User talk:Shawnc

I award this Barnstar to Shawnc for his fine contributions to everything martial arts related, especially for creating new articles and organizing categories.
March 5 2006, -Marcus-.

Welcome!

Hello, Shawnc, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Try our tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
Keep the Five Pillars of Wikipedia in mind, and remember to write from a neutral point of view.
Sign your posts on talk pages using the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~, or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~.
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

If you have any questions, see the help pages, ask a question at the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome, and good luck!

Kirill Lokshin 03:39, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

User Categorization -- Pingtung County[edit]

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Taiwan page as living in or being associated with Pingtung County. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Pingtung County for instructions. Rmky87 20:46, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Super Mario 64[edit]

This wasn't the first 3D platformer - there were others. It was just the most well-known and influential. Andre (talk) 19:43, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Appeal to consequences[edit]

Thanks, my full reply is on the article's talk page. slambo 18:27, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

MMAStatbox[edit]

Very funny indeed! (for other readers: Shawnc tried to add the MMAStatbox to the Royce Gracie archive just five seconds after I´ve added it myself!). They said great minds think the same at roughly the same time when surrounded by the same context (that´s why, they also claim, so many inventions happens to be "invented" by different people, in different places, at almost the same time). Hope it´s true, and not the other way around: "stupid people always think the same stupid things"... let´s hope we are the smart ones, not the stupid ones, only time will tell... (i´m in a kind of humorous mood tonight!) regards and thanks, Loudenvier 03:43, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Argumentum ad populum[edit]

hey shawnc, my fault, i confused the two ad-whatevers terms. i think the page looks good, whats the difference between renaming and redirecting? Spencerk 07:15, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Martial arts categorization[edit]

Happy to help. But based on what you have worked on, you have fallen into my trap: You might be the person who can handle the one category in the Sportspeople section that I can't: Martial arts practitioners. There's a large number of different martial arts (hapkido, for example) that I don't know's a subcategory of what. Sometimes an article states it (Jackie Chan doesn't practice kung fu, for example), but sometimes not. So without that knowledge I can't really handle the mass of uncategorized people in the Martial arts practitioners main page. Maybe you can?--Mike Selinker 14:40, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at Category:American_martial_artists. This is how I'd like to see all the martial artists categorized as they get moved out of the main section. Note that this will result in a single entry under the Category:Sportspeople by nationality subcategory of ("X" martial artists). Make sense? If so, please move anyone you feel comfortable moving appropriately.--Mike Selinker 21:08, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wushu vs Kung Fu[edit]

I am not too sure if the two terms are exactly referring to the same thing. As far as Hong Kong is concerned, it's called kung fu there, both in English and in Cantonese. — Insta ntnood 09:23, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome. People use kung fu and 功夫 predominantly whenever they talk about martial arts, e.g. to refer to the genre of films and dramas. In fact 武術 is far less frequently used, except for sport when 武術 is the official name of the particular events (e.g. Asian Games). — Insta ntnood 10:02, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

They may be similar, but I think the current articles are good enough to discuss the differences of the two terms, the history behind, while telling they're similar, and in some certain aspects the same thing. — Insta ntnood 20:40, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization[edit]

Greetings! I'm sorry that I haven't gotten back to you about the categorizations yet, but I've been a bit busy for the last couple of days in the "real world"... I think I'll be able to look it over tomorrow. Cheers! --Fire Star 04:31, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fireball[edit]

Yeah, I have used a few calculators after I made the picture based on a few rough numbers derived from Glasstone's book. I haven't had time though to really try and re-run the numbers to see what exactly it was that mine depicts, because it certainly isn't 20 kt vs. 1 Mt. But now that you've brought it up, I might take another look at it... --Fastfission 18:29, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Company[edit]

Shawn: Would you please modify Template:Infobox Company as you did Template:Infobox Celebrity? Thank you. Adraeus 18:58, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Movie[edit]

User:AzaToth has made some changes to the coding of Template:Infobox Movie. I'm not certain if those are good or appropriate changes. Would you please look the template over for errors? Thank you! Adraeus 04:50, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you! Adraeus 00:45, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Supersmashers[edit]

Hi, thanks a ton for the headsup. I speedy deleted it just now. btw, I am a new admin and it is my first delete. Great work, keep it up. --Gurubrahma 16:36, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a ton, man. speedy deleted Boyoscorporation as well. --Gurubrahma 16:49, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Messages for you[edit]

Hi! I seem to have received two messages ([1] and [2]) that I believe were intended for you. I'm terriby puzzled about how they ended up on my talk page, of course. —Kirill Lokshin 22:23, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

One of the messages is from me, Ken Mayer. I don't know how these bizarre talk/discussion pages work. Shawn sent me a message. I clicked on Shawn's name, got Shawn's user page, which says leave a note on Shawn's discussion page.

At the top of Shawn's discussion page there's a note from Kirill ending "If you have any questions, see the help pages, ask a question at the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome, and good luck!

Kirill Lokshin 03:39, August 17, 2005 (UTC)"

I was just following orders, I didn't know whether Shawnc and Kirill Lokshin are the same person. So my message ended up on Kirill's page. I suggest removing Kirill's greeting from the beginning of Shawn's discussion page.

--Kenmayer 16:19, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Exercise equipment/Exercise machine[edit]

Howdy. I removed the merge tags. Click over and take a look at the differences. If you want to know why, the answers are because I say so and because everyone I asked agrees. (just kidding). The stub tags are still there, so these two pages can grow apart like an old married couple... --24.221.8.253 06:25, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: J-Russ[edit]

LOL, double CSD tagged =-=-J\/\/estbrook 17:13, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Feelthedeal[edit]

Thank you for (correctly) listing this article for deletion. However, spam is not grounds for speedy deletion, and it must be voted at AFD--File Éireann 18:05, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Biographies +Tarquin Gunnell[edit]

Is there a template for that talk message? WAvegetarian ^(talk) (email) ^(contribs) 21:28, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome. Thanks.

