User talk:SkullKnight1189284

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, SkullKnight1189284! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:31, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:31, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You’re doing a great job editing, man. Keep it up! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anewkindofeditor (talkcontribs) 05:22, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019[edit]

Hello, SkullKnight1189284, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as AndInFirstPlace (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:32, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have no idea who this AndInFirstPlace person is. I've seen them comment on this article and I just happen to agree with them but otherwise I have no relation to them whatsoever. There are a lot of passionate political observers out there (just check out Reddit and Twitter) and Yang has a lot of people who genuinely believe he is a serious candidate and can win. After 2016 and the victory of AOC over Crowley, I could see it and think the distinction between major and other declared is probably specious. Thanks!SkullKnight1189284 (talk) 05:19, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn;t matter one white if there are "passionate people" who believe that Yang can win. The only thing that matters is whether a reliable source refers to Yang as a "major declared candidate". Do you have a citation from a reliable source that says that? Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:17, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Having an article declare you as a "major declared candidate"was never part of the criteria listed and discussed and debated by people. It was holding political office or having 5 major polls list you. We were debating the veracity of those criteria and also mentioning Yang had held political office. Someone or myself made the argument that his ambassadorship in the Obama administration should count. talk SkullKnight1189284 (talk) 08:29, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Then the entire thing needs to be scrapped, because we should never be the ones determining who is and who isn;t a "major candidate". There's no special dispensation for the requirement for verifiability by way of citations from reliable sources. Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:35, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanctions Notification - American Politics[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:37, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]