User talk:Sensris

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Sensris! Welcome to Wikipedia! You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! SkyWarrior 00:30, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

June 2022[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nayanthara have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nayanthara was changed by Sensris (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.910395 on 2022-06-09T15:34:34+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:34, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sensris! Your additions to Vijayakanth have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 04:13, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Theoder2055. I noticed that you removed content from Pa. Ranjith without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Theoder2055 (talk) 18:17, 9 June 2022

Please do not remove or blank out portions of page content as you did at Arun Vijay. Your content removal doesn’t appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Thank you. Theoder2055 (talk) 04:08, 1 July 2022 (UTC).[reply]

July 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Geniac. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Akshara Gowda, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 05:42, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kuruthi Aattam, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 15:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at K. R. Vijaya, you may be blocked from editing. Geniac (talk) 13:13, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove portions of page content as you did at D Block (film). Theoder2055 (talk) 07:57, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Vijayakanth has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your third warning. — Diannaa (talk) 18:28, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia as you did at Ponniyin Selvan: I. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Theoder2055 (talk) 05:47, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mirnalini Ravi. Geniac (talk) 04:45, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Arun Vijay has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. The paragraph you added was obviously copied from the source. You cannot do that on Wikipedia. You must completely rewrite and summarize, in your own words, information from the sources. Ravensfire (talk) 22:02, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chandini Tamilarasan. Ravensfire (talk) 15:14, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Geniac (talk) 03:36, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chandini Tamilarasan. You've been blocked for this before - stop adding unsourced information to articles. Further examples will be taken to WP:AIV. Ravensfire (talk) 16:44, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Theoder2055. I noticed that you removed content from Pradeep Ranganathan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Theoder2055 (talk) 20:40, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Ravensfire (talk) 18:34, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

Your edit to P. Sai Kumar has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 22:09, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kovai Sarala, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 23:52, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gautami, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dharma Durai. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Raai Laxmi, you may be blocked from editing. Archer1234 (t·c) 15:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As a follow up, I have been reviewing your edits on March 7, 2023, and many add claims without citing any published reliable source(s) or are not supported by the sources that are cited. You need to stop doing edits like that. You have been previously blocked for this. If you continue, you may find you will be blocked again, perhaps indefinitely. I am going through each one on that date and reverting or correcting ones that have sourcing or other defects. If you self-revert your own edits, that would be a good sign that you see and understand the problems with them and will work to correct them. Please be careful with your future editing. If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page or you can ask at The Teahouse. — Archer1234 (t·c) 16:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Suman (actor). Archer1234 (t·c) 17:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Suman (actor). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Archer1234 (t·c) 15:25, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to Suman (actor) have added claims without citing published reliable source(s) or that use unreliable sources. For example, this edit and this edit both use nettv4u.com, which is on the list of unreliable sources at WP:ICTFSOURCES. Similarly, this edit uses filmibeat.com, which is also on that same list of unreliable sources.

I am going to remove those citations and the claims to which they are attached (or tag them with {{citation needed}} templates. If you want to discuss this further, I am open to continuing the discussion here, at Talk:Suman (actor) or at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force. However, if you reinstate them or continue to use these and other unreliable sources (especially those identified as unreliable at WP:RSP and at WP:ICTFSOURCES) at Suman or other articles, then I will report your editing behavior to administrators for review and assessment. — Archer1234 (t·c) 15:43, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

then i add content on suman actor citing reliable sources? THANKS Sensris (talk) 20:34, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Citing reliable sources is required, although there are many other policies, guidelines and standards that must be followed including WP:NPOV, WP:WEIGHT, WP:NOTCATALOG, and many others. — Archer1234 (t·c) 21:00, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added content in the Suman actor page. thanks Sensris (talk) 22:52, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Much better, but two issues:

You are adding bare URLs. That is not good. Read #What is wrong with bare URLs? to learn why. You need to add full citations. Please read, study, and follow the guidance in WP:Citing sources to learn how to add full citations.
The last source you added at Suman (actor) (ghgossip.com) is not reliable. Gossip and tabloid sources are not reliable (see WP:BLPGOSSIP. Please read, study and follow the guidance in Wikipedia:Reliable sources and WP:BLPSOURCES.

Biographies of living persons are given extra scrutiny. The lead section at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons is a good summary of why this is so. You should read it and take care to keep it in mind when you are asserting claims in biographies.

I hope this helps. If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page or you can ask at The Teahouse where experienced editors can offer you advice and guidance. Happy Editing. — Archer1234 (t·c) 23:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sensris. Thank you for providing the requested citation in P. Sai Kumar. However, you continue to add citations as bare URLs and this is not good. Would you explain why you are not filling out the full citation? — Archer1234 (t·c) 22:14, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Archer1234. I noticed that you recently removed content from Varalaxmi Sarathkumar without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Archer1234 (t·c) 22:56, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Ashok Kumar (Tamil actor) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Archer1234 (t·c) 20:10, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Suman (actor), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. — Archer1234 (t·c) 20:48, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Suman (actor), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Don't remove citation tags unless you actually provided the citation. Ravensfire (talk) 22:57, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kalairani[edit]

Hi @Sensris. I noticed this recent edit to Kalairani where the edit that filled out a reference was reverted, but there was no explanation given in the edit summary. The original edit should have been uncontroversial, but perhaps I made a mistake or missed some defect that you found. Would you clarify? Thank. — Archer1234 (t·c) 21:31, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

J. Livingston[edit]

Hi @Sensris. This edit to J._Livingston with the explanation "Archer1234 why you search problemes, Archer1234 you don' t see, i put a new movie Kannitheevu why delete" confuses me. Would you explain further which parts of the edit you reverted were incorrect or went against Wikipedia policies or guidelines? Thanks. — Archer1234 (t·c) 22:11, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aadukalam Naren[edit]

@Sensris, the reason you gave, "you don' t see, i put a new movie Kannitheevu why delete" for this edit to Aadukalam Naren does not justify reverting six policy-based and guideline-based edits. If the explanation did not make sense to you or was too opaque or you felt it did not apply or that I made a mistake, then you should have started a discussion on my talk page or at Talk:Aadukalam Naren asking for clarification. Do not communicate to another editor through the edit summary.