WAvegetarian ^(talk) (email) ^(contribs) 22:00, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That was an accident. I know that auto-sigs don't work in templates. I'm using a friends laptop and it's giving me some problems. I must have inadvertantly switched browser windows and mistaken it for the talk page I had just used it on. Sorry. WAvegetarian ^(talk) (email) ^(contribs) 23:02, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

explanation[edit]

(diff) (hist) . . Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freakofnurture; 16:19 . . Shawnc (Talk) (the {{db-atk}} tag is for speedy deletes only)

Some n00b got got upset with me for nominating his article, G.I.S.T, for deletion. So he put {{afd}} on my user page [3] and went so far as to create a discussion page for it. I don't find this amusing. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 22:25, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

unprotection[edit]

go for it. Please drop me a line on your talk page when you're done, so i can reprotect it. Nandesuka 07:03, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I reprotected it, since it looked like you made your change. Let me know if you need it unprotected again (or reverted). Nandesuka 07:18, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please join[edit]

Hi, Shawn,

Please join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Asian martial arts.

P0M 20:39, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nero[edit]

I found that it reported no errors when subsequently I found that there were; and funnily did find errors when there weren't any. This was verion 6.x, they may have addressed it in v7. I use this to verify my discs now. --Paul 08:17, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Advice request[edit]

Thanks, Shawnc! I was looking around and find the contributors generally include a bit description of themselves. I find that gives me some perspectives to their entries. I am all for deleting anything that does not fit into the guideline of Wikipedia. Is it advisable that I delete the main article "Hal.Lee-McWhorter"? Also, as I am not familiar with the rules, what is a "user page" as compare to a main article? Regards, - Hal

Advice request - follow-up[edit]

Hi Shawnc, I moved the text to the user page following the link you provided - thanks! I realize the main article page has already been deleted. Regards, - Hal

CSD templates[edit]

I answered on on the db-reason talk page, as you indicated. It will be nice to have a centralized discussion there, I think there has been too much ad-hockery with those templates. Jamie ^{(talk/contribs)} 13:09, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think that 'nocat' is a very bad idea. It's only reason for existence seems to be that it makes testing the templates easier (but anybody who doesn't know who templates work has no business working with speedy deletions); and if this parameter is used improperly it will mess up the category system, by listing speedy-deletable articles in the wrong category, or nowhere at all. R adiant _>|< 18:11, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Alright![edit]

I'll try to find appropriate references. I've tried to have links in the major articles i've written, but the stubs are incomplete in that aspect. Which facts or terms do you think that should be referenced, and do you mean footnoting? Also, is it enough with external links in some stubs, or should there be a specific "references" section?

And about the armlock article. I was working on it yesterday, and was going to propose that the stubs armbar and shoulderlock would be merged into it. The reason is that there is confusion about whether keylocks are shoulderlocks or elbow locks(alnd if i include some elbow locks i should include armbars too). And after looking into the matter i found out that they can be either one, which was why i tried to write an integrated article. I fell asleep yesterday before i could put up "suggested merging" signs ont he other articles. If the armlock article gets too crowded we can separate it, but so far it looks logical and resonable i think.

Anyways, great job with the grappling categories, i think they'll come in handy, and also all the work you've done in the martial arts section. ---Marcus- 12:24, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So what do you think about merging armlocks to the elbow and shoulder? I've got the discussion here: Talk:Armlock ---Marcus- 13:33, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wong Jack Man[edit]

(From Talk:Bruce_Lee) I've wanted to read that Chinese Pacific Weekly article for a long time, and you're the first person I know of who has seen it. Could you possibly get a digital copy of it? I could probably do a translation of it for interested readers. Shawnc 14:49, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do my best. I saw it at my friend's father's house (he studied under Wong Jack Man) years ago. I haven't spoken to my friend's dad in a while, but I will try to connect with him and at least get another look at the article. He still lives here in Oakland, so hopefully I can make it happen. Evidentally I arrived at a holiday party about a half hour after he had left a few weeks ago, and I was going to ask him about it. Another reason to be on time. At least occasionally. Reggaedelgado 00:37, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

unsourced[edit]

You really shouldn't be adding this tag to all sorts of random undisputed pages. I noticed these:

It seems you've decorated a bunch of martial arts articles as well. You're doing two things:

needlessly calling in to question the accuracy and NPOV of articles
making the "unsourced" template become ignorable

A bit more on that second problem: Most people instinctively click "OK" when a Windows dialog box pops up. Mentally, there is little awareness that the dialog box was ever there. People click "OK" before they really see the damn thing. They have been conditioned to be this way by the overuse of annoying dialog boxes.

Tagging articles all the time will make the tagging be ignored. It becomes invisible to frequent wikipedia visitors, while being disturbing to new visitors. This is bad.

If you do have some major concern, spell it out on the talk page. It may be that the experts find something to be way too obvious and well-known to document. (if we documented every fact, the documentation would outweigh the articles by 100 to 1)

24.110.60.225 03:17, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The articles I tagged did not cite references or external links, hence the tag of "unsourced". Please refer to Wikipedia:Verifiability: "When adding information: The burden of evidence lies with the editor who has made the edit. Editors should therefore provide references. Any edit lacking a source may be removed." The accuracy of all unsourced article are in question of violating Wikipedia:No original research, such as in John Seigenthaler Sr. Wikipedia biography controversy. Shawnc 03:29, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fedor's Muay Thai[edit]

Shawnc, Fedor trains in Muay Thai frequently in Muay Thai with Ernesto Hoost in Holland at the Vos Gym. It is mentioned here:

http://www.graciemag.com/?c=147&a=3191 Rizzo: That is it. And Fedor looks like a small refrigerator on top with those little legs underneath. But he invests a lot in training: the same way Rodrigo goes to Cuba and I go to Holland, Fedor is now in Holland all the time training muay thai with Ernesto Hoost.

http://www.muaythaibrno.cz/links/news.php?id=397&lang=english The official website of Fedor Emelianenko reports that Fedor flew to Holland on January 28th , and will be training his Muay Thai technique with 4-time K-1 champion Ernesto Hoost .

http://fedor.bel.ru/index_eng.shtml?id=25

http://fedor.bel.ru/index_eng.shtml?id=24

Contrast ratio[edit]

Hi, added sources to most of the material and removed the unsourced template added by you. I haven't written the entire article so it was a bit difficult to find all the needed references, but I think that about half of the most important points are now covered. I'll add some more soon. Talk back on my user page if you have a comment to drop. Santtus 12:04, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:nn-warn2[edit]

I created nn-warn2 for my own purposes, but if someone else finds it useful then of course it should be in the main template space. Thank you for engineering this move. --Alex 00:11, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Bruce Lee[edit]

Greetings. I've added the talk page to my watchlist. It looks like the blanker's IPs are one-timers so far, which limits us to reverting for now, but I'll keep an eye on it. --Fire Star 00:33, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

jkd[edit]

Personally,man which is the best Chinese martial art?Batzarro 05:10, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Practical[edit]

I am interested in something practical. I tried Karate before but it sucks bigtime. How is korean hapkido. I am interested in Wing Chun too but Choy li fut does not sound bad.

