User talk:Shubhamghodke3904

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Shubham Ghodke[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Shubham Ghodke, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CptViraj (📧) 12:16, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Shubhamghodke3904, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Manoj Patil have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:38, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! PATH SLOPU 13:36, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Come play the Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

The
Adventure
The Wikipedia Adventure guide

Hi Shubhamghodke3904!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot

October 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm The Mirror Cracked. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:Onel5969 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 14:29, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Sarvesh Amte[edit]

Hello, Shubhamghodke3904,

Thank you for creating Sarvesh Amte.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please try to use a neutral language in the article

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Path slopu}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PATH SLOPU 14:51, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me fixing this[edit]

@Path slopu: Dear please help me fixing this, (The neutrality of this article is disputed) or else tell me how can i fix this as i am new to Wikipedia. Thanks! {u|Shubhamghodke3904}15:16, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi greetings, please read this page--Neutral Point of View policy. I am strongly recommending you to participate in Wikipedia adventure- a tutorial which help you to how to edit Wikipedia. Please sign the posts with ~~~~. Regards.--PATH SLOPU 15:24, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi Shubhamghodke3904! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 15:25, Tuesday, October 15, 2019 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Invitation[edit]

PATH SLOPU 04:25, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly review this page Dhanush Babu[edit]

@Path slopu: Dear admin please help me with this i want this page to be reviewed as this person has achieved a good name in India, so please look forward and review this page , Thanks...15:43, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dhanush Babu[edit]

Please see WP:Citation needed. Do not remove citation needed tags unless you can provide sources for the claims in question. GUYWAN ( t · c ) 21:09, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Thanks for looking into it..[edit]

@Guywan: dear user, as I am new on Wikipedia I have less knowledge about some of the point, so for any mistake I have done, looking kindly forgive me. I will add some sources to points where you want... noisyboy 03:07, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly review this page Dhanush Babu[edit]

@Path slopu: Please review this page thanks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhanush_Babu. noisyboy 08:58, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Fastest Skater of India[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Fastest Skater of India. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Dhanush Babu. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Dhanush Babu. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Fram (talk) 11:03, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 16:53, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for writing[edit]

@CAPTAIN MEDUSA: Thanks for writing on my talk page, i need a another help, can you please help scraping this page for verification purpose, because its talking a long time for getting verified.

Please review this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhanush_Babu.

Thanks. --05:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)Shubhamghodke3904

December 2019[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia talk:Teahouse, appears to have been inappropriate, and has been reverted. Please feel free to use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Your edit was not relevant to that page. Please read the notice at the top of Wikipedia talk:Teahouse. David Biddulph (talk) 09:57, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, maybe in hurry I forgot to mention my signature.. (Shubham Ghodke) 14:26, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcoming new users[edit]

Thanks for welcoming new users but please be sure to review their edits first before thanking as you did here. This editor has only vandalized the NLE Choppa article. Robvanvee 18:14, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Robvanvee I am sorry this wont happen again. i will take care of it, i want to be a reviewer please help me..(Shubham Ghodke) 18:20, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, just bringing it to your attention. A reviewer of what? Robvanvee 18:37, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
i want to have Curation Toolbar want to i want to participate in WikiProject Articles for creation.(Shubham Ghodke) 18:40, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Then perhaps you should look here. Robvanvee 18:46, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moving drafts to mainspace[edit]

Please don't take it upon yourself to move drafts to mainspace, as you did with Basketball IQ. The AFC process has a purpose, which you're circumventing. Basketball IQ only has a single primary source, thus questionable notability. In the move, you failed to clean up AFC templates and the cross-namespace redirect. Please focus on helpful editing of existing articles, and learn more about the policies and processes. You can also review the "How to get involved" section for the AFC WikiProject and read through all of the links to become familiar with the article reviewing process while you accumulate enough edits to meet the reviewer requirements. Schazjmd (talk) 19:27, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Schazjmd okay i will take care of it, I wont do this mistake again thanks for your help. (Shubham Ghodke) 19:32, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Shubhamghodke3904, don't do anything more to Basketball IQ, I'm going to get it moved back over the redirect. Schazjmd (talk) 19:33, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
SchazjmdYes Please do it, i am sorry.(Shubham Ghodke) 19:34, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year![edit]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello Shubhamghodke3904, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020.
Happy editing,
PATH SLOPU 14:41, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

--PATH SLOPU 14:41, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Path slopu: This means a lot. (Shubham Ghodke) 18:08, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dhanush Babu Edits[edit]

Hi @Shubhamghodke3904:

I saw that you recently reverted my series of copy-edits to your article Dhanush Babu without providing an edit summary. As a copy-edit was requested on the GOCE page, I was curious as to why the edits, which were focused on reducing repetition and improving organization, along with general grammar, were reverted? If the edits were unsatisfactory or you would like another copy-edit, please let me know and I'd be more than happy to give this another go with any parameters you specify. Yerkes-Dodson (talk) 19:45, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yerkes-Dodson: Sorry i that i didn't inform you about reverting the edit, please dont change the edit now. (Shubham Ghodke) 20:53, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/terminator[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/terminator, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 20:04, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Rayudu Arun Kumar[edit]

