User talk:Shamansfriend

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Shamansfriend, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! jonkerz ♠talk 17:08, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Protected article[edit]

Hi! I saw your comment on Talk:Cocaine. Semi-protected articles can only be edited by confirmed and auto-confirmed users. I'll request an admin to confirm your account. Hold on! jonkerz ♠talk 17:09, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space[edit]

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Shamansfriend/Coca flour has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Coca flour, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 23:44, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

leave me fuck alone you whore! Dear Shaman,please do not take offense to me tryen to contact u here,I cannot for the life of me figure out wikipedia,but god I am sooooo happy your here.I edited cocatea/coca back in april,w/100 percent verifiable,truthful facts,.Take a look at the edits back then.This ,bondea deleted all of it.First claiming vandilism,when it is not.Then stating coca is cocaine,which we both IS NOT...PLEASE contact me,I have soo much info,truthful verifiable info that coca is only coca ALONE,NOT COCAINE IN ANY FORM,BUT AGAIN WIKIPEDIA CENSORED IT11:34, 18 July 2012 (UTC)paita,,p.s. the only reason I signed my post that way is I was threatened w/complete block because I did not use those 4 little thing.I am 100 percent behind u to get this truth out — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paitalona (talk • contribs)

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Coca flour, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jamietw (talk) 16:55, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback[edit]

It has now been accepted. Sorry for the delay and any inconvenience it may have caused.

Jamietw (talk) 16:56, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is this the shamans page?If so could u contact paitalona's page,and could u please read the coca te/coca page that was in place thru-out april and may of 2012.I am soo happy to have someone who knows the same fact/truth/and 100 percent verifiable info on this product from nature.There is NO COCAINE IN COCA,NONE.I published these truth then and it was censored/deleted,thank goodness a person who knows the scientific proof as I,,Paitalona (talk) 11:49, 18 July 2012 (UTC)paita[reply]