User talk:Sirsebastian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Sirsebastian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as 2012 Photon Age, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Becky Sayles (talk) 11:00, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "2012 Photon Age"[edit]

A page you created, 2012 Photon Age, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Becky Sayles (talk) 11:00, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

Your addition to 2012 Photon Age has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Wyatt Riot (talk) 14:11, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Photonage.jpg[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Photonage.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.photonage.com. As a copyright violation, File:Photonage.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Photonage.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Wyatt Riot (talk) 14:19, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't understand what do ı have to do exactly..? there can't be any copyright problem, because we made all these stuff.

(I've moved your question down - it's simplest if new bits are added to the bottom of a talk page)
It's all very well to say that you "made all this stuff", but we have no way to know that someone at the end of a wire is who he says he is, and we have to be very careful about copyright. The way to release material to Wikipedia is described at WP:Donating copyrighted materials.
But it is probably not worth doing that, because there is no indication that your game is notable enough to have an article. Notability, for Wikipedia's purposes, is not a matter of opinion but must be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people unconnected with the subject thought it interesting and important enough to write substantial comment about? An encyclopedia is not here to help promote new things.
Also, if it's your own invention, in writing about it you have a WP:Conflict of interest. You should really wait until your game takes off, there is independent comment about it like reviews, and some fan independently decides to write an article. See WP:SCRABBLE. JohnCD (talk) 11:32, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]