Hello, Shubhamghodke3904,

Thank you for creating Rayudu Arun Kumar.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please try to fix the issues mentioned in the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Path slopu}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PATH SLOPU 09:11, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Path slopu: Dear please tell somebody to fix this page as i am not able to identify it. thanks (Shubham Ghodke) 15:46, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kinita Kadakia Patel[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kinita Kadakia Patel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 01:20, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning[edit]

I see that you have been repeatedly cautioned in regards to creation of promotional and otherwise inappropriate articles. The above article, Kinita Kadakia Patel, was entirely unacceptable promotional fluff. Please consider this your final warning that should you once again create an inappropriate article, you are likely to be blocked from editing. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:04, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kinita Kadakia Patel[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Kinita Kadakia Patel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 10:53, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, Shubhamghodke3904. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 17:11, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kinita Kadakia Patel[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Kinita Kadakia Patel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. bonadea contributions talk 18:36, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have added more promotional content since the previous speedy deletion tag was removed, and since you have an obvious conflict of interest which you have not addressed, it is in the best interest of the encyclopaedia to simply have the page deleted. --bonadea contributions talk 18:39, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Seraphimblade Talk to me 18:43, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please Unblock me[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shubhamghodke3904 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know what is leading the page like advertising so I am getting blocked, kindly unblock me I was just editing page was and was removing unwanted things from the page and was writing it in a natural way and that article is still in the draft version I am working on it. (Shubham Ghodke) 18:50, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What I'm seeing, on reviewing your edits, is one of two things: an editor who is not sufficiently competent to edit here, or a paid editor going to considerable lengths to avoid disclosure. Either is grounds for leaving the block in place. Yunshui 雲水 08:19, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is your association with Kinita Kadakia Patel? 331dot (talk) 19:58, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear 331dot i am connected with her though social media, and please tell me what is commercial things that i included in the article i understand while writing we make some mistakes but this doesnt mean you people will block me like this from editing this is such a insulting thing for me, i have been editing since long time. (Shubham Ghodke) 03:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Here's the primary issue. I already warned you above that the article was inappropriately promotional. (That's the whole thing, by the way, not just a sentence or two.) When we discussed it on my talk page, I told you some specific examples of the problem.[1] When you wrote your draft, you did several of those very same things again. So, I have to conclude that either you're not able to understand how to write neutrally, even when given explicit instructions, or that you have some incentive not to do so. In either case, you will not be permitted to continue editing about Patel. If you would like to edit other things, and will commit to both making no further edits about Patel whatsoever and to carefully ensuring you understand our neutrality requirements before making future edits, I am willing to consider an unblock. Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:42, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I will stop writing about Patel kindly unblock me thats my humblke request. (Shubham Ghodke) 04:59, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And, the rest? If you just go on to write in the same way about something else, that's no good either. Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:22, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A related question: What is your connection to Rayudu Arun Kumar? The article you created about him is almost as promotional as the draft about Patel and included a lot of details that were not in any source (I removed some of that yesterday but a lot of advertising language remains). You also claim, as you did with Patel and several other people you created articles about, to have taken pictures of him yourself. A bunch of photos you uploaded to Commons have been removed for that reason – I tagged two of them as copyright violations but I see that several others were also deleted. How many of the articles and drafts you have created are about people you are in contact with? --bonadea contributions talk 06:44, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Let me clear one thing i dont know anyone personally, the things is i reachout using social media just to get there orignial pictures, and about rayudu arun kumar i asked him his pictures he sent on my email then i edited it in photoshop for using it on wikipedia just not to get any strike. tahts it, and about what i have writen its already reviewed and if there is problem with the article its free to be editted anyone can fix it i dont have any objection. Thanks (Shubham Ghodke) 08:45, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, then you're also falsifying the origin of those photos. "Own work" means that you were the photographer, not that you contacted someone on social media and got a photo. And it's not enough to get permission for "use on Wikipedia", the images must be released, by the photographer, under a free license, meaning that anyone is free to use them for any purpose. Do they understand that they would be doing that, and was it the photographer (or other copyright holder) who agreed to it? Regardless, however, false authorship attribution is not acceptable; you can't say "Own work" if it wasn't. The author is the name of the photographer, and using a false claim of "Own work" isn't acceptable there either. Seraphimblade Talk to me 22:36, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, i will give the orignal credit to the orignal photographer under copyright holder. I am not falsing anything just the thing is i had to give the copyright unfortunetly i gave my name as author under free licence. (Shubham Ghodke) 03:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Manoj Jaat for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manoj Jaat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manoj Jaat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sanyam.wikime (talk) 05:47, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Manoj Patil for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manoj Patil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manoj Patil until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 18:42, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge[edit]

WikiProject India Hello Shubhamghodke3904. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing!
If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by: 
{{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}}

Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stephen Paul Kilari[edit]

Hello, Shubhamghodke3904. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stephen Paul Kilari".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shubhamghodke3904&oldid=990664828"