User talk:SlaveCrixus

Please read WP:CIVIL and do not leave any more irrelevant templates on people's user talk pages. Thanks. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 10:10, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"For some people, it may be crucial to receive an apology from those who have offended them. For this reason, a sincere apology is often the key to the resolution of a conflict: an apology is a symbol of forgiveness. An apology is very much recommended when one person's perceived incivility has offended another."

Ok, I apologize to Zeq for suggesting that he shouldn't disclose personal information about other editors (e.g. HOTR, Zero), or otherwise engage in harassment. I'm sorry Zeq. I apologize for suggesting that he should adhere to NPOV and check his contributions for spelling and grammatical errors. I'm sorry Zeq. I have to apologize here and not on his page though since SlimVirgin has protected it.[1] She also removed my comment to Zeq which read: "I am not User:HOTR[2], He's from Canada (or so I read in the article you started about his real-life identity) while I edit from either Stockholm or Amsterdam. The reason I used a sockpuppet was because of continuous harassment, including a few threatening emails. /SlaveCrixus 10:33, 7 July 2006 (UTC)"[3] Thank you and have a nice day. /SlaveCrixus 11:02, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative to checkuser[edit]

An alternative to check user is to send e-mails (not through wikipedia, but direct from your e-mail program) to a mutually trusted admin (or editor) who can do some verifications. This comes down to the same level of security as checkuser has (or even better). -- Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 13:59, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

please see further here: User_talk:JDoorjam#Alternative_to_checkuser-- Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 14:17, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SlaveCrixius, you have been accused of being my sockpuppet due to your nature of your edits. I would appreciate it if you could please email Kim above so that we can disprove that accusation - you can trust her not to reveal your identity. Homey 14:17, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fine[edit]

Kim,

Maybe you can unblock son of zion (another sock pupet) and have him mail you as well. Zeq 16:16, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need for unblocking before they can send me an e-mail, but that person can do that as well. -- Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 16:25, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]