User talk:Simply south/July 2013 to 2014 archive

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


The Signpost: 31 July 2013

The Signpost: 07 August 2013

August '13

Hi there, forgive me for asking, but I haven't seen any Metropolitan newsletters come out in a while. Any particular reason for it? Just being nosy really. --Tom... the magic... TomatoTalk 13:50, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Filton Bank

I have never, ever, seen Filton Bank referred to as "the Filton Bank Line". -mattbuck (Talk) 19:03, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Nor me. I've started a thread at Talk:Filton Bank Line#Name. --Redrose64 (talk) 06:22, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Metro

Thanks mate. Tom... the magic... TomatoTalk 09:08, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 August 2013

Thank you

.... for correcting the location info about Chelsea and Fulham railway station. I had overlooked that detail. I musty confess I'd never heard of Walham Green but you learn something every day. Cnbrb (talk) 11:19, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 August 2013

The Signpost: 28 August 2013

Hamilton Square

Hi, I've noticed you changed H Sq to Birkenhead HSq as this is the official name. I checked on Merseyrail here and it still records it as Hamilton Square. Just thought i'd check with you? Babydoll9799 (talk) 22:09, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

50th edition

For anyone reading, here is the 50th edition. I can only apologise this is so late as a lot of work came up but it is still no excuse so again I will apologise. Inside includes everything since the last edition as usual. Enjoy. Simply south...... fighting ovens for just 7 years 22:24, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 September 2013

The Signpost: 11 September 2013

The Signpost: 18 September 2013

The Signpost: 25 September 2013

RE: Acton Town and other areas

I see, thank you for explaining this to me, I guess you learn something new everyday. However, the coordinates I have placed for North Acton were just south of Harlesden; Harlesden is in the London Borough of Brent. Nomodomolee (talk) 18:43, 1 October 2013 (UTC)Nomodomolee.

The Signpost: 02 October 2013

Oct Metro

I will also happily accept requests for the gallery (if not, images will be selected from archives elsewhere). Again I will also remind people that if they ever want to try doing a future month's issue, feel free to with your own style etc or even just stick to the current format. Don't hesitate to contact me for the resources of things to include in this newsletter. Otherwise, enjoy! Simply south...... cooking letters for just 7 years 23:40, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 October 2013

Template editor

Hi, I saw that you just received the protected template editor userright. Are there any full protected templates that you'd like to edit? Let me know and I'll downgrade the protection so you can do so. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:20, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 October 2013

The Signpost: 23 October 2013

The Signpost: 30 October 2013

Category:Tate structures

Category:Tate structures, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust The Homunculus 13:57, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 November 2013

Happy Editing

Hello Simply south, Eduemoni has given you a shining smiling star! You see, these things promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the Shining Smiling Star whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy! Eduemoni↑talk↓ 13:15, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 November 2013

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Croxley Rail Link, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Three Rivers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 November 2013

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hypnos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morpheus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

December edition

Please feel free to suggest any changes or add any requests such as images for the gallery. If you also want to have a try for the new year's edition or any future editions, please do not hesitate to ask. Simply south...... cooking letters for just 7 years 21:32, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 December 2013

The Signpost: 11 December 2013

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HP Cloud Services, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monitoring (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2013

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

--


The Signpost: 25 December 2013

MOTD's Barnstar 2013

The MOTD Barnstar
We at Motto of the Day (MOTD) would like to thank you for your participation and contributions to MOTD during 2013. We hope to see you around at MOTD next year. Happy 2014!!! –pjoef (talkcontribs) 15:37, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 January 2014

The Signpost: 08 January 2014

The Signpost: 15 January 2014

The Signpost: 22 January 2014

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited London Victoria station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Block train.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 February 2014

DYK nomination of Dawlish Avoiding Line

Hello! Your submission of Dawlish Avoiding Line at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:10, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

The article was edited, but the issues aren't yet addressed. Please revisit it! --Orlady (talk) 18:51, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  • It's been over a week since Orlady posted the above, but you haven't responded. I'm marking the nomination for closure as unsuccessful; if you hurry, you might be able to chime in and reactivate it before the final rejection takes place. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:07, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you

February 2014 North American winter storm is better, and it's probably not the last name.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 21:13, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Pensford Viaduct

