User talk:ShaneH1990

January 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm LM2000. I noticed that you made a change to an article, WrestleMania 31, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. LM2000 (talk) 17:39, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, ShaneH1990. I am Thatwweguy_619. I see that you edited Summerslam 2015, but you provided false information. It was already announced that the Izod Center will close soon and that Summerslam cannot be held there. Please contact me at my talk page If you need to ask any questions and/or correct me. Thanks. Thatwweguy 619 (talk) 02:25, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to WWE Fast Lane, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. CRRays Head90 | ^#RaysUp 20:39, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at WWE Fast Lane, you may be blocked from editing. CRRays Head90 | ^#RaysUp 06:18, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalizing? Dude thats not even the official poster — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShaneH1990 (talk • contribs)

First, please remember to sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~). Second, yes it is. It's the poster that WWE released to PPV provider Indemand. This is further supported by the fact the logo matched WWE.com. If you know of another poster, please link to it here and I'll do my research. And if it pans out, I will update it. In the meantime, I suggest you read WP:OR, WP:FUR and WP:ALT. CRRays Head90 | ^#RaysUp 07:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ron Killings. ~HackedBotato ^{Chat with me ♽ Contribs} 17:38, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't vandalise anything I simply posted facts

Hello, I'm Vjmlhds. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to WWE Fastlane because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Enough already. Vjmlhds 22:03, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at WWE Fastlane. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vjmlhds 05:18, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:ShaneH1990 reported by User:RealDealBillMcNeal (Result: ). Thank you. RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 19:00, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Daniel Bryan. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 22:58, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to No Way Out (2008). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. NiciVampireHeart 16:39, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The only one introducing incorrect information is you, the spinebuster happened inside the ring then Taker hit DDT on the steel and Batista pinned him, watch the bloody match the source is wrong

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at No Way Out (2008). NiciVampireHeart 11:28, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Poster caption on WrestleMania 31[edit]

Wrestling articles aren't just written for wrestling fans. They're are written in a neutral POV and out of universe so others can understand. You can't assume anything when it comes to who the reader is. CRRays Head90 | ^#RaysUp 02:48, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You just got back from a block and you've been warned about doing this before. You know better.LM2000 (talk) 06:08, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at WrestleMania XXX shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. LM2000 (talk) 09:31, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus was established at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Archive 85#Marketing terminology/Peacock terms to avoid using "Superstars" / "Divas" as much as possible. Abide by the old consensus, or start a discussion to establish a new one. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 09:33, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 13 March[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Alex Riley page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at WrestleMania XXV. NiciVampireHeart 14:20, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. — MusikAnimal ^talk 17:20, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for repeated addition of unsourced data. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WWE Universal Title[edit]

Until WWE or WWE.com says its vacant its not. WWE.com still has Finn Balor listed as Champ, it has not been vacated yet nor has he been stripped yet. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 23:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Twitter status saying he will means HE HASNT YET which means HE IS STILL CHAMPION. Stop changing it until it is offical he has Champion period. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 23:57, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, ShaneH1990. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, ShaneH1990. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, ShaneH1990. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]