Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Utopes were:
Subject needs significant coverage from reliable sources that are secondary and independent of the subject, per Wikipedia's guidelines. External links shouldn't be anywhere in the body of the article. Currently 40% of references are from the subject's personal website, which is a no-go for establishing the subject's notability as a musician.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeffrey Eli Hass and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Snackwell122!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Utopes(talk / cont) 02:20, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeffrey Eli Hass and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CurryTime7-24 was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeffrey Hass and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
I would like to point out that this article concerns a very, very narrow field, perhaps of 60-70 notable practitioners with very little secondary material generated. Composers are usually evaluated based on their awards, performances, academic appointments and influence in the field, which apply to this figure. In this case, this figure directed a major computer music studio at one of the top three music schools (US News rating) for 40 years. His academic colleagues, and many others in the field of electronic music with similar or far lesser references have accepted Wikipedia pages (Frederick Fox, Claude Baker, Don Freund). Please examine these and let me know if you are willing to change your evaluation, or if you know, what the mechanism for appeal is. The page has been re-edited 3 times and I doubt any further edits would add to the decision-making process. Thank you for taking the time to review. It is appreciated. Snackwell122 (talk) 21:53, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
