User talk:Silicate minerals

April 2013[edit]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Richard B. Handler ‎ has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Keri (talk) 22:02, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GroundRisk. Thank you. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:24, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Richard B. Handler, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Keri (talk) 15:58, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Richard B. Handler, you may be blocked from editing. Keri (talk) 15:58, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Richard B. Handler has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Keri (talk) 15:59, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean......................[edit]

by this? What wasn't you? I also find it very odd that you're commenting on a banned users page, the user that I banned--5 albert square (talk) 16:30, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In the light of your recent quite dubious editing history, I feel that a good, sensible and prompt answer to this question is the only way by which you can avoid a preventative block.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:58, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:23, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]