User talk:Sidbill60

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sebastien Stella (January 6)[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sebastien Stella.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Anup Mehra ^✈ 10:35, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Sidbill60, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Anup Mehra ^✈ 16:36, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What would make this subject more "notable"?[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Sebastien Stella is one of the foremost specialty and aerial choreographers in the world. Though not a household name, in America, he has played a crucial role in boosting the careers of such performers as Pink and Katy Perry with his work. The largest French language publication in the US named him one of the top French celebrities living here. He is a juror on a popular French talent competition show along the lines of The X Factor. All of that would seem to make him a notable figure by Wikipedia's standards. I understand Wikipedia's request for more citable sources attesting to his notability, but would welcome advice/comments on like likelihood of Stella passing the notability test with those citations. Thanks. Sidbill60 (talk) 16:53, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You have a new message at Anupmehra's talk page. Anup Mehra ^✈ 17:18, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) That looks promising, but WP:Notability in Wikipedia's sense does not depend on assertions like "one of the foremost... " or accounts of what he has done, but has to be demonstrated by references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought him significant enough to write substantial comment about? See also WP:Notability (summary).

That replaces the subjective question "Do we think he is important or significant?" with the more objective one "Is there evidence that people not connected with him think him important or significant?" The key is, independent references. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:24, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New Message[edit]

Hello. You have a new message at Anupmehra's talk page. Anup Mehra ^✈ 22:12, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Hello. You have a new message at Anupmehra's talk page. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 21:37, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You have a new message at Anupmehra's talk page. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 00:32, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Sebastien Stella was accepted[edit]

Sebastien Stella, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Anupmehra -Let's talk! 12:15, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox/Rodrigo Amado (June 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

needs independent sources and photograph removing

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sidbill60/sandbox/Rodrigo Amado and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Sidbill60/sandbox/Rodrigo Amado, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:33, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sidbill60! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:33, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Sidbill60/sandbox/Rodrigo Amado has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Sidbill60/sandbox/Rodrigo Amado. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:05, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rodrigo Amado[edit]

Hello, Sidbill60. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rodrigo Amado, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]