User talk:ShereeEveritt

March 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Joyous!. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Peter Everitt, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joyous! Noise! 01:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Joyous!. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Peter Everitt seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Based on your edits and your username, it seems like you may be related to Peter Everitt? If so, you should read this page on editing with a conflict of interest. Joyous! Noise! 01:59, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Peter Everitt. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. _signed,SpringProof ^talk 02:05, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, ShereeEveritt. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:05, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Peter Everitt, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Peter Everitt was changed by ShereeEveritt (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.893351 on 2024-03-04T02:07:11+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for COI editing, including removal of sourced content, as you did at Peter Everitt. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Joyous! Noise! 02:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am his wife I know the facts ShereeEveritt (talk) 02:18, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's the problem with editing when you have a conflict of interest. Changing the article's contents because you are his wife and you "know the facts" doesn't comply with one of our main policies on Wikipedia: that of verifiability. From that page: Even if you are sure something is true, it must have been previously published in a reliable source before you can add it. I strongly encourage you to read the information about COI editing before your block expires. Joyous! Noise! 03:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you serious? That’s crazy and opens to defamation.

you have his birth place wrong you have his suburb where he grew up wrong you have a lot of things wrong.

how on earth can you say “reputable” when it’s gossip tabloids? ShereeEveritt (talk) 03:47, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And you block me for writing the truth. How???? ShereeEveritt (talk) 03:48, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

plus I didn’t change anything I ADDED all his acolades and wins, and I simply deleted the racist vilification which in this society is HIGHLY dangerous to him physically. It happened 29 years ago and there’s no place for Wikipedia to be promoting it PLUS half of it’s wrong!! ShereeEveritt (talk) 03:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You might wanna take that to the websites supporting the statement. Most statements in wikipedia is supported by a source, like a journal, news, etc... Basically, you will need to provide some sort of source to support the updates. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 04:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hilarious. Verified as fact by gossip tabloids and online negative trolls ShereeEveritt (talk) 05:39, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My advice is this: take your suggestions to the talk page of the article. In general, we request that people with a COI discuss their suggestions on the talk page, so others can weigh in on the changes. You can probably connect with some other editors who are a little more dialed into the topic than I am. I did remove the snarky comment about "...lack of discipline..." from the "Hawthorn career" section because it was unsourced. Joyous! Noise! 04:59, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There’s far more that’s unverified. How come all the positive charity work info has been deleted? How come all the positive facts were deleted and this other garbage put front and centre with a massive heading from 29 years ago. And now you want me to go on A public chat lol … a website that promotes gossip and trolls and doesn’t allow the actual people whose reputations are being hurt to write the truth. So I have to get a complete stranger who has zero integrity to give permission on their “opinion” on what’s fact??. No wonder people don’t pay Wikipedia. There are hundreds of interviews about my husband that you could gleen his “facts” from but someone deletes all that and is now promoting racism ….. ShereeEveritt (talk) 06:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sheree, I've unblocked your account. However, you still need to follow the established procedures for editing on Wikipedia. PLEASE read the page on conflict of interest editing. Continuing to make the sort of edits that you were adding earlier will probably result in your account being blocked again. Joyous! Noise! 18:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]