User talk:Solid Reign

Welcome!

Hello, Solid Reign, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Karma fist 19:31, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Polo Polo[edit]

Hi! Simply saying "Polo Polo is a Mexican comedian" is not sufficient information. It's up to you to expand this. For instance, where was he born? What work of his is famous? Has he done movies? Television? Does he still perform concerts? Anyone researching the subject knows that he/she is a comedian. Think of the end user. That end user needs as much information as they can get. Anyway, give it another try. If the article has been deleted (and it's likely that it has been), rewrite it with much more info. Here's the standard welcome greeting which has links to lots of help pages. Have fun. - Lucky 6.9 03:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Solid Reign, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Exactly. In order to be included, it has to have a lot more information. The article title hasn't been blocked. It's just that it has to be more than a placeholder for an introductory sentence. Let's try anew. I'll see what I can find on the guy and do a stub article to show you what I mean. - Lucky 6.9 03:40, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The new Polo Polo :)[edit]

I do believe that you and I have made a neat new article. I'll return later to add external links and a couple of album covers. See what fun this is? Signing off for now. Later! - Lucky 6.9 04:02, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help. Apparently, this is one big dude in Mexican entertainment who's way overdue for an article. Online info is a bit sketchy but we now have something to work with. Take care and thanks for your contributions. I restored the deletions in order that you'd receive credit instead of me for starting the article. - Lucky 6.9 04:06, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Danza de los Viejitos[edit]

Thank you for starting the article. It has been on my list for far too long. Happy wiki-ing, --Rockero 04:22, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

“vandalism”[edit]

When your edit summary merely reads “vandalism”, the first-pass reading is that your edit is vandalism. ;-) (Mind you that we should be so lucky as to have the vandals label their edits thus.) —12.72.69.62 15:40, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signing your comments[edit]

Could you please sign your comments with ~~~~, so people would know who you are and when the comment was posted? This was also given to you in your welcome messege, see above. Thanks. Michaelas10 15:20, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ITESM Citation[edit]

I don't seem to find it either... Apparently they removed it from their site, as it has changed since the last time I checked it about a year ago.

My apologies, it was my mistake. However, if there is no source, then the correct course of action would be to eliminate the statement.

Hari Seldon 05:09, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the reason it was removed from the ITESM website is that, while the claim may be true for the major campus (Monterrey, Mexico City, etc...), it may not be true for newer or smaller campus. I think it would be best if it was removed and/or replaced with that part of the mission statement. Hari Seldon 16:39, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Inocente Palomita[edit]

Fue divertido, a poco no? Hari Seldon 17:15, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:In the pit.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:In the pit.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:40, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Xayacamach of Tizatlan[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Xayacamach of Tizatlan) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. ^SyBer_WoLff 01:52, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- I will take the deletion off of this page as you intend to work on it but please make sure that when you're about to submit a completely new article you spell check it, grammar check it, and have some good content that will make it useful right off the bat or else it will suffer the same fate. ^SyBer_WoLff 02:01, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- - "which is were we get his poems from" makes absolutely no grammatical sense. I don't know what you're native language is or how old you are so I can't judge anything but that is not by any means proper English. ^SyBer_WoLff 02:22, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - And learn how to use the Preview button before you go editing a persons talk page 4 or 5 times please. ^SyBer_WoLff 02:23, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Dolores Hidalgo; Viva Villa!; Luis Carlos Ugalde; Esteban Moctezuma; Hollywood Palladium; Amos Kendall; Javier Alatorre; Temporada de patos; Papantla; Alejandro González Iñárritu; Digna... hasta el último aliento; Zócalo; Telecosmo; Azcapotzalco; Pierre Fresnay; El Norte (newspaper); List of television stations in Mexico by call sign; Lacandon; List of Mexican magazines

Cleanup: Luis Echeverría; Aztec calendar; Carlos Salinas de Gortari
Merge: Secretary of Finance (Mexico); Cajeta; United States–Mexico barrier
Add Sources: Blood Feast; Miguel de la Madrid; Jorge Lankenau
Wikify: René Strickler; Yadhira Carrillo; Theological fatalism
Expand: XERV-TV; Julieta Venegas; Torreón

