Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mach61 was:
Interviews do not establish notability. Discogs and Encyclopedia Metallum are user generated, and thus unusable as sources
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shylmagoghnar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hey there! Thank you for reviewing my draft. I have some questions about your declination comment before I adjust the article:
1.About "Discogs and Encyclopedia Metallum are user generated, and thus unusable as sources". Noted, I was uncertain about that. I've tried to find out how editors of other bands have done this, but from what I can see they oftentimes don't refer to anything when listing a band's body of work. So can I assume that if I simply remove these references, the problem is solved?
Otherwise, may I ask what is considered a reliable source for existing musical works on Wiki? From what I can see, articles usually quote either Discogs or MusicBrainz, which are both user generated as far as I'm aware. I see AllMusic often, but that one is already referenced here.
2.About: "interviews do not establish notability":
I did not refer to them to establish notability. This is already being done by citing publications directly discussing the band's work (though I could add more of those if that is the issue).
The interviews are there as citation to prove that the band has made statements about the things in the Wiki article. I've looked at "Good articles on Wikipedia" and articles about music on there do that as well, so I don't understand why or how this needs to be changed before resubmission?
Hello, Shyrtokae!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mach61 (talk) 23:28, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cambalachero was:
Only of the 3 albums was released by Napalm Records, the others were independent. May be notable when the next album is released.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shylmagoghnar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
I think you intended to write "only 1 of the 3 albums" right? If so, this is incorrect. Two of three were released by Napalm Records, which is indicated in the article, and the first independent one was rereleased on vinyl several times by Napalm Records as well (not indicated in the article because I couldn't find an independent source on that).
I think you intended to write "only 1 of the 3 albums" right? If so, this is incorrect. Two of three were released by Napalm Records, which is indicated in the article, and the first independent one was rereleased on vinyl several times by Napalm Records as well (not indicated in the article because I couldn't find an independent source on that).
