User talk:Sokolo11

Sokolo11, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Sokolo11! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:17, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Frame of a vector space[edit]

Hello.

One initial reaction I have to Frame (signal processing) is to wonder whether it should be a seperate article from Frame of a vector space, which has been there for a while.

Notice I changed "Frames" in the title to "Frame", since under WP:MOS, article titles should be singular except when there is a special reason to use the plural. Also, you had too many capital letters for WP:MOS.

Another issue is: Which other articles should link to this article. So far, no others link to it. Michael Hardy (talk) 20:56, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

At Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mathematics#Frame_.28signal_processing.29 I've raised the question of whether this article should be merged with Frame of a vector space. Michael Hardy (talk) 21:22, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Don't know how exactly I'm suppose to respond to your comment (this is my first Wikipedia page) so I'm wondering if my response here will allow you to see it. Thank you for the information about headings. You mentioned I had too many capital letters for WP:MOS -- so I was wondering what specific thing within my article you are referring to or if you are referring to the same heading/title that you mentioned in the previous sentence.

It is quite possible that this could be merged with frames of a vector space - as the content and material may be somewhat similar, but I include more information from a signal processing point of view. Thanks for the insight.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by APerson was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Basis function instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sokolo11/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

APerson (talk!) 01:02, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Sokolo11/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Sokolo11. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Sokolo11/sandbox}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 11:28, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]