User talk:Seeker4264
|
Speedy deletion nomination of AV News[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on AV News requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Travelbird (talk) 06:17, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of AV News[edit]
A tag has been placed on AV News, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Theopolisme TALK 17:52, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
April 2012[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:07, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Seeker4264 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What the flying f***??? Please list what I posted that constitutes a personal attack or harassment???? I simply point out that the page I am trying to create, AV News, is about a news publication in the Antelope Valley region of California and is JUST AS NOTABLE as the wiki page about the Antelope Valley Press and then asked Bwilkins to quit being so heavy-handed and explain why AV Press is acceptable while AV News is not when the pages are formatted exactly the same and the only difference is one paper has been around longer than the other and I get slapped with a block and a bogus claim of attack? You need to get some thicker-skinned people running this show for one and either delete the Antelope Valley Press page too or restore AV News and give me some time to add to the page or at the very least some idea of WHAT THE F*** else you'd like to see on the page before you'll allow me to post it!!!!!!!!!!!
Decline reason:
I think the unblock request and below conversation more or less explains. Block extended to one week. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 12:08, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Seeker4264 (talk) 11:18, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- You might want to rethink how you phrase this: it does not take a lot of work to see your contributions - your abusive post on my talkpage is a clear personal attack. While blocked, I encourage you to actually READ the blue-links I provided you in all of my replies to you on my talkpage. They are links to the relevant policies on Wikipedia that will hopefully help you to understand - that is, after all, why I provided them (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:21, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Hey Bwilkins, it is clear you have some kind of hard on about me, why don't you shut up and come suck my **** already and let someone who isn't bought and paid for by the AV Press handle this issue? Better yet read WP:GFY
Seeker4264 (talk) 11:29, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Seeker4264 (talk) 11:29, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Comment from uninvolved editor: Seeker4264, you have to stop making personal attacks NOW, and retract the attacks you have made, or else I predict that you might be blocked for a longer period of time and that you will lose the right to edit even this talk page. --bonadea contributions talk 11:36, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
No. Go ahead and delete my account if you want, but Bwilkins is a f***ing Nazi and I have better things to do than waste any more time on a site that allows s*** like him/her to be d***s.
Seeker4264 (talk) 11:45, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- Because they gave you clear and specific answers to your various points, and backed them up with links to Wikipedia policy, repeated their advice when you were uncivil, but didn't agree with you? Your use of the English language is different from mine. --bonadea contributions talk 11:59, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Feel better yet?[edit]
Thankfully, I have pretty thick skin. As you clearly have yet to read a single word of policy yet surrounding either article, let me help a little here - I'll put the links that I have already provided to you all right here in one place. Here's a hint - click the blue link that starts with "WP":
- WP:NOTDIRECTORY - Wikipedia is not a business directory
- WP:GNG We are an encyclopedia of notable topics
- WP:RS All claims must be supported by third party reliable sources not belonging to the subject
- WP:V We must be able to verify all claims/information
- WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS The other article might not belong either, but that's an argument to avoid
- WP:COI Conflict of interest should be avoided, although you have addressed that
- WP:PROMO Don't promote an entity - again, you appear to have addressed that
- WP:NPA Our policy against personal attacks
- WP:CORP The notability guidelines for companies (from the WP:REFUND request)
- WP:CSD#G11 Speedy deletion information for promotion (also from REFUND)
- WP:CSD#A7 Speedy deletion information when no credible assertion of significance has been provided
We "Nazis" rarely try to provide so much assistance to any editor. One can lead a horse to water, but apparently we cannot make them drink. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:07, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Bwilkins, shut the f*** up, I'm done talking with your sorry a**.
Want notability? Will this do A**hole?
http://www.onlinenewspapers.com/usstate/uscalifo.htm
http://www.antelopevalleyhaunts.com/avhauntsmeetsavnews.htm
http://www.avhidesert.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=1710
Well, what's the next BS reason you're going to toss at me Adolph Hitler (aka Bwilkins)????
- Are you for real? You're comparing somebody not letting you have an article on a website to the genocide of millions of innocent people? And you think that's ok? Well it's not, it's despicable, and I seriously suggest you think about what you're actually saying and act like an adult--Jac16888 Talk 16:59, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Hey Jac16888, how very chickenshit of you to take a shot at someone who has been blocked from responding for a week. Feel better about yourself down there in mom's basement you pop-tart sucking shitbag?
As for the notability BS, I note that 3 of the 4 links on the ANtelope Valley Press page that you claim show notability don't go to anything and the fourth is a link to a yearbook mugshot. Such high standards you fuckers have.
As for the AV News page, I e-mailed them about your BS actions, Adolph Bwilkens Hitler, and they asked me to discontinue my efforts on their behalf. Seems they think not being on Wiki is preferred. So basically to all the Nazi mods here:
GO FUCK YOURSELVES!!!!!!
Seeker4264 (talk) 20:38, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- Wow, you must be a real scumbag. Don't be surprised if one day somebody who actually knows what calling someone a Nazi means take offence and beats the crap out of you, although I'm sure you don't have the guts to go around saying things like that in person. I wonder if these AV folks would be so nice to you if they knew about your behaviour here? Oh and its "Adolf" genius--Jac16888 Talk 11:09, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
May 2012[edit]
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:Bwilkins, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Zhou Yu (talk) 06:51, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 06:53, 7 May 2012 (UTC)