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of massacres[edit]

Hi. I noticed your edit here. It would be appreciated if you could contribute to the discussion at Talk:List of massacres rather than making any other changes to the article, for the time being. This will be in the long term, more likely to improve the article. Thanks for your understanding. --John (talk) 17:24, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your rollback request[edit]

Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for rollback/Denied/February 2008#Solid Reign. RFRBot (talk) 17:00, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Or not, read Wikipedia:Rollback feature and only use it for vandalism. John Reaves 15:30, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re:Mexico State[edit]

Hi, I just saw your message, about a year ago, the name of the article was "México (state)" and then I noticed that that led people to refer to the state simply as "México" so I proposed to change the name of the article to "State of Mexico" directly from the Spanish "Estado de México", but then I realized that it would make more sense to name it "Mexico State" because that way people wouldn’t name it simply Mexico and also because it followed the same logic as "Mexico City" (Ciudad de México), so now every time I see in some article the old name I just correct it, regards. Supaman89 (talk) 23:01, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had written such a big message and right when I was going to send it, I clicked in the wrong place and I lost it, grr (X.X). Sry I just had to say it, anyways I won't write that much this time ^^!, if you look at the other state-articles for Mexico they all say "State of.." in the infobox (ex. State of Veracruz, State of Quintana Roo, etc.) so I think that if we put State of Mexico for that article that would lead people to call it simply México, and that's when we have a problem cuz that overlaps with the name of the country, in Spanish everyone calls it Estado de México so it won't be confused with the whole country, but unfortunately in English people don't like big names, and they will simply say México (like they do it right now), but if it says Mexico State it kinda forces them to say it completly, just like in Mexico City (Ciudad de México), regards. Supaman89 (talk) 20:48, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm sorry I don't mean to disagree with you but the official name is Estado de Mexico not just Mexico (believe I'm from Mexico, I know) in Spanish we don't have a problem because we do say it completely all the time, but in English people don't care whether is overlaps with the name of the country or not, they will just call it México, and there we have a problem, so why would anyone want to overlap it when you can fix it by simply translating Estado de Mexico into Mexico State just like in Mexico City, please think about it. Supaman89 (talk) 18:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Que bien, entonces tambien eres de México, mira entonces no entiendo el problema, mira por ejemplo en el articulo de Nuevo León en la infobox dice "State of Nuevo León" asi que si pones "Monterrey, Nuevo León" no hay ningun problema, pero si en el articulo del Estado de México pones "State of Mexico" la gente no va a poner "Toluca, State of Mexico" si no que van a poner "Toluca, Mexico" y ahi se encima con el nombre del pais, obviamente a ellos no les importa por que no es su pais, pero a nosotros si, por eso es que "Toluca, Mexico State" es mucho mas propio y evita confuciones, asi como en español siempre decimos "Toluca, Estado de México" jamas decimos "Toluca, México" precisamente para no mezclarlo con todo el pais. Supaman89 (talk) 23:27, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mira, no es de que estemos escogiendo el nombre, de hecho Mexico State tambien es una traduccion correcta de Estado de Mexico, y como dije antes sabemos cuales serian los efectos de nombrarlo State of Mexico (recuerda que yo fue el que lo propuse y se lo que paso), y luego yo tendria que estar constantemente corrigiendo varios articulos (como lo hago ahora) por que la gente pondria Toluca, Mexico en vez de Toluca, Mexico State, es como ver lo evidente y no hacer nada aunque este mal, como mencione anteriormente tampoco es como si estuvieramos creando un nombre, si no que Mexico State tambien es una traduccion correcta del nombre original, y si la gente lo conoce como State of Mexico (de por si ni siquiera creo que lo conoscan) bueno pues no pasa nada por que los redirigiria a la pagina original de todos modos, espero tu respuesta. Supaman89 (talk) 16:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Detail:

