User talk:SherryReson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, SherryReson! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 23:54, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, SherryReson. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, SherryReson. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, SherryReson. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Media aggregation platform, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Over the top (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unaware of this. Would appreciate some help on other matters pertaining to editing wiki articles. SherryReson (talk) 22:59, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help[edit]

Thank you for your contact. I am interested in consulting with a more experienced editor. SherryReson (talk) 18:57, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What do you need assistance with? Praxidicae (talk) 19:40, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am working with an epidemiologist (MD/MPH) to bring several articles up to date. We have written a new article on Job Strain, which I want to insert in place of the existing article. I need help with inserting an image from a book (Dr Schnall is primary editor) and adding various footnotes. SherryReson (talk) 23:02, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is the content a summary of independent reliable sources? This sounds like original research.Praxidicae (talk) 23:23, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

I am working with an epidemiologist (MD/MPH) to bring several articles up to date. We have written a new article on Job Strain, which I want to insert in place of the existing article. I need help with inserting an image from a book (Dr Schnall is primary editor) and adding various footnotes. Multiple versions of this 50 yr old chart exist. Here's a link for one that appears in Dr. Schnall's book: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Karasek-job-strain-model_fig1_305111144

SherryReson (talk) 23:26, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This constitutes original research. You need to provide multiple sources. Please also continue in one section and see WP:COI. Praxidicae (talk) 23:33, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Praxidicae and I had to remove the text you added to the job stress article because it was copy-pasted from elsewhere in violation of copyright, or at least of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia requires its content to be freely licensed so that it can be modified and re-used for any purpose, including commercial purposes. I looked but could find no evidence of such a free license for this content that had previously been published elsewhere. However, even if evidence of a free license were provided, there would be further issues with the content that would likely make it unsuitable for Wikipedia. Wikipedia content should be a summary of what reliable published sources have reported on a subject, with individual aspects given due weight in proportion to their coverage in the sources. See WP:MEDRS for details on the sourcing requirements of medical topics. I expect Dr Schnall, as an expert in the field, is familiar with the literature and knows of good sources that can be used to improve the article. If the only source for a significant change to the article is your collaborator's own publication, that's probably not a good summary of the range of work on the topic and might even look as if the purpose were not to improve the article but to promote Dr Schnall's work. Thus it's best to use sources from unrelated third parties wherever available. Huon (talk) 02:32, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is very distressing. The document was pasted from a google doc that Dr. Schnall and I wrote over the past months in a belief that we were providing a public service. I took a nap and was coming in to add the following sources and found your note: 1 Ahola, K and Harkanan J. Job strain, burnout and depressive symptoms: A prospective study among dentists. J. of Affective Disorders 104(2007) 103-110 2. Effects of work burden, job strain and support on depressive symptoms and burnout among Japanese physicians Yasuaki Saijo 1 Shigeru Chiba 2 Et.al , Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2014;27(6):980–992 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13382-014-0324-2 1 Schnall PL, Landsbergis PA, Baker D. Job Strain and Cardiovascular Disease. Annual Review of Public Health; 15:381-411,1994.Schnall PL, Landsbergis PA, Schwartz JE, Pickering TG. Job Strain and Hypertension.2 Karasek RA, Theorell T. 1990. Healthy Work. New York: Basic Books A 2012 meta-analysis found a positive association between job strain and coronary heart disease risk.[1] A 2015 mefta-analysis found a similar association between job strain and stroke; the association was especially strong for women.[2] Job strain has also been found to increase the risk of higher blood pressure[3] but not obesity.