In this case, I did see that you added a new movie Kannitheevu. I removed it for the reason given in the edit summary of this edit:

→‎Tamil films: remove unsourced and unlinked 2023 works. Per WP:FILMOGRAPHY: Do not add future projects until filming has begun as verified by a reliable source.

In other words, you did not cite published reliable source(s) to verify that Aadukalam Naren is in Kannitheevu. I also removed other 2023 films that did not have citations.

Verifiability

Verifiability is one of the core content policies of Wikipedia. It reads, in part:

All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports^[a] the contribution.^[b]

It goes on to say: "any problems with the text or sourcing should be fixed before the material is added back".

How to deal with contentious issues

Sensris, you are a fairly new editor on English Wikipedia (9 months, ~1500 edits). I understand it is hard for new editors to know all the relevant policies and guidelines, so it can be very frustrating when an edit gets reverted, or your contributions removed. I get it. I was there once myself. I found it very frustrating, and I was tempted to lash out or to edit-war with other editors. But that would not have been a positive and helpful response and it risked my being blocked from editing. So, I am assuming good faithe that you responded the way you did out without adequate understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and without understanding how best to respond to a situation like this.

Wikipedia always needs new editors and so your contributions are valued. My advice to you is that when you do not understand why something has happened or think that someone has made a mistake, communicate with the other editor(s) involved or ask for advice at The Teahouse. I have vound that having patience is important when interacting with other editors over contentious matters.

Concluding point

Unless you want to discuss the particular change you wanted to make to Aadukalam Naren, I ask that you self-revert your edit to restore it back to the previous version. If you have found a published reliable source to verify that Aadukalam Naren is in Kannitheevu, then self-revert first, and then, in a separate edit, add in your source. This would be a good-faith sign on your part that you understand better how to deal with contentious matters and that you seek to work constructively and collaboratively in the future. If you have any questions for me, let me know. Thank you for helping to build a better encyclopedia here at Wikipedia.

Notes

^ A source "directly supports" a given piece of material if the information is present explicitly in the source so that using this source to support the material is not a violation of Wikipedia:No original research. The location of any citation—including whether one is present in the article at all—is unrelated to whether a source directly supports the material. For questions about where and how to place citations, see Wikipedia:Citing sources, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section § Citations, etc.
^ Once an editor has provided any source they believe, in good faith, to be sufficient, then any editor who later removes the material must articulate specific problems that would justify its exclusion from Wikipedia (e.g. why the source is unreliable; the source does not support the claim; undue emphasis; unencyclopedic content; etc.). If necessary, all editors are then expected to help achieve consensus, and any problems with the text or sourcing should be fixed before the material is added back.

— Archer1234 (t·c) 00:10, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just one quick follow-up. I see you have given the same or similar edit summary to recent edits at:

For the reasons I gave above, I ask that you self-revert each of these and then if you have sources you can cite you add them. Thanks. — Archer1234 (t·c) 00:30, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Sensris. I see that you have resumed editing but have not yet addressed this issue or replied to these messages. I would appreciate some communication or indication that you will be addressing this issue. Thanks. — Archer1234 (t·c) 04:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding disruptive editing. The thread is Disruptive editing from User:Sensris. Thank you. — Archer1234 (t·c) 22:58, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 00:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

excuse me can you unblock me, I'll be careful next time

THANKS Sensris (talk) 06:47, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked[edit]

I want unblocked thanks Sensris (talk) 08:36, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you're serious about an unblock request, follow the instructions above and make sure to read WP:GAB. If you keep abusing your talkpage access I will revoke it. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:57, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

please unbloclked me Sensris (talk) 15:51, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sensris (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

for years I always improve the articles on wikipedia especially on the actors to add films of their article or to add texts of career of films, I like that, I always made so that it is a good article by adding articles. thank you for unblocking me, i will try to be careful next time Sensris (talk) 10:14, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for copyright violations, but do not discuss that in this request. 331dot (talk) 13:35, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS appeal #71435[edit]

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:37, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i want unblocked please

you can not open? Sensris (talk) 20:41, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I have no assurance you will not add material copyrighted elsewhere to Wikipedia, I cannot. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:41, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sir please, i don't mistake Sensris (talk) 19:53, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unblocked me[edit]

please unblocked ùe Sensris (talk) 15:52, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[directly_supports-1] A source "directly supports" a given piece of material if the information is present explicitly in the source so that using this source to support the material is not a violation of Wikipedia:No original research. The location of any citation—including whether one is present in the article at all—is unrelated to whether a source directly supports the material. For questions about where and how to place citations, see Wikipedia:Citing sources, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section § Citations, etc.

[2] Once an editor has provided any source they believe, in good faith, to be sufficient, then any editor who later removes the material must articulate specific problems that would justify its exclusion from Wikipedia (e.g. why the source is unreliable; the source does not support the claim; undue emphasis; unencyclopedic content; etc.). If necessary, all editors are then expected to help achieve consensus, and any problems with the text or sourcing should be fixed before the material is added back.

[a]

[b]