User talk:Shalominthehome

Welcome!

Hello, Shalominthehome, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Dawn bard (talk) 19:39, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Shmuley Boteach, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dawn bard (talk) 19:39, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shmuley Boteach[edit]

Please review Wikipedia's policies before you edit articles. You have made a few ninja edits. --Needsleep99 (talk) 06:06, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your January 26, 2011 Shmuley Boteach edits to an earlier version by User:Kenatipo; and User:Helperthorpe has readded his/her subsequent edits that were lost. You cut out way too much valid material and made the introductory paragraph way too long. Please review WP:Writing better articles,WP:Avoiding common mistakes, WP:BLP andWP:MOS before attempting to place the January 26th material again.--Hokeman (talk) 17:55, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shmuley Boteach[edit]

Please accept this note to use the talk page before you make edits. You have made considerable efforts previously to remove materials which wont be accepted. Jonathanglick13 (talk) 03:27, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Would be happy to discuss on talk any comments you may have... Am concerned about whitewashing. Jonathanglick13 (talk) 03:27, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 16:32, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shmuley Boteach[edit]

Do not vandalise said page again before engaging in discussion on talk page. Jonathangluck (talk) 16:38, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Shmuley Boteach, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jonathangluck (talk) 16:47, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest?[edit]

Your username, and the fact that you have only edited one article, with edits described by other editors as "promotional", "vandalism", "unconstructive" and "ninja edits", suggest that you may have a conflict of interest in ewditing this article. Are you associated with Boteach? If so, you would be well-advised to read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Autobiography before making any further edits, and to observe the guidelines therein. RolandR (talk) 16:58, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Over the years you have vandalised this page repeatedly. Discuss it before making changes. Jonathangluck (talk) 02:51, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

Informational note: this is to let you know that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Regards, --Demiurge1000 (talk) 18:31, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

There is a current discussion at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shalominthehome in which you have been accused of sock puppetry. Regards, Der yck C. 22:54, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple Accounts[edit]

It has been found that you have been using one or more account(s) abusively or have recruited meatpuppets (friends or coworkers who share your point of view and are recruited to support you; see the meatpuppet policy for more information). Please review the policy on acceptable alternate accounts. In short, alternate accounts or recruited people should not be used for the purposes of deceiving others into seeing more support for your position. It is not acceptable to use two accounts on the same article, or the same topic area.

Your other account(s) have been blocked indefinitely. This is your only warning. Please do not repeat this behaviour, or you will be indefinitely blocked from editing. -- DQ (t) (e) 18:44, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]