[4] References[edit] ^ Jump up to: a b Kivimäki, Mika; Nyberg, Solja T; Batty, G David; Fransson, Eleonor I; Heikkilä, Katriina; Alfredsson, Lars; Bjorner, Jakob B; Borritz, Marianne; Burr, Hermann; Casini, Annalisa; Clays, Els; De Bacquer, Dirk; Dragano, Nico; Ferrie, Jane E; Geuskens, Goedele A; Goldberg, Marcel; Hamer, Mark; Hooftman, Wendela E; Houtman, Irene L; Joensuu, Matti; Jokela, Markus; Kittel, France; Knutsson, Anders; Koskenvuo, Markku; Koskinen, Aki; Kouvonen, Anne; Kumari, Meena; Madsen, Ida EH; Marmot, Michael G; Nielsen, Martin L; Nordin, Maria; Oksanen, Tuula; Pentti, Jaana; Rugulies, Reiner; Salo, Paula; Siegrist, Johannes; Singh-Manoux, Archana; Suominen, Sakari B; Väänänen, Ari; Vahtera, Jussi; Virtanen, Marianna; Westerholm, Peter JM; Westerlund, Hugo; Zins, Marie; Steptoe, Andrew; Theorell, Töres (October 2012). "Job strain as a risk factor for coronary heart disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data". The Lancet. 380 (9852): 1491–1497. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60994-5. PMC 3486012. PMID 22981903. ^ Huang, Y; Xu, S; Hua, J; Zhu, D; Liu, C; Hu, Y; Liu, T; Xu, D (10 November 2015). "Association between job strain and risk of incident stroke: A meta-analysis". Neurology. 85 (19): 1648–54. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002098. PMID 26468409. ^ Landsbergis, Paul A.; Dobson, Marnie; Koutsouras, George; Schnall, Peter (March 2013). "Job Strain and Ambulatory Blood Pressure: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review". American Journal of Public Health. 103 (3): e61–e71. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.301153. PMC 3673518. PMID 23327240. ^ Kivimäki, M; Singh-Manoux, A; Nyberg, S; Jokela, M; Virtanen, M (November 2015). "Job strain and risk of obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies". International Journal of Obesity. 39 (11): 1597–600. doi:10.1038/ijo.2015.103. PMC 4579559. PMID 26041697. 🌈 I'll share your communication with him. May we communicate via email?SherryReson (talk) 23:02, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:SherryReson[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:SherryReson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://unhealthywork.org/workplace-stressors/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:47, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CAPTAIN RAJU: Hi, I was reviewing this. According to section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, "Only if the history is unsalvageably corrupted should it be deleted in its entirety; earlier versions without infringement should be retained" and "the article or the appropriate section should be blanked with {{subst:Copyvio|url=insert URL here}}, and the page should be listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems." According to WP:DCV, "Revision deletion should then be requested by placing {{copyvio-revdel}} on the article page or directly contacting an administrator on their talk page."
I appreciate the work you do in excising COPYVIO. However, in this case things went beyond removing just the versions that had a copyright violation.
Do you have an administrator who you work with who can restore the versions previous to the COPYVIO? If you would please help correct this situation, it would be great. SherryReson thinks that 2019-06-01 predates any COPYVIO.
Peaceray (talk) 05:47, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Anthony Appleyard: Hi, thank you for all the work you do as an administrator. Please read my message to CAPTAIN RAJU. In this case as per section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, "Only if the history is unsalvageably corrupted should it be deleted in its entirety; earlier versions without infringement should be retained" and "the article or the appropriate section should be blanked with {{subst:Copyvio|url=insert URL here}}, and the page should be listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems." According to WP:DCV, "Revision deletion should then be requested by placing {{copyvio-revdel}} on the article page or directly contacting an administrator on their talk page."
According to SherryReson, the copyvio only occurred sometime after 2019-06-01. When you deleted SherryReson's page, you deleted all the non-copyvio versions as well. Would you please restore the non-problematic versions?
Thanks, Peaceray (talk) 03:50, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see that the owner and I did not follow Wiki protocol and I will bring procedures for Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to the attention of the owner of the sites in question. A number of people have weighed in and/or acted. Who should I be dealing with? SherryReson (talk) 06:26, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (writing and adding references now. will complete in 30 min. There is no infringement) --SherryReson (talk) 18:13, 5 December 2019 (UTC) There is no copyright infringement. The cited web pages are owned by Dr. Peter Schnall, Director and Board President of Center for Social Epidemiology and related sites, who tells me there is no applicable copyright law for his sites. I have written to PeaceRay, who, years ago, welcomed me to Wiki. You have my attention; I'm hoping you'll slow down. There are still a handful of references to be added but we will wait for this issue to be resolved. SherryReson (talk) 18:13, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (I am working with Peter Schnall, MD, MPH, who owns unhealthywork.org, and the related websites. This is original work with some language posted in that website. Rather than editing the existing wiki page, we thought it more useful to create a new version of the page with stronger third party references) --SherryReson (talk) 18:20, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information[edit]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SherryReson&oldid=990336502"