User talk:Snort Barfly

Asperger syndrome[edit]

Now you wouldn't want a mother whose son has just been diagnosed with Asperger syndrome to come to Wikipedia to find out about it and see that, would you? I think that, while maybe amusing to some, your edit to Asperger syndrome unfortunately consistutes vandalism and so I have reverted it. Please try and be more constructive in the future. Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 21:12, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're pathetic. Snort Barfly (talk) 21:31, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Asperger syndrome, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Eubulides (talk) 21:43, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editing other users' pages[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Soap. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eubulides (talk) 21:48, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Micronation on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - Adolphus79 (talk) 21:48, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009[edit]

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Moriori. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. Your edits summaries are not funny. Snowman (talk) 08:56, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summaries like at Kea to call people child molesters for punctuation and footnotes is way over the top, so I have blocked you for a week. -- Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 09:32, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]