User talk:Snyjhon

Hi Everyone

well thank you so much for your warm greetings! As I am new on Wikipedia, but I am enjoying to improving information on it. --Snyjhon (talk) 18:18, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bonsai Artist & Environmentalist RJ Raawat.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Bonsai Artist & Environmentalist RJ Raawat.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://twitter.com/rjraawat/status/1124716439544295424. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 16:45, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

if it is not according to Wikipedia policy. please delete it. i have no objection. I will take care of this in future.

Thank you Snyjhon (talk) 17:22, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RJ Raawat moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, RJ Raawat, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 06:07, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Samajh NGO moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, The Samajh NGO, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 18:50, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Wikipedian According to Wikipedia's notability policy, we can create an article on any topic if there is a notable reference. Many notable references are included with this article, please see the article and references once again. According to the terms of wikipedia, no rule has been violated in this article. I humbly request you to remove this tag and make it live. Thank you with regards. Snyjhon (talk) 19:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The sources aren't independent or reliable and you need to read WP:COI and WP:PAID. CUPIDICAE💕 19:22, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae please check reference no. 2. Is it no independent or reliable? atleast read first please Snyjhon (talk) 19:28, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022[edit]

Hello Snyjhon. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Snyjhon. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Snyjhon|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. CUPIDICAE💕 19:29, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae in our district the samjh ngo is doing many charitable activities and I'm also one of the beneficiary of them. this the only reason I'm writing about this organisation. if i am writing many articles about the same organisation then it is not mean that i am promoting them with money. why are you not accepting notable news reference for this organisation? please put a admin help tag in this article so we can discuss it with admin. thanks Snyjhon (talk) 19:36, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I won't be moving it back to mainspace and I see no evidence it's notable. If it is moved back, I will AFD it. However, you need to recognize that doing good work does not mean a subject is notable. CUPIDICAE💕 19:44, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae I understand. if possible for you, please help me to make it better. after all i already do my best to creat it. otherwise you can put a delete tag in this article. thank you ☺️ Snyjhon (talk) 19:53, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Samajh NGO (May 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Samajh NGO and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Samajh NGO, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PRAXIDICAE💕 19:59, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Snyjhon! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! PRAXIDICAE💕 19:59, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]