Anyway,which style focuses on grappling? Batzarro 14:13, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

cap[edit]

Wot do u think of capoeira man Batzarro 08:41, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am interested in grappling. Which style is the most PRACTICAL :hapkido,aikido,san shou,choy li fut.

HAve you done ninjutsu? It sounds like a classic example of bull shido crap.

I have tried shotokan,boxing and some karate. I was disappointed in all but boxing. Batzarro 13:39, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox Automobile changes[edit]

FYI, as noted in the discussion page, I have changed the syntax for Template:Infobox Automobile in a few areas: "engine" and "body_style" are no longer plural; "shares_with" has become "related"; and "similar_cars" is now just "similar". Thanks for your contributions! --SFoskett 14:42, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lindsay Lohan and Karen Dotrice[edit]

Wups... thanks for catching that :) Radio Kirk talk to me 18:37, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RadioKirk, I was just about to inform you of my edit, but you got to me first. Keep up the good work. :-) Shawnc 18:39, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Not a problem, and thanks again. I'm still beaming over my first Featured Article—one that didn't even exist before 12 December. :-D Radio Kirk talk to me 18:42, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Feature Article status is great to hear. I only hope we get more editors like you on this project! Shawnc 18:50, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Much appreciated, thank you :-) Radio Kirk talk to me 18:58, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More Bruce Lee[edit]

Greetings, I have been having the beginnings of a revert battle with a new user at the Bruce Lee article, I was wondering if you'd be kind enough to look in and give an opinion? Thanks, --Fire Star 03:04, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You[edit]

I just wanted to say thank you for restoring the archived talk page for 2001: A Space Odyssey. I thought that there were some interesting items on it and it is nice to be able to send friends there to read the discussions. It was a good idea to seperate the book and the movie and I didn't say that in my original note so to you and whomever else may have worked on it - Thanks User:MarnetteD | Talk 15:31, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Canada[edit]

Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there!--DarkEvil 17:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Xian Xing Zhe, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Gurubrahma 17:49, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:BEngineering_2001_Edonis.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:BEngineering_2001_Edonis.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo.

(Fairuse tag added.) Shawnc 13:46, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Linking to Wiktionary[edit]

Hi Shawnc —

I'm wondering whether it is really necessary to link all thse articles to Wiktionary. In these articles with non-English words (capoeira, bremsstrahlung, übermensch etc) the wiktionary articles never add more information, and half the time just repeat the first line of the article. If a reader can't gain any more information by clicking on a link in an article, then I would question its value. — Asbestos | Talk (RFC) 12:55, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there logic?[edit]

Is there some logic in adding the Category:Chinese martial arts to articles where you had deleted that category only a little while ago? Also considering that Category:Traditional wushu is already a subset of Category:Chinese martial arts? --JohJak2 11:43, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I followed your directions. But why then not immediately remove the trad. wushu and contemp. wushu cats removed. You have my blessing :). --JohJak2 12:07, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

Sure, i will add my (biased) sources as soon as I have finished added some pages. Thanks. -User:Jah69uk

jah69uk Articles[edit]

Could you possibly delete all my articlex except IRSG, International Solidarity Foundation and Wolfe Tone Soicety. Thanks

wikilinking[edit]

World War II was the single deadliest conflict the world has ever seen, causing many tens of millions of deaths. The tables below provide a detailed country-by-country count of death by side.

What should not be linked: plain English words like "deaths". People know what the word means; there is no need to call attention to it or refer them to the article on death.

What should be linked: Technical terms, unless they are fully defined in the article. However, "death" is not a technical term. Neither is "conflict"

What should also be linked: Major connections with the subject of another article that will help readers to understand the current article more fully. This can include people, events and topics that already have an article or that clearly deserve one, as long as the link is relevant to the article in question.

Linking to "death" does not help a person understand WWII deaths; the topic of who died in WWII is a political and social one; it is not about what happens when the individual dies.

Only make links that are relevant to the context. Drogo Underburrow 07:58, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects from subtopics[edit]

Why did you move all these templates around? You broke the categorization! Category redirect doesn't work. The "rewrite" puts everything into blank. The previous discussion was Keep. Although there was a suggestion that some might be renamed individually, you didn't follow the template or category rename process.

--William Allen Simpson 15:24, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to the discussion at Template talk:R with possibilities. The template was poorly named and will be renamed unless new objections are raised. Shawnc 17:27, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Amazingly enough, I can read, such as the dates on the comments. When folks don't rename something, it's usually because it's a bad idea. Especially as the previous TfD wasn't successful. In this case, many things other than subtopics are in the category.

Moreover, there were some rather serious errors in your work. Heck, you didn't even bother to fix the numerous double redirects you created. It's taken me a couple of hours to fix. Please don't do that again.

--William Allen Simpson 17:35, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There was a concensus on renaming the template, so could you please join the discussion there? Thanks. Shawnc 17:43, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Firmly disagree. Moreover, you are referring to a couple of offhand comments amde on the talk page 6 months ago. Finally, please follow the Talk convention and keep this on your page, rather than posting your responses to mine....

