers of China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Xin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Larix olgensis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

species occurs in Central [[Sikhote-Alin]], and rarely occurs in [[North Korea]], and [[Jilin]]] and and eastern [[Heilongjiang]] provinces of [[China]], between 500 and 1100 metres in elevation.<

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:43, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sanjiang Plain may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

] (also known as the Heilong, or literally, "Black Dragon" or River), [[Songhua]] and [[Ussuri]] [also known as the Wusuli) rivers and covers 23 counties in [[Heilongjiang]] Province, [[China]] encompassing about 109,000

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:54, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Index Herbariorum[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Index Herbariorum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 115ash^→(☏) 16:00, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

advice[edit]

No, as the reviewing administrator I could see it had context enough to know what it was, and so was not speedy deleted. However the article needs additional references, providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements. It is undoubtedly included in various guides to the botanical literature, and these will be very good references. Please be extremely careful not to quote or closely paraphrase form its website, or the NYBG.I did some additions, but the date of each edition and the name of each editor should be added. DGG ( talk ) 17:48, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Index Herbariorum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Specimens. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Burns & Trauma[edit]

The article Burns & Trauma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 01:04, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have also proposed this article for speedy deletion (G4) as a recreation of an article previously deleted after a deletion discussion. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 01:14, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I certainly understand. The folks who prepared the original page asked me to help them with it. I did not understand exactly how it works (independent sources vs the sources created by the journal itself. Feel free to delete page if needed. I'll try to get it copied and not post it again until I find some independent sources. Sedgehead (talk) 05:42, 21 December 2014 (UTC)Sedgehead[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Sedgehead. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Sedgehead. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Sedgehead. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]