Thanks for your comment at Template:Did you know nominations/Pensford Viaduct. The proposed sale was in 1984 (according to This source) which I've added to the article. Do you think the year needs to be in the hook as well? Is there anything else you think is needed?— Rod talk 09:06, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks I've added that ref as well (it was previously being used for other claims in the article).— Rod talk 18:27, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
On re reading your message ... I don't have any further details of publication for the newspaper clipping but reading the last line where it says "Write and tell the Gazette your views" I guess this relates to the Chew Valley Gazette and as it uses the current tense "is up for sale" I would guess it was published in 1984. I knew the previous editor & have been "introduced" to the current editor so could email them to ask them to check their archive if you think it is worth it?— Rod talk 20:33, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 February 2014

The Signpost: 26 February 2014

(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014

The Signpost: 12 March 2014

The Signpost: 19 March 2014

The Signpost: 26 March 2014

The Signpost: 02 April 2014

The Signpost: 09 April 2014

The Signpost: 23 April 2014

Hi Simply south. I think that the formal name for the new station will be "James Cook University Hospital" rather than just "James Cook". Although the Esk Valley Railway site calls it "James Cook" in the blog post you referred to, I think this is just shorthand rather than the official name (in the same way as you might use "New Street" as shorthand for the Birmingham New Street.

The Network Rail planning documents show the names as JCUH - see http://edrms.middlesbrough.gov.uk/AnitePublicDocs/03804327.pdf as does the e-NRT http://www.networkrail.co.uk/browse%20documents/eNRT/Dec13/Stations_Index_and_Table_Numbers.pdf (page 16). (Crookesmoor talk) 16:19, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

  • Sorry, I've corrected the signature. However, if you search on www.nationalrail.co.uk for journeys from Middlesbrough to Nunthorpe from 18 May, it shows the full JCUH name. Crookesmoor (talk) 16:39, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Motto of the Day Help Request April 2014

Motto of the Day (WP:MOTD) is in a state of emergency and really needs your help! There are not enough editors who are reviewing or nominating mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review, and this probably means that you will notice a red link or “This space for rent” as our mottos for the next weeks and months.

Please take a moment to review the nominations and nominate your own new mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review and Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/'Specials. Any help would be appreciated! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

This message has been sent by pjoef on behalf of Motto of the Day to all editors of the English Wikipedia who are showing MOTD's templates on their pages, and to all the participants to MOTD: (page, template, and category).

The Signpost: 30 April 2014

The Signpost: 07 May 2014

The Signpost: 14 May 2014

The Signpost: 21 May 2014

The article Methil (name) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 20:21, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 May 2014

The Signpost: 04 June 2014

The Signpost: 11 June 2014

The Signpost: 18 June 2014

Moving articles

It is adviseable not to move articles without first discussing the proposal on the article talk page and seeking consensus for the move. This is particularly important when the existing name has been accepted by the community for some time. You most certainly should not have unilaterally moved the article again once someone objected (WP:BRD).

In the case of two of the articles, Northeast America blackout of 2003 and Northeast America blackout of 1965, the article names have already been the subject of debate and the current names were decided upon by consensus. You therefore had no right to change them without seeking further consensus. In my view: your revised article names do not meet the requirement for article naming as the revised names are not something that anyone looking for information on the subject are likely to use as a search key (See WP:TITLE for more).

Your final transgression was to move the above two articles twice in succession. This is strict no no, because it completely screws up the ability to easily undo the damage because it is not possible to do a double move back. It has taken me over half an hour to restore things back to the accepted version. I B Wright (talk) 13:07, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

UPDATE: I have now got all 3 articles move protected so if you wish to continue with this you will have to propose it on the talk page. I B Wright (talk) 15:48, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 June 2014

The Signpost: 02 July 2014

As you are obviously unaware

There is no point adding 'noredirect' to links to other articles (whether they exist or not). 'noredirect' has no actual functionality. DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 14:54, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Not correct. It doesn't change a thing. DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 12:40, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
STOP PRESS: In this context it does have an effect but only because redirect pages have been inadvertently created. Normally, with a proposed article move, the proposed name change is to a location that does not exist and consequently [[No article here]] and {{noredirect|No article here}} do exactly the same thing as you can try for yourself with No article here and No article here. DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 12:55, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 July 2014

The Signpost: 16 July 2014

The Signpost: 23 July 2014