--William Allen Simpson 17:49, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Simpson, let's discuss the proposals at Template talk:R with possibilities. Shawnc 17:52, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:R with possibilities[edit]

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I've commented on the subject and dug up/revived my old suggestion for these templates (User:Pengo/R). —Pengo 22:44, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ad hominem references[edit]

Hi Shawnc,

thanks for you input on the Ad hominem page. You are quite correct that the page doesn't cite its sources; however, I would be very grateful if on the article's talk page, you could maybe indicate which sections in particular need references. I ask this because having the banner at the top of the page gives the impression to the casual reader that there is possibly erroneous or contentious information on the page, or that some datum within is in dispute, when, to the best of my knowledge, this is not the case. I do feel that a discussion on the talk page would be a better way to go than using the "unsourced" tag; you have obviously identified some problem areas, and by sharing them, we can get some sources on there much quicker.

I look forward to your input, and thanks again. MartinRobinson 02:22, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review request[edit]

Hi Shawn,

I saw your name on a bunch of martial arts pages. My article on cutmen is currently undergoing peer review: could you look at it and see if you have any feedback for me?

Thank you! -- CasualFighter 14:45, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Contrast ratio[edit]

Hi, I've liked your contributions to some articles on display devices and related subjects. You might want to check out what I've done for the article on contrast ratio. Santtus 12:07, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unsigned message removal[edit]

Hello, I saw your comments regarding the removal of unsigned messages by users on Template talk:Unsigned. Do you know if there is any consensus on this matter? Presently, there is a user who is removing all unsigned messages from an article talk page (mostly consisting of his comments) and I was wondering where you stand on this. The motivation of the user appears to be based on a comment he made. By removing signatures, the user can give a false impression of "consensus" for his views, since the dozens of unsigned comments make it look like more than one person is supporting his position. Can you recommend any course of action? —Viriditas | Talk 22:13, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick reply. I'm going out for a bit, but when I return I'll try to think of something. —Viriditas | Talk 22:57, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've made brief comments on both Wikipedia talk:Sign your posts on talk pages and Template talk:Unsigned. On one hand, it seems that the removal of signatures is disruptive, interferes with effective discussion, and approaches vandalism. On the other hand, if someone doesn't want to use their signature on their own talk page or in their user space, I think that should be allowed. Do you have an opinion on this matter? —Viriditas | Talk 09:27, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Motion Sickness[edit]

I posted this on first person shooter but I'm posting it again so that I'm sure you get it. I don't suffer from motion sickness wile playing FPSs, but PC Gamer has gone of this many times, and if I remember correctly, they suggested motion sickness pills. Gewehr

They did not recomend any one motion sickness pill, or type of pill, if I remeber correctly, and I cannot rember what issue it was in. They answer the question fairly often, and if it comes up again, I'll let you know. Gewehr

Alexis Bledel is multiracial.[edit]

Her father is Argentine and her mother is white. Argentine is in South America not Europe. (Oahc)

So she's not multiracial? Is she considered Caucasian? Someone told me Latinos and Caucasians are different races....how come they are the same? (Oahc)

Marloes Coenen[edit]

Hi I saw you uploaded the picture about Marloes Coenen. I am sure that you used a picture of somebody else, that picture is *NOT* Marloes coenen for sure. I have uploaded a correct picture of her. Europimp 09:08, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

name change of article Edward Seykota[edit]

Hello

Please vote on the name change of article Edward Seykota , please vote here Talk:Edward Seykota wether you Oppose or Approve.
Thank you.
Trade2tradewell 11:27, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:395px-Keratoconus1-800-edit.png[edit]

Hi,

I noticed Image:395px-Keratoconus1-800-edit.png and had to ask you to not publish this sort of edit in the future. If a reputable news magazine had run your edited photo, then the photo editor would have been fired. Journalists consider this sort of editing a breach of ethics because you are essentially "reporting" something that never happened. By editing the photo you may be inadvertently reducing the red blood vessel count in the eyelid which may be a critical part of diagnosis, or something. We need to keep the photos here real - we're not reporters most of the time, but the articles of Wikipedia serve a similar role.

I don't mean to be unduly harsh; I did see a lot of people were freaked out by that photo; but photo editing is extremely controversial in journalism (and by extension ought to be controversial here). There's an ongoing war about it, and it's considered especially bad if central concepts conveyed by the photo are altered.

Cheers - Tempshill 04:24, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice boxing picture. I would add in addition to the above that altered photographs violate WP:NOR. Tempshill 06:01, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of paragraphs after the line you cited in WP:NOR, though, it's stated:

A known disadvantage of allowing original photographs to be uploaded is the possibility of editors using photo manipulation to distort the facts or position being illustrated by the photo. Manipulated images should be prominently noted as such and, if they are not, should be posted to Wikipedia:Images for deletion. Even noted as having been manipulated, they should not be used to illustrate articles in the main namespace, although editors are free to make use of them on user pages.

Tempshill 21:58, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say the featuring of the water drop picture was an error. It's convincing but is manufactured and is not an illustration of reality as it purports (AFAIK) to be. Altered photos don't belong on Wikipedia for the reasons above. This isn't a new debate; it's been all the rage in journalism ethics classes for the last 20 years. National Geographic moving the two big pyramids together (they did it for aesthetics too, for a cover) caught them a lot of flak for the same reason: Something is being illustrated which is false. Essentially this is original research. I'll go about seeking to expand the NOR page on why. Tempshill 04:56, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As the (co-)author of Image:Water drop animation enhanced small.gif, I think this WP:NOR interpretation is ridiculous. We went to great length to make the water drop image as accurate as possible within the technical limitations. If you would film a single drop, it would look just like this, with the exception of the timing. By your stance, every image on Wikipedia (digital, or on film and scanned) falls under WP:NOR, since the photographer has selected an exposure and a film type, possibly used a filter and a tele, macro, or wide angle lens, and hence the image is not as you would see it. -- Chris 73 | Talk 16:39, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fully support Chris 73 on this topic --Fir0002 11:33, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Rikki.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Rikki.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:08, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Masutatsu Oyama[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Masutatsu_Oyama Taeguk Warrior 12:18, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox "if" parameters[edit]

Hi. You seem to know about "if" parameters in infoxboxes. Could you take a look at Template:RAF Squadron? I've changed the {{{image}}} parameter OK, but I can't seem to get the {{{honours}}} parameter to be optional. Could you fix it for me or let me know how to? Thanks very much, Mark83 20:25, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Mark83 21:44, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stock Exchange World Wide[edit]