the name of the entire federation is not "Mexico", it is "United Mexican States", and the mexican constitution says it, and it also says in its 43° article, that officialy, the name of the state is "Mexico". Remembering a little, first, the Aztecs found Tenochtitlan, then they created a city-state, next an empire (Mexica) that was conformed by the actual states of Oaxaca, Michoacan, Hidalgo, Morelos, Puebla, Guerrero, Veracruz, Mexico, Federal District and parts of Queretaro, Guanajuato, Chiapas, and the region of Soconusco; they were conquered and reorganized as the Kigdom of Mexico, with the Borbonic Reforms it turned into the General Intendence of Arms and Provinces of Mexico, federalism came and it turned an state (without the territories of the actual states of Oaxaca, Michoacan, Queretaro, Guanajuato, Puebla, Tlaxcala, Chiapas, Veracruz and the Federal District), finally, it was divided into Morelos, Hidalgo and Guerrero. Actually, all the other states have never been "Mexico", they had other names and identities, like: New Galicia, New Santander, New Leon, New Vizcaya, Mayans, Olmecs, etc.,etc. --Ivylooy8540 (talk) 06:54, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb as reliable source[edit]

Hi, I reverted the DOB ref on Richard Simmons as IMBd is not reliable enough for such information. That cite is useful for confirming an actor has been in at least ten movies, for instance, but the standards for fact checking seems limited and as the site suggests relies heavily on user submissions and corrections. Benji boi 02:14, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi![edit]

Hi... thanks for responding to my query about who is active. I see reading your page here that you are from Mexico... ¡que bien! My goals have been to integrate writing for Wikipedia in as many of my advanced English classes here as possible and get Wikiproject Mexico functioning better. Id like your 2 cents on a discussion happening at WikiProject_Mexico/Terminology about naming municipio versus cabecera pages. Despite my 4 years or so here in Toluca, I was not really aware of the mess I would create when I asked students to write pages about towns. Interestingly enough, the lists of municipalities (e.g. Municipalities of Oaxaca) show separate links for the cabecera and municipio but 90% of the time link to the same page (be it written or not), except in cases where the municipio name and cabecera names are different (like for the municipality of San Miguel Soyaltepec in Oaxaca, with the seat name of Temascal (town).

Anyway, if you would like to check out my userpage, there is a navigation bar with links to pages related to the work my students do, including a mentor's page. My course for teachers here heavily works with Wikipedia so feel free to contact them if you like.Thelmadatter (talk) 14:14, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Municipalities vs Seats[edit]

Hello! I an in a course with Thelmadatter. I read you are an active user of the Wikiproject Mexico. Could you give us your opinion about a discussion we are having at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Mexico/Strategy

Your comments will be much appreciated. --Judith Soto | Talk 16:53, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:En el hoyo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:En el hoyo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 12:04, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Lomas de Chapultepec.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Lomas de Chapultepec.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:00, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Solid Reign! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 938 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Eclypso - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 16:43, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Errr-magazine 6.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Errr-magazine 6.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:20, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Mindelight.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Mindelight.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:21, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In Andrés Manuel López Obrador, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page El Universal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:52, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Solid Reign. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Danza de los Viejitos[edit]

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Danza de los Viejitos to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. <RetroCraft314 talk/> 01:14, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Solid Reign. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Discussion re grave insults by user Gandharraj[edit]

@Solid Reign: I have launched a complaint against user Gandharraj after the repeated grave insults ("racist" "sexist", etc) launched at the other editors on the Hanna Jaff talk page Administrators's Noticeboard discussion. I would appreciate if you could have a look, so that we can proceed with the editing at hand in peace. A.Val.sol (talk) 21:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ricardo Asch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexican. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reichman University[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reichman University, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:14, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Errr-Magazine[edit]

The article Errr-Magazine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent coverage; fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jalen Folf (talk) 02:10, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Errr-Magazine for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Errr-Magazine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Errr-Magazine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jalen Folf (talk) 17:40, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Errr-magazine 6.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Errr-magazine 6.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrés Bustamante for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrés Bustamante is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrés Bustamante until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 13:16, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marcelo Ebrard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MORENA.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]