User talk:Simmons1998

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Simmons1998! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Doug Weller talk 11:47, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

May 2022[edit]

Information icon Hi Simmons1998! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at List of explorers that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 00:53, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced material[edit]

You called Henry I Sinclair, Earl of Orkney an explorer and added him to List of explorers but there is no reliable evidence that he was - there are a lot of legends about him but no reliable sources which is why his article only calls him a legendary explorer. Then you added text saying he subdued the Faroe Islands which again is not correct, which is why Faro Islands also doesn't mention it. Please read WP:VERIFY and WP:RS. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 11:52, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also please stop adding stuff to Marco Polo's article, within the context of the article, a descendant without a separate article is not notable, and with an article he probably still would not fit in. --Tone 11:35, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, this has been raised at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard and I can lend you a hand with finding better sources if you like. You can answer here to say what articles you are working on. Thanks. Itsmejudith (talk) 19:07, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And now you've started to edit war[edit]

You've been reverted twice for calling the fringe theories about Sinclair Legends. They clearly are not. Legend says "A legend is a genre of folklore that consists of a narrative featuring human actions, believed or perceived, both by teller and listeners, to have taken place in human history. Narratives in this genre may demonstrate human values, and possess certain qualities that give the tale verisimilitude. Legend, for its active and passive participants may include miracles. Legends may be transformed over time to keep them fresh and vital." How does that apply to the Sinclair stories? Doug Weller talk 12:30, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An edit war? I've studied Sinclair family for a long time and their is NO evidence that conclusively identifies Henry as "Zichmni" from the Zeno Narrative. There is no mention of him even once. It is all wild speculation and here say and thus making it folklore. It is a desperate attempt to claim a pre Columbian voyage and nothing more. Simmons1998 (talk) 14:33, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, no evidence. But it doesn't fit the definitions of folklore, legend or myth. That's the issue I'm talking about. Doug Weller talk 14:54, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Edit warring is persistently restoring your preferred version of an article despite disagreement from others. The edit history on Henry I Sinclair, Earl of Orkney shows that you upon being reverted changing "Fringe theories" to "Legends" in your next edit did the exact same thing, with no edit summary either. Though minor, that is still edit warring. The better thing to do in that scenario is to raise the issue on the talk page and discuss with the other editors, because trying to brute force your changes through is more likely to get you blocked than the article being changed. See WP:EDITWAR for more info. TylerBurden (talk) 08:26, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You added an unsourced date of birth[edit]

Yes, it is used elsewhere. But no evidence that it’s well known. Please read Wikipedia:BLPRIVACY and if you want to be helpful remove it completely from the article. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 14:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited First Families of Virginia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norvell. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Gano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minister.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page William Hubbel Price, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:21, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Schazjmd. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Audie Murphy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please explain how a novel by Trollope first published in 1869 provides verification of someone joining the Army in 2008. Schazjmd (talk) 15:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It appears I made the mistake. Here is the correct source for Audie Murphy's nephew. graduate_learns_about_uncles_legacy_in_bct Simmons1998 (talk) 20:12, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think you mean this Army.mil article. It's a source for the content, but I don't really think a distant relative joining the Army is significant enough to mention. You can suggest it at Talk:Audie Murphy and see what other editors think, they might disagree with me.
Part of your edit was not even supported by that source. You wrote Clinton's sergeant nicknamed him "Audie" after his great- great uncle., however the source says "Sometimes, the drill sergeants, when I do something wrong say, 'Come on Audie," he said. Hardly the same thing. Schazjmd (talk) 20:33, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I felt it was more of a family legacy and worth mentioning for Audie Murphy's military service. If you dont think its worth mentioning, I wont debate any further. Simmons1998 (talk) 20:51, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's only my opinion that it isn't worth mentioning. If you'd like additional opinions, post the question on the article's talk page with the source cited and see what other editors think. I won't respond there at all so as not to try to sway the discussion. Schazjmd (talk) 21:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

...Wait, I've been presuming you've been objecting to the CROP of Theodore Roosevelt's lead image. Is this something to do with the bug in mobile Wikipedia that means certain images get left-aligned on mobile if they're using CSS image crop? Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 08:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Right. That's a bug on CSS image crop. I've put in a fix for it. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 09:55, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for fixing the bug. Simmons1998 (talk) 17:48, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I got upset there: A lot of editors, including me, don't use mobile view, and we had just finished a long discussion about the image on the page that I thought you were restarting, when I instead just couldn't see the thing you objected to. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 03:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This was a massive miss understanding. I honestly thought you were just a vandle trying to alter photos. Lets let by gones be by gones. Simmons1998 (talk) 03:57, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page William Hubbel Price, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Hubbel Price, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Private.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]