I have started a group and maybe you would like to join. Wikipedia:WikiProject Stock Exchange World Wide I could use your help. John R G 17:51, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

commons:Wushu (sport)[edit]

Hi Shawnc, we have to delete all images from the Commons article commons:Wushu (sport) because the original licence from the source say "Copyright © Wushu One Family, licensed under a Creative Commons License" (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/) but CC-by-nc-nd is not allowed on commons. Sorry. --Raymond de 20:03, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently trying to get permission from w1f.net. -- mh 12:58, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man. I see that you have gotten permission from them. I sent out an email but did not received a reply. Btw, I want to point out that this image depicts the Jian (straightsword), not the Dao (sword) (broadsword). I have re-uploaded it here. -- mh 12:37, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Asian_martial_arts[edit]

This project seems to have died - you're listed as a participant, perhaps we can join with Wikipedia:WikiProject_Martial_Arts (which also seems to have died) and revitalise the aims of both. -- Medains 08:30, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Stock Exchange World Wide[edit]

That sounds like a good idea. I will join the other group. John R G 05:22, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects[edit]

Hi, I just moved a couple of redirects you created (namely Yung Chi Kin and Larry Yung Chi Kin, after they were tagged for speedy deletion under CSD R3. I'm curious if you really meant them to be in a non-standard charset; if so, my apologies. What charset is that, anyway? -- Visviva 10:05, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Mata leao 'Kill the Lion' (Rear Naked Choke).jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Mata leao 'Kill the Lion' (Rear Naked Choke).jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:41, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New Video Game Article[edit]

Hey! I saw that you created a new video game related article- consider joining the Computer and Video Games WikiProject! I have added your article to the list of new articles, and attributed it to you. --PresN 14:43, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tatsuya Kawajiri.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Tatsuya Kawajiri.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 21:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Crazy Monkey Boxing[edit]

Hi, I saw that you tagged verify on the Crazy Monkey article. Could you specify what exactly you believe to be unverified? I believe the article can be verified with the external links. Thanks. --Mista-X 02:27, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More replaceable fair use images[edit]

Image:Tsuyoshi Kohsaka.jpg

—Chowbok ☠ 22:22, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not recreate deleted content[edit]

Please do not recreate deleted content as you did with The Sims: Life Stories, see [4] and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Sims:_Life_Stories--Crossmr 15:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

Yes, sure looks like those are replaceable. Feel free to tag them. —Chowbok ☠ 18:35, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Smiley Award[edit]

Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward

User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward5b

Copyrighted MMA images[edit]

Hi Abu badali, you commented on Image talk:Tatsuya Kawajiri.jpg that the image does not qualify under fair use because it does not satisfy "No free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information." I asked what this means at the WikiProject because I can not find a free image for it. What do you think about other similarly copyrighted images such as: Image:Fedor.jpg, Image:Mirko Filipovic.jpg, Image:Wanderlei de Silva.JPG, Image:Matt-hughes.jpg, Image:GeorgesStPierre.jpg and so on -- do you think they are fair use or not? Thanks. Shawnc 17:27, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for taking this lonk to reply. I don't exaclty remember what the image Image:Tatsuya Kawajiri.jpg was about, so I'll have to comment on the other ones. I hope this could clarify the matter, but if it doesn't, do be shy to drop me another note whenever you want.

As you may know, unfree copyrighted images can only be used on Wikipedia in accordance to Wikipedia's policy on unfree materia. Note that, altough this policy is called "'Fair use criteria", it's not to be confused with the Fair use concept on U.S. law. Wikipedia's criteria is a stricter set of requirements.

Images Image:Mirko Filipovic.jpg, Image:GeorgesStPierre.jpg and Image:Wanderlei de Silva.JPG are unfree and, as such, should only be used in accordance with the above mentioned criteria. But unfortunatelly, it seems they fail the very first criterion, that says we only use unfree images when it's not possible to create a free alternative. This criterion, for instance, rules out virtually all images of living people that are used to illustrate the person on a bio article. Yes, this is also the most abused criterion. But it's almost always abused in good faith, as this criterion has not being enforced in the last years, and a huge number of unfree images of living people, cars, household object, etc were uploaded to Wikipedia servers.

The rationale behind this rule is that when we use an unfree image on some article, editor would not have motivations to upload free images. And one of the Wikipedia's goals is to increase the amount of free knowledge in the world.

Image:Matt-hughes.jpg has no licensing tag, and, if not fixed, may be deleted in 7 days.

As a last point, as someone interested in martial arts, do you use to attend presentations? If so, to you use to take a camera? You could realease some pictures unfree a free license, so that they could be used here. You shouldn't be shy if some of them doesn't look as good as official publicity images. They will be a great contribution to Wikipedia and it's goals. Or if you don't have such pictures, you may know people who does. Or take part in foruns of martial arts fans where someone could be interested in makeing such contributions. Wikipedia is in need of free images and we could help.

I hope this was informative. Let me know if you still have any questions. Best regards, --Abu Badali 17:36, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Shawn, sorry that was the only image i have of GSP. I took it with my camera phone when i bumped into him at the WAT gym. -nmenez

Understood[edit]

I understand your request. I am only posting the data to 'boron additive' now, and there will be no product 'promotion'. I am only an avid user of the additive - not a representative or advertiser.

Please take into consideration the fact that this is not pseudo-science, but is in fact internationally recognized by scientists in many laboratories. I do feel there should be a link to the only known distributor, for the use or getting more information or obtaining the product for use.

I will tag holdon until I become more familiar with citations, so I can make the reports and other resources linked clearly and understandably.

- Camden —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Camdenz (talk • contribs) 17:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can[edit]

The article Braveheart, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup.

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page.

