User talk:Segaton

Hello, Segaton, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 00:15, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Walrus Ji. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bhagyalakshmi temple, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Segaton, Times of India is not considered a reliable source. specially not for Historical claims. Please discuss on the talk page. Walrus Ji (talk) 08:15, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bhagyalakshmi temple; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Walrus Ji (talk) 08:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Citations are required for claims such as on Turtle[edit]

Hi, the basic principle of Wikipedia is that facts are verifiable (WP:V), which means they are cited (WP:CITE) to reliable sources (WP:RS).

You MUST NOT add things that you personally believe or "know" to be true, as nobody else has access to that source of information, it is totally unverifiable.

In the case of this article, the cited source give one name for the deity. To add a different name, a further RELIABLE source would be required. I do hope this is clear: it is a general principle. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:34, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Need more in-depth articles discussing the web-series before mainspace.[edit]

An article you recently created, Halala (Web series), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 06:34, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have left a detailed message on your talk page. Segaton (talk) 09:35, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Halala (Web series) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Halala (Web series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halala (Web series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 10:30, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

@Serols: slow down with Huggle. My edit was perfectly valid. Segaton (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The restore was wrong, look for a fewer version ('Racism and racial -> 'Ethnic relations) , sorry for the warning. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:55, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion[edit]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Far-right politics in Ukraine".

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

~Asarlaí 21:14, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion[edit]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a case in which you are a party being opened for discussion. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Far-right politics in Ukraine".

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

--A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 10:10, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Renat 13:19, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re[edit]

Compare to [1]. My very best wishes (talk) 20:08, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Far-right in Ukraine[edit]

Hello Segaton, with regard to this edit of yours do you still remember which document were you referring to with "document titled under 'Conclusion'" in your edit summary? I'm trying to find the reference. Thank you if you can help! Gitz (talk) (contribs) 10:07, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gitz6666: Jump to p. 28 here for "conclusion". Segaton (talk) 17:39, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Claire Byrne Live[edit]

I don't know how to email someone on wiki, I expected that the article would go live and that others (in the community) would add to the article, no reason really for it to be in a draft format IMHO. IrishTV (talk) 12:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas![edit]

MBlaze Lightning (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

MBlaze Lightning (talk) 08:57, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Philip Seymour Hoffman has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Philip Seymour Hoffman has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 13:21, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]