User talk:Sincereduck
Sincereduck, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi Sincereduck! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC) |
May 2021[edit]
Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 04:35, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Rummskartoffel. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Brandon Rogers (YouTuber), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The source you provided for the claim you added, Wikia, is not considered reliable, because it consists almost completely of user-generated content. – Rummskartoffel (talk • contribs) 21:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Stephen Fry, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:04, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of LGBT atheists[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on LGBT atheists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ColinBear (talk) 18:59, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Edit summaries please :)[edit]
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! PerpetuityGrat (talk) 21:42, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
June 2021[edit]
Hello, I'm Elizium23. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jack Chick, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Elizium23 (talk) 19:59, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to Helluva Boss, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. SWinxy (talk) 20:45, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 8[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Teen Titans: Trouble in Tokyo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Action. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
August 2021[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Doom Patrol (TV series), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — YoungForever(talk) 21:40, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Category:Television series critical of religion has been nominated for deletion[edit]
Category:Television series critical of religion has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:58, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello Evergreen. May I ask why you think my category page should be deleted? If there is a specific problem, can you explain? Thank you. Sincereduck (talk) 20:18, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December 2021[edit]
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Event Horizon (film), please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:57, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
January 2022[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Mulan (1998 film), you may be blocked from editing. Categories must be supported by sourced article content Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:40, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to The Last Stand (2013 film), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 29[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Entergalactic (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musical.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
April 2022[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Piranha (1978 film), you may be blocked from editing. You've been warned multiple times about not supporting your edits with sources, including adding categories that aren't supported by an article's existing content. You need to change this behavior or you will likely be blocked from editing in the future. DonIago (talk) 20:15, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- 2 months later and the user continues to add incorrect categories to articles without any edit summary. It takes time to undo these... Dan Carkner (talk) 20:40, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
August 2022[edit]
Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 05:01, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
November 2022[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at The Legend of Vox Machina, you may be blocked from editing. Sariel Xilo (talk) 23:04, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Your edit to Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Sariel Xilo (talk) 23:04, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Please don't add audience scores[edit]
See Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 13:26, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Protagonist/antagonist[edit]
Hi, I'm leaving a message here because you do not seem to have noticed the multiple edit summaries in which I've addressed this topic. Per WP:ANTAGONIST: Interpretations in the form of labels (e.g. protagonist, antagonist, villain, main character) should be avoided. A well-written plot summary should convey such roles.
Please stop restoring this information to articles. Thanks.— TAnthonyTalk 15:22, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
March 2023[edit]
Hello, I'm CastJared. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Last of Us (TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CastJared (talk) 12:30, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
April 2023[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at D-Tox, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 03:16, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 23[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liam Payne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Midlands.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
June 2023[edit]
Hello, I'm CastJared. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Last of Us (TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CastJared (talk) 19:29, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Cordless Larry (talk) 07:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
July 2023[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at I Love You Phillip Morris, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:08, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
August 2023[edit]
Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Josh Keaton, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 18:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hello Waxworker, yes you made a mistake. All the casting is in the Invincible season 2 trailer, INCLUDING Josh Keaton. Also, can you name one celebrity page where all their roles are sourced? Sincereduck (talk) 23:12, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
September 2023[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Zehra Fazal, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 07:43, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)