Consumption tax[edit]

I noticed you added a merge tag to this article but did not add a corresponding merge tag on the VAT article. You also did not put anything in the talk of either page or more importantly the VAT talk. I was planning to vote against the merge as a consumption tax can take many forms (sales taxes, property taxes, and even income taxes). So.. I figured I would drop a note and see if you were going to finish the merge tag process or perhaps remove the tag. Morphh ^(talk) 18:59, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Lee flexing his muscles in the 1972 movie Way of the Dragon. Frontal shot[edit]

Good day, Shawnc I were wondering about the photo you updated "Bruce Lee flexing his muscles in the 1972 movie Way of the Dragon. Frontal shot" I think this is your best work yet this is the picture that truly shows Bruce Lee's physique. I were wondering if you have the same picture but in a bigger resolution or could you tell me where to get it. Thanks, Maikeo —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Maikeo99 (talk • contribs) 06:00, 28 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Foreign influences on Chinese martial arts[edit]

Your placement of the lines was in question not the information itself. In fact, the article explicitely mentions that "Chinese martial arts, like martial arts of Greece and India, have existed before the arrival of Bodhidharma." _{Freedom skies| talk} 19:45, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did write a bit there. Your concerns are very genuine. I was about to implement my solution in a min. Well, visit here in about 3 mins and see if your concerns are addressed. _{Freedom skies| talk}

Did that help ? _{Freedom skies| talk} 19:58, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good thing we were on at the same time. I'm going to be very busy for the coming few days and thought it would be best to resolve it here and now. If you feel that your concerns have been addressed adequatey then please mention it on the talk page of the article. _{Freedom skies| talk} 20:22, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I removed the later portion and put the Wren mention in the intro. It was that way in the original form but changed in subsequent edits (the intro).

I removed these lines:-

Chinese armies during the Zhou Dynasty (12th to 3rd century BC) were known to practice, jiao li<>Classic of Rites. Chapter 6, Yuèlìng. Line 108.<> a form of wrestling derived from an earlier form known as jiao di.<>Chinese Kuoshu Institute. History of Shuai Jiao. <URL accessed January 26 2006><>

I never actually did put either the Greek art of Pankration, the Indian Mallayuddha or Shuai Jiao in the first place in this para:-

Chinese martial arts, like martial arts of Greece and India, have existed before the arrival of Bodhidharma. Bodhidharma's status in martial arts is due to his role in the institutionalization of Chinese martial arts, presumably by introducing excercises, meditation, discipline, newer techniques etc. to the native fighting methods during his tenure at the Shaolin monastery.

Examples were unnessasary and links to Pankration, Indian martial arts and Chinese martial arts are given in the article.

Thanks for making haste. _{Freedom skies| talk} 20:35, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:PRIDE FC logo.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:PRIDE FC logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:34, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Two finger pushup bruce lee 1964aug2 long beach.JPG)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Two finger pushup bruce lee 1964aug2 long beach.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 22:17, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help me write this article?[edit]

Hello,

I was wondering if you would be willing to help me write either Seikichi_Iha or Shorin-ryu_Shido-kan. Tkjazzer 21:48, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:David_Abbott_benchpress_600lb.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:David_Abbott_benchpress_600lb.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:48, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:The.Way.Of.The.Dragon.1972.Bruce.Lee.flex.front.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:The.Way.Of.The.Dragon.1972.Bruce.Lee.flex.front.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:22, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Richmond Olympic Oval comic.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Richmond Olympic Oval comic.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:53, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image help[edit]

Could you please take a look at Image:TheFreelancer-LSHS.png and let me know if it has everything it needs to avoid deletion? Thank you. --Victor [talk] 05:42, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Lee[edit]

On the Bruce Lee feats sections, material cited with books, documentaries, and valid websites are not to be removed without valid reason. I've given proper citations for those books, documentaries, and websites. If you want to check them out, you are free to do so.--WalAloe 06:56, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re:Seeking assistance[edit]

Bruce Lee is one of my watch list pages so I generally check it throughtout the week. --Xiahou 21:12, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bernard Arnault.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bernard Arnault.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. KFP (talk | contribs) 21:18, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Hayato_Sakurai.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Hayato_Sakurai.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 08:52, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

eye tracker[edit]

Thanks for merging! Tony 02:01, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Diablo 2[edit]

Hi Shawn,

       How many disks come in the diablo 2 computer game package, 3 or 4? Please email me the answer at clcook1059@aol.com. Thanks.
                              Chuck C  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.221.246.139 (talk) 20:04, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

k-1 logo[edit]

Hi there, I saw you uploaded the K-1 logo (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e3/K-1.png). I'm trying to write the wiki of the K-1 in italian language, but I don't know if i can use the image in the italian version. How did you get the image? Can I use it? How? Should I inform someone? Thanks Gabriele http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Zionthelion

This is a logo of an organization, item, or event, and is protected by copyright and/or trademark. It is believed that the use of low-resolution images on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, of logos for certain uses involving identification and critical commentary may qualify as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. Certain commercial use of this image may also be trademark infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content and Wikipedia:Logos.

This tag is meaningless without an accompanying fair use rationale which must be unique to the usage of THIS image in each article in which it is used. You must also give the source and copyright information for all fair-use images uploaded.

Use of the logo here does not imply endorsement of the organization by Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation, nor does it imply endorsement of Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation by the organization.

Gomi[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gomi, because another editor is suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Agamemnon2 (talk) 06:33, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Windows 98 setup error.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Windows 98 setup error.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Torontostockexchange TSX logo.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Torontostockexchange TSX logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 00:52, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yo-Yo Ma[edit]

Please make the necessary changes. If you look at the edit in question, including the recent page history, you will see that the page was the subject of vandalism. If these particular edits were lost in the reversion, I apologize, but the last edit did make some strange changes to formatting and the information about the loss of Ma's violin that were not supported by the references. Please reinsert the material you are concerned about manually, without reverting to that version. Thank you. —Viriditas | Talk 01:07, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Yuan Yida[edit]

An editor has nominated Yuan Yida, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuan Yida and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:14, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Toshiba_HD-XA1.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Toshiba_HD-XA1.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 23:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:K-1.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:K-1.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 08:49, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chi Mei[edit]

You can also add Chi Mei to your lsit of created stubs.

