User talk:Smelly Chimp

December 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ruby Day, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dismas|^(talk) 21:50, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Royal Bank of Scotland with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wikipelli ^Talk 21:56, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Royal Bank of Scotland with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipelli ^Talk 21:57, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Minorities in Turkey, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 21:57, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia for vandalism. Page blanking, addition of random text or spam, repeated tripping of the edit filter, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of our neutrality policy are considered vandalism. Malinaccier (talk) 22:34, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Smelly Chimp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not sure why I was blocked. I was warned yes. But suddenly I was blocked while looking at an article that I had no intent to edit, and had not edited. I feel the block is unnessecary because I did not break the warning that I would be blocked the next time. Please unblock me, I will be good. Smelly Chimp (talk) 22:53, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The unblock template is a tool to assist people who have been blocked by error, or whose blocks are related to solvable problems. You are a simple vandal, so obviously you will not be unblocked. When you registered for an account and began vandalizing, you made a choice to be blocked. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:01, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.