User talk:Slazenger/Archives/2014/September
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Ulnar tunnel syndrome
Hello, thanks for alerting me of your changes. I just wanted to respond to your revert and maybe find a middle ground. I moved the page from "Guyon's canal syndrome" to "Ulnar Tunnel Syndrome" because it is preferred/non-eponymous terminology. In addition, I changed the section entitled "Pathology" because its contents was describing classification. Lastly, I altered the contents of the said section because the previous contents was totally un-cited. Thoughts? Dr G (talk) 05:34, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- I think that was a sensible thing to do. Make sure that other mentions of the syndrome are changed as well, such as Ulnar_nerve_entrapment#Guyon.27s_canal_syndrome, etc. Also, be sure to make it clear in the article that Ulnar Tunnel Syndrome is preferred (listed first), with 'also known as' for the Guyon's nomenclature, etc. Happy editing! --Slazenger (Contact Me) 06:01, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
we are an online store
why cant our website name can be published here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by VijayQusec (talk • contribs) 06:10, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- Your addition to the article was purely promotional in nature, directly linking to your site for advertising purposes. You addition goes against WP:EL (especially WP:ADV) as well as WP:NOTPROMOTION. Lastly, you clearly have a conflict of interest with the topic. Hope this helps. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 06:17, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi You are taking it too personal? why not this articles can be listed in online grocers, as we are an online grocery store? Please add it, Dont be so rude, — Preceding unsigned comment added by VijayQusec (talk • contribs) 07:59, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- It's not a case of being rude, it's a case of not allowing Wikipedia to serve as your personal advertisement for your business. If you would take the time to actually look into the resources I linked above, you would have a clear understanding of how your entries violated what is allowable on Wikipedia. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 15:20, 9 September 2014 (UTC)