After I translated your article to german wikipedia, we are wondering what "AS" stands for. I already asked on the talk page, but yet no one answerd. May you help, please? 124.8.81.105 (talk) 17:54, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cover of Pop Science Mar 2006 Cover 1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cover of Pop Science Mar 2006 Cover 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fist_of_Fury.jpg[edit]

I have tagged Image:Fist_of_Fury.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 22:12, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Merge of Gracie Barra/Gracie Barra Combat Team[edit]

A merger of these two articles is being proposed. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Gracie Barra Combat Team Talk Page and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). In addition, if you feel that any changes are needed on either page, feel free to edit either page. Unak78 (talk) 23:54, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your merges[edit]

These don't need to be history merged. Most of them have an article history and a redirect history. Are you trying to move them to the lower case versions? I think what you're really looking for is WP:RM. Cool Hand Luke 05:57, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anyhow, if that's what you're trying to do, I'll move them all for you. Cool Hand Luke 05:59, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're apparently offline, but I see that is indeed what you're trying to do. I'll move the articles. Cool Hand Luke 06:02, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Improving Bill Gates to Featured Article status[edit]

I am currently improving Bill Gates to Featured Article status, and noticed that you made substantial contributions to the article recently. If you have time, please help out in improving the article to Featured Article status. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 02:34, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Harai goshi[edit]

Can you please expand the "Technique History" of the article Harai goshi. The section is completely blank now and hence the article looks bad. All the sections should be uniformed. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 18:24, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have formatted the article so that no section remains blank. However the section titled "Technique History" is needed, but it should be complete well-written section, not a simple heading only. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 18:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It will be also good if you use some inline citation for the article. Thanks. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 18:30, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BEngineering 2001 Edonis.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:BEngineering 2001 Edonis.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:50, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:One inch punch bruce lee 1964aug2 long beach.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:One inch punch bruce lee 1964aug2 long beach.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:14, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You post IT'S SHOWTIME match infomation: 2008-11-29 Albert Kraus_W vs Buakaw_L Don`t you know, where i can take this fight video?

teo_gun@mail.ru

Systema subcategories[edit]

Hello, you look to be a very active person involved in many conversations, as I can see from this extensive page dating back to 2005. It sure looks like it's worth archiving ;) Anywho, I noticed some subcategories of Category:Systema namely Category:Systema practitioners you created in 2005, the subsequent Category:Category:Systema practitioners by nationality created by User:Scottalter in 2007. You also created Category:Canadian Systema practitioners in 2005 which was placed into this with the newer Category:Russian Systema practitioners created by User:Sysy.

What I am wondering is, since there are so few Systema practitioners currently with biographical articles (3 russians, and 1 of them is also Canadian, so 3 in total rather than 4) do you think such extensive subcategorizing is required at this point? I have no way of knowing how things used to be, but were there initially more people with articles placed in these categories and they got deleted or something? I am trying to figure this out because obviously more than 3 people know Systema, but I know there are people who delete a lot of informative articles on the 'notability' precept. Do you think it might be interesting to create a Systema task force under the WikiProject Martial arts and WikiProject Russian history? Or perhaps a 'russian martial arts task force' with a Systema Taskforce being part of that?

I am especially confused by the whole Kadochnikov vs. Ryabko disputes, and looking at some of the talk pages it almost looks as if edit wars have occured and that there are ill feelings between editors. Would it be worthwhile to have something like this to help resolve this so that it could lead to mutual protection of all articles concerning the two forms, because as it is, I expect each article's advocates may support deletioninsts in harming their rival's, and in the end everyone loses out to people trying to delete information on martial arts in general, and then inevitably Wikipedia is nothing other than descriptions of Pokemon and that is not desirable. Do you think Scottalter or Sysy or other editors would be interested in this? I find that people who get involved with editing the categories are concerned with order and preservation above and beyond those who merely edit only the main articles. Tyciol (talk) 20:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Triangle choke.jpg[edit]

File:Triangle choke.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Image939-triangle choke.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Image939-triangle choke.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 17:56, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Canon HV40[edit]

I have nominated Canon HV40, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canon DV 012. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ejfetters (talk) 01:25, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please update your status with WP:VG[edit]

Dear WikiProject Video games member,

You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or {{User WPVG}} somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in recent months.

The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.

All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:

Editing video game-related pages in the Article namespace
Participating in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)

Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

—WikiProject Video games (delivery by xenobot 03:43, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shawnc. You have new messages at Seb az86556's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

"Ganfyd" AfD[edit]

I have submitted "Ganfyd" to AfD. Axl ¤ [Talk] 21:52, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another gentle ping from WP:VG[edit]

Dear Shawnc,

You are receiving this message because either [[Category:WikiProject Video games members]] or {{User WPVG}} is somewhere in your userspace, and you are currently listed in the "Unknown" section on the project's member list.

The member list is meant to provide a clearer picture of active membership. It is recommended that you update your status if you plan to regularly:

Edit video game-related pages in the Article namespace
Participate in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)

Members listed in the "Unknown" section will be removed from the membership list and category at the end of January 2010. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

Sincerely, the Video Games WikiProject (delivery by xenobot 22:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Shawnc! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 942 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Chiang Hsiao-chang - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Chu Mu-yen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Liu Hailong - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:53, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:The.Way.Of.The.Dragon.1972.Bruce.Lee.flex.front.jpg[edit]

I have tagged File:The.Way.Of.The.Dragon.1972.Bruce.Lee.flex.front.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 00:25, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of contemporary classical double bass players[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of contemporary classical double bass players. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of contemporary classical double bass players. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:30, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar awarded![edit]

		The VG Barnstar
		Nice job improving the Video game collecting article. Thanks :) -- œ ^™ 11:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vancouver Wikipedia 10th Anniversary Meetup[edit]

The Interior cordially invites you to the Vancouver Wikipedia 10th Anniversary Meetup! It is being held at Benny's Bagels at 2505 W Broadway. Meetup will start at 6:30pm. Drop by for some Wikipedia-style conviviality and free gear! Feel free to forward this invitation to any Wikipedians who might be able to attend, and visit the discussion page to suggest activities. Hope to see you there and have a Happy 2011!

Nomination of Ganfyd for deletion[edit]

The article Ganfyd is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganfyd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Burhan Ahmed | Penny for your thoughts? 10:24, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Bernstein"[edit]

That part of the article by "Bernstein", just cites figures from Morton, page 57 (we generally agreed Morton was not a reliable source). Their argument is incoherent. Morton actually claims in the same passage that the Rothschilds had the biggest fortune ever. But he had no access to their records. It's not clear how his figure was adjusted for inflation or where Morton even got it from (he lists Rockefeller's fortune as significantly smaller, and he doesn't list his method or how he exchanged currencies), and it's not clear how the article further adjusted the figure for their argument.

I don't think that part of the article was actually written by Bernstein. It's only on their website. It seems to be a response to emails they received. They probably assigned a journalist or intern to write it in response to complaints the article got for forgetting to list certain historical figures. The photos they use even come from wikipedia. Niall Ferguson, working from family records, cites one member of the Rothschild family as having alone more than 5 times the fortune of Bill Gates. 82.26.0.138 (talk) 16:46, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apple Store news[edit]

Thanks for your feedback. I'm sorry I dismissed you out of hand; it's very common to see trolls who want nothing more than to tarnish Apple's reputation with the most trivial, ephemeral misstep, i.e. disrupt Wikipedia to make a point. They start with the criticism and look for a place to put it, rather than try to write the best article on the subject and use the information available, without a POV. That's what I meant in the previous post, but let me emphasize that that's just my personal heuristic; it's not any official policy or guideline that I know of. So my advice, and this is only one person's intuition, is to wait a week and see how it pans out. There is no deadline, and one of Wikipedia's strong points is to take the long-term view. As for posting on other pages, they're not going to see any additional traffic (and repeat posting is a tactic commonly used by POV-pushing trolls). Final piece of advice: chill out. It's impossible to get into serious trouble here without meaning to. HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 05:25, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're advice about separating my interpretation from the policy is well-taken. I meant to do that in the original post, but somehow I wrote "the rule of thumb" instead of "My own personal rule of thumb". An for disclosure, I also own an iPhone, and I understand and value your concern for not letting our biases get in the way. Thanks, HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 17:27, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:395px-Keratoconus1-800-edit.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:395px-Keratoconus1-800-edit.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:56, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Money manager for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Money manager is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Money manager until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pristinegoal (talk) 05:55, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Nn-warn2[edit]

Template:Nn-warn2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Yoenit (talk) 14:28, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

World Factoring Yearbook[edit]

I'm leaving this message as you're listed as a current participant of WikiProject Business. I was informed yesterday that the current World Factoring Yearbook (circa £150) is now free for download as an ebook. It's a matter of filling out this form. I'm not sure if you'll find this useful as a reliable source, but I thought I should let you know that it's freely available online. I apologise in advance if this doesn't interest you! All the best, The Cavalry (Message me) 15:13, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Page move Madame Chrysanthème[edit]

I intend to get your page move of Madame Chrysanthème to Madame Chrysanthème (opera) reverted at WP:Requested moves. I started a discussion on the relevant talk pages and at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Opera#Page move Madame Chrysanthème. Before I do so, you are encouraged to explain your rationale on any of those talk pages. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:46, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the kimura/gracie article?[edit]

Hi there,

So, first off I'd like to thank you for adding a whole bunch of content to wikipedia. I've looked over your history, and you seem like a really active member of the community. As someone that comes to wikipedia more often than not for a wide variety of topics, your efforts are NOT unappreciated :-)

Speaking in that regard, I noticed that you posted the following photo for the story of kimura vs. gracie:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Masahiko_Kimura_vs_Helio_Gracie_ude-garami.jpg

I think it's an awesome photo, and that story embodies so much of jiujitsu that I'd like to find out more about this newspaper. Do you have any idea where I could find a better quality image/more info on this newspaper article?

Thanks! -mpm453 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpm453 (talk • contribs) 05:40, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Westward Journey.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Westward Journey.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:37, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Rulon Gardner versus Hidehiko Yoshida at PRIDE Shockwave 2004.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rulon Gardner versus Hidehiko Yoshida at PRIDE Shockwave 2004.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:28, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Windows RT Edit War (sigh)[edit]

Please contribute to the poll on Talk:Windows RT. (You are being asked because you commented on Windows 8.) Tuntable (talk) 23:17, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Japanese martial arts terms[edit]

Category:Japanese martial arts terms, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 21:38, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Doogie Howser, M.D. does not have an edit summary. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 13:22, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jet set may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

under the pen name "Cholly Knickerbocker".<ref>"[[Oleg Cassini]] and his younger brother Igor (who became the Hearst newspaper gossip columnist "Cholly Knickerbocker" and coined the phrase "jet

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:51, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An RfC that you may be interested in...[edit]

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Chiang Hsiao-yung 1948.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Chiang Hsiao-yung 1948.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:39, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: McLaren 570S (March 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Oo7565 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at McLaren 570S instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:McLaren 570S and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Oo7565 (talk) 07:05, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Teahouse, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Oo7565 (talk) 07:05, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Best selling games listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Best selling games. Since you had some involvement with the Best selling games redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:49, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fist of Fury.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fist of Fury.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese army listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chinese army. Since you had some involvement with the Chinese army redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 10:02, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Shawnc. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Masahiko Kimura vs Helio Gracie ude-garami.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Masahiko Kimura vs Helio Gracie ude-garami.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Shawnc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Shawnc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:IMAGE listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:IMAGE. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:IMAGE redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. DannyS712 (talk) 01:53, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox tractor[edit]

Template:Infobox tractor has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox automobile. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:38, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox monster truck[edit]

Template:Infobox monster truck has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox automobile. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 22:36, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Correct horse battery staple" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Correct horse battery staple. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 8#Correct horse battery staple until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm (talk) 15:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Elexa" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Elexa. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 8#Elexa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Talk 03:57, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Commi-Nazi" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Commi-Nazi and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 9#Commi-Nazi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 08:09, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Environmental Quality Management[edit]

The article Environmental Quality Management has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Rather hard to check whether the company is notable as the name is rather general. Perhaps Americans will know better than me.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 18:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Owen and Mzee.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Owen and Mzee.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:45, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Joey Wat[edit]

Hi Shawnc. I have disclosed a conflict of interest on the Joey Wat page and requested that an impartial editor review a proposed expansion to the page that would also remove the promotional awards section. I saw that you had an interest in business and Asia (Joey Wat is known for modernizing fast food chains in Asia), so I was hoping you might take a look? Coreyhcooper (